Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Crimson Sweet grafted on bitter apple had 11.7% higher fruit dry matter than Crimson Sweet grafted on Shintosa.

A claim from Evaluation of bitter apple (Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad) as potential rootstock for watermelon · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crimson Sweet grafted on bitter apple had 11.7% higher fruit dry matter than Crimson Sweet grafted on Shintosa.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
Crimson Sweete1
Treatment
Crimson Sweet grafted on bitter applee4
Outcome
fruit DMe4
Direction
highere4
Value
11.7%e4
Comparator
those grafted on Shintosae4

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluate bitter apple as potential rootstock for watermelon (cv. Crimson Sweet)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–540
e4

“The fruit DM and TSS contents recorded for Crimson Sweet grafted on bitter apple were significantly higher than those grafted on Shintosa by 11.7% and 8.4%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1625

Title

Evaluation of bitter apple (Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad) as potential rootstock for watermelon

Mahdi Bigdelo; Mohammad Reza Hassandokht; Youssef Rouphael; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2017. doi:10.21475/ajcs.17.11.06.p492

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e4a33aee74afa48d7587c90bb2f13e0443616cd35a9ba5d13508bbd692d92a08 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Citrullus colocynthis · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

grafting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.