Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: sugarbeet ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizing for maximum root yield cut early September return by $3l/acre.

Treatment
maximum root yielde3
Outcome
decreasee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
$3l/acree0
Qualifier
10–16 Septembere0
Comparator
maximum net returne3

Verbatim

e0

“a $3l/acre decrease ($576 vs. $545) in the earliest (10–16 September) period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4755–4831
t0

“sugarbeet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 59–68
e3

“fertilizing for maximum root yield (vs. maximum net return) required 78 to 88 lb/acre of additional N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4476–4577

Title

An Economic Analysis of Reducing Nitrogen on Early Harvest Sugarbeets

Larry J. Held; Paul A. Burgener; Joseph G. Lauer; et al. jpa 1994. doi:10.2134/jpa1994.0422

Other claims from this paper (16)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn concentration in tops associated with a 20% yield decrease was 740 ppm for sugarbeet.

Outcome
Zinc concentrations in tops associated with a 20% YDe0
Value
740 ppme0

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc concentrations in tops associated with a 20% YD ranged from 240 ppm for field bean to 740 ppm for sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1037

Title

Crop Response to Excessive Zinc Fertilization of Alkaline Soil1

Louis C. Boawn; P. E. Rasmussen Agronomy Journal 1971. doi:10.2134/agronj1971.00021962006300060015x

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ww reduced root yield by 21 percent.

Treatment
Ww indexe2
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
decreasee1
Value
21 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–16
e0

“21 percent of root yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1031
e1

“caused to decrease 43 percent consumed water and 21 percent of root yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1031
e2

“Ww index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–899

Title

Autumn Sugarbeet Irrigation Water Optimization Basis of Yield and Cost Functions in North of the Khuzestan

Mohammad Khoramian; Mostafa Hossien pour DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016. doi:10.22055/jise.2016.12346

Other claims from this paper (8)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater infection severity decreased gross sucrose yield, yield components and purity.

Treatment
increasing severity of C. beticola infectione0
Interactor
C. beticolaCercospora beticolae0pathogen
Outcome
gross sucrose yield, yield components, and puritye0
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing severity of C. beticola infection there was a general increase in nonsucrose chemical components, and decrease in gross sucrose yield, yield components, and purity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1046
e1

“sugarbeet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–66

Title

Differential Response of Sugarbeet Cultivars to Cercospora Leaf Spot Disease1

G. A. Smith; S. S. Martin Crop Science 1978. doi:10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183x001800010011x

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ww decreased irrigation costs.

Treatment
Ww indexe0
Outcome
irrigation costse1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–16
e0

“Ww index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–899
e1

“decrease irrigation costs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1099

Title

Autumn Sugarbeet Irrigation Water Optimization Basis of Yield and Cost Functions in North of the Khuzestan

Mohammad Khoramian; Mostafa Hossien pour DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016. doi:10.22055/jise.2016.12346

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting leaf groups tended to decrease photosynthesis ratio, water usage efficiency and respiration ratio in sugarbeet.

Treatment
leaf groups were cut upe4
Outcome
photosynthesis ratio, water usage efficiency and respiration ratioe4
Direction
tend to decreasee4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“By the method of cutting different leaf group from sugarbeet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67
e4

“after leaf groups were cut up, the photosynthesis ratio, water usage efficiency and respiration ratio tend to decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1002

Title

Effect of Difference Resource Leaf to Yield and Qualityin Sugarbeet Groundcovered with Plastic Film

Wei Changzhou Xibei nongye xuebao 1999

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early 2,4-D application tended to lower root yield.

Organ / stage
early growth stagese0
Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
tended toe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When applied at early growth stages 2,4-D tended to decrease root yield but decreased purity and extractable sucrose content by as much as 54% when applied at later growth stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–392
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9

Title

Sugarbeet (Beta vulgarisL.) Response to Simulated Herbicide Spray Drift

Galen L. Schroeder; Darrell F. Cole; Alan G. Dexter Weed Science 1983. doi:10.1017/s004317450007082x

Other claims from this paper (12)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each susceptibility increment was associated with 2.9 Mg/ha lower root yield during severe disease.

Interactor
CercosporaCercosporae0pathogen
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
2.9 Mg/hae0
Qualifier
severe epiphytotic (1991)e0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78
e0

“A 2.9 Mg/ha decrease in root yield associated with each increment increase in susceptibility confirmed that under a severe epiphytotic (1991) Cercospora resistance provided substantial protection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–568

Title

Association between resistance to Cercospora and yield in commercial sugarbeet hybrids

G. A. Smith; L. G. Campbell Plant Breeding 1996. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1996.tb00866.x

Other claims from this paper (3)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarbeet root yield was negatively related to sugarbeet fly infestation; more larvae were associated with lower root yield.

Interactor
Pegomia hyo-scyami Curtise0pest
Outcome
roots yielde1
Direction
decreasee1

Verbatim

e0

“the relationship between the yield of sugarbeet and the infestation of sugarbeet fly, Pegomia hyo-scyami Curtis (Pegomyia mixta Vill.) was negative”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–490
e1

“an increase in larvae numbers caused a decrease in roots yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–574

Title

Population Fluctuation and Determination of The Economic Injury Level and The Economic Threshold for The Sugarbeet Fly, Pegomia hyo-scyami Curtis, in Nobaria Region, El-Behaira Governorate, Egypt.

ossman zaghloul; magdy abdelzaher; hassan mesbah; et al. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches/Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches 2015. doi:10.21608/jalexu.2015.161606

Other claims from this paper (5)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In late July to early September, N addition and N uptake caused the greatest decrease in sucrose accumulation and production at harvest.

Treatment
addition of N and N uptake by the plante3
Outcome
sucrose accumulation and production at harveste3
Direction
greatest decreasee3
Qualifier
during this periode3

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarbeet ( Beta vulgaris L.) root quality has been steadily decreasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80
e3

“during this period, addition of N and N uptake by the plant caused the greatest decrease in sucrose accumulation and production at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1378

Title

Effect of Time and Amount of Nitrogen Uptake on Sugarbeet Growth and Yield1

J. N. Carter; D. J. Traveller Agronomy Journal 1981. doi:10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300040023x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.