Paper · 2014 · Guangdong nongye kexue

Effect of water deficit on growth characteristics and quality of delayed cultivation grape during different stages

Kong Wei-pin

8
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

To study the effect of regulated deficit irrigation on growth characteristics and quality of the grape under delayed cultivation during different growth stages,using five treatments including:mild water deficit at,germination stage(RDI-Ⅰ),vining stage(RDI-Ⅱ),blossom period(RDI-Ⅲ),fruit enlargement(RDI-IV)and ripening stage(RDI-Ⅴ) and control group with sufficient water supply were set.The results showed that,water deficit had significant effecs on the growth characteristics and quality of the grape during different stages compared with control.Although during the germination and vining stage,mild water deficit had no significant effect on the normal growth of grape plants and photosynthesis.However,under moderate water deficit during germination stage,the yield of delayed cultivation grapes increased 2.87% than CK.Further,during ripening period,grape quality improved considerably under moderate water stress,and it markedly enhanced the grape sugar content(22.29% more than CK),while reduced the total soluble solid contents and titratable acidity(reduced by 7.08% and 3.41% respectively than CK),maintained higher content of anthocyanin glycosides and the overall optimal grape quality.The resn'ts indicate that different water deficit conditions during different growth stages enhanced the grape quality,coloring maturity and growth,and it could be the best way to improve grape quality under mild water deficit during fruit ripening stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mild deficit during germination and vining did not significantly affect growth or photosynthesis.

Taxon
grapee0
Organ / stage
germination and vining stagee0
Treatment
mild water deficite0
Outcome
normal growth of grape plants and photosynthesise0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“during the germination and vining stage,mild water deficit had no significant effect on the normal growth of grape plants and photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate deficit at germination increased yield by 2.87% versus CK.

Taxon
grapese0
Organ / stage
germination stagee0
Treatment
moderate water deficite0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.87%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“under moderate water deficit during germination stage,the yield of delayed cultivation grapes increased 2.87% than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress at ripening increased grape sugar content by 22.29% versus CK.

Taxon
grapee0
Organ / stage
ripening periode0
Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
grape sugar contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
22.29%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“during ripening period,grape quality improved considerably under moderate water stress,and it markedly enhanced the grape sugar content(22.29% more than CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate deficit at ripening reduced total soluble solids by 7.08% versus CK.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
total soluble solid contentse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.08%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“under moderate water stress,and it markedly enhanced the grape sugar content(22.29% more than CK),while reduced the total soluble solid contents and titratable acidity(reduced by 7.08% and 3.41% respectively than CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate deficit at ripening reduced titratable acidity by 3.41% versus CK.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3.41%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“under moderate water stress,and it markedly enhanced the grape sugar content(22.29% more than CK),while reduced the total soluble solid contents and titratable acidity(reduced by 7.08% and 3.41% respectively than CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate deficit at ripening maintained higher anthocyanin glycoside content.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
content of anthocyanin glycosidese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“under moderate water stress,and it markedly enhanced the grape sugar content(22.29% more than CK),while reduced the total soluble solid contents and titratable acidity(reduced by 7.08% and 3.41% respectively than CK),maintained higher content of anthocyanin glycosides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1161 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape quality improved considerably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress at ripening improved overall grape quality.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
grape qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“during ripening period,grape quality improved considerably under moderate water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–920 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend mild water deficit during fruit ripening to improve grape quality.

Taxon
grapee0
Organ / stage
fruit ripening stagee0
Treatment
mild water deficite0
Outcome
improve grape qualitye0

Verbatim

e0

“it could be the best way to improve grape quality under mild water deficit during fruit ripening stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1454 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: phytochemicals · VitisResults differ

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

drought · yield · VitisResults differ

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

21 papers: 10 positive, 11 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisResults differ

36 papers: 7 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

drought · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.