Paper · 1976 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Response of Grapes to Water-Deficit Stress in Particular Stages of Development

W. J. Hardie; J. A. Considine

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
218
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Severe water stress was induced in container-grown grapevines during five stages of fruit growth. Stress at each stage reduced fresh fruit yield. During the first three weeks after flowering, losses were greatest and were primarily attributable to reduced fruit set. Thereafter loss was associated with reduced berry size and, following stress after véraison, the failure of fruit to mature. Fruit which failed to mature also had a lower skin pigment content, whether assessed on a per-berry or per-unit-surfacearea basis. All fruit from stressed vines was late to mature, though the delay was greatest for fruit stressed during the lag phase.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe water stress at each of five fruit-growth stages reduced fresh fruit yield in grapevines.

Taxon
Grapest0
Organ / stage
fruit growthe0
Treatment
Severe water stresse0
Outcome
fresh fruit yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Severe water stress was induced in container-grown grapevines during five stages of fruit growth. Stress at each stage reduced fresh fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress in the first three weeks after flowering caused the greatest yield losses, mainly through reduced fruit set.

Taxon
Grapest0
Organ / stage
first three weeks after floweringe0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“During the first three weeks after flowering, losses were greatest and were primarily attributable to reduced fruit set.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–266 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later water-stress-related yield loss was associated with reduced berry size.

Taxon
Grapest0
Organ / stage
berrye0
Outcome
berry sizee0
Direction
reducede0

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Thereafter loss was associated with reduced berry size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–321 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress after véraison was associated with failure of fruit to mature.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
stress after véraisone0
Outcome
failure of fruit to maturee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“following stress after véraison, the failure of fruit to mature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–390 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit that failed to mature had lower skin pigment content on both per-berry and per-unit-surfacearea bases.

Taxon
Grapest0
Organ / stage
Fruit which failed to maturee0
Outcome
skin pigment contente0
Direction
lowere0

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit which failed to mature also had a lower skin pigment content, whether assessed on a per-berry or per-unit-surfacearea basis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from all water-stressed vines matured late.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
stressed vinese0
Outcome
late to maturee0
Direction
latee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“All fruit from stressed vines was late to mature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maturation delay was greatest when fruit was stressed during the lag phase.

Taxon
Grapest0
Organ / stage
lag phasee0
Treatment
stressed during the lag phasee0
Outcome
delaye0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“the delay was greatest for fruit stressed during the lag phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–642 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · VitisResults differ

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.