Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The mineral soil, mycorrhizae and 80% terra preta treatment ranked best for root and canopy wet and dry weight.

A claim from The effect of Terra preta media using pirolysis system on growth and production of corn (Zea mays L) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mineral soil, mycorrhizae and 80% terra preta treatment ranked best for root and canopy wet and dry weight.

Treatment
T5 treatment: mineral soil + 15gr mycorrhizae + 80% terra pretae0
Interactor
mycorrhizaee0symbiont
Outcome
wet weight and dry weight of root, canopye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On observation of the number of leaves, of wet weight and dry weight of root, canopy, corn seed, corn cob and corn husk of T5 treatment: mineral soil + 15gr mycorrhizae + 80% terra preta showed the best treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1522

Title

The effect of Terra preta media using pirolysis system on growth and production of corn (Zea mays L)

A. Sutopo; Yuliyanto Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2020. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4242769

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e4bdfe61357eb8a26d0b90a727126acf362e137413e3cb5073d02559e16ccd84 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

188 papers: 169 positive, 19 negative or no effect

168 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Plants grown at high P with mycorrhizae accumulated only 88% of the biomass of plants grown without mycorrhizae, indicating that mycorrhizae can reduce growth when not contributing to the symbiosis.

    Variation among Maize Inbred Lines and Detection of Quantitative Trait Loci for Growth at Low Phosphorus and Responsiveness to Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi · 2000 · compared with in the absence of mycorrhizae

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Reid Yellow Dent, an unimproved corn cultivar, showed no growth response to mycorrhizal colonization in the greenhouse.

    Mycorrhizal Dependency and Nutrient Uptake by Improved and Unimproved Corn and Soybean Cultivars · 1994

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Plant dry mass of maize was not affected by the mycorrhizal fungus.

    Transfer of symbiotically fixed nitrogen from berseem (Trifolium alexandrinumL.) to maize via vesicular—arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae · 1992

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    VAM depressed root to total dry weight ratio in PX610.

    Effect of vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizas on two varieties of maize and one of sweetcorn · 1978

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Mycorrhizas reduced maize growth.

    Intra- and inter-specific density affects plant growth responses to arbuscular mycorrhizas · 2008

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Bacterial inoculation did not increase nitrogen content in maize biomass.

    Effect of diazotrophic bacteria isolated from a mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on colonization of maize roots by Glomus fistulosum · 1998

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Disrupting mycorrhizal phosphate uptake strongly diminished growth performance.

    Neighboring plants divergently modulate effects of loss-of-function in maize mycorrhizal phosphate uptake on host physiology and root fungal microbiota · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    The combination of coffee husk compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi did not significantly affect plant height, number of leaves and length of cob of sweet corn.

    Efektivitas aplikasi kompos kulit kopi dan Fungi mikoriza arbuskular terhadap produktivitas jagung manis · 2019

    Opposite direction

179 papers more in this group

See all 188 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.