Intervention effectmodel-written summary

RDI supplying 50% ETc during phase II gave greater mango root length density.

A claim from Fruit yield and root system distribution of 'Tommy Atkins' mango under different irrigation regimes · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI supplying 50% ETc during phase II gave greater mango root length density.

Material
'Tommy Atkins'e0
Treatment
regulated deficit irrigation supplying 50% of the ETc during phase I and IIe0
Outcome
root length densitye0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The regulated deficit irrigation supplying 50% of the ETc during phase I and II provided larger root length density of 'Tommy Atkins' mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–802

Title

Fruit yield and root system distribution of 'Tommy Atkins' mango under different irrigation regimes

Marcelo R. dos Santos; Mauro A. Martinez; Sérgio L. R. Donato; et al. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 2014. doi:10.1590/s1415-43662014000400002

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-ba68239c19ea2f1dd0ee28eeeb2bb20d3d56127d5f26ddbf77fca9221a3b94bc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.