View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: cucumber ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
But excessive fertilization also could cause the decrease of cucumber yield and quality.
excessive fertilization e0 cucumber yield and quality e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “But excessive fertilization also could cause the decrease of cucumber yield and quality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–776 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect under the same levels of nitrogen and potassium,increasing the ratio of organic fertilizer was helpful to the increase of cucumber yield and quality. Intervention effect The commercial quality and flavor of cucumber were improved with the increase of fertilizer Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect At the same time,the nitrate content in cucumber also increased rapidly. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing cucumber density did not decrease weekly yield per area or total yield .
reducing plant density e0 weekly yield per unit area and total yield e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “reducing plant density did not significantly affect the photosynthesis of leaves and did not decrease weekly yield per unit area and total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–845 t0 “Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–76 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The screenhouse climate corresponded to a 50% decrease in cucumber fruit yield during spring/summer.
crop fruit yield e0 spring/summer period e0 Verbatim
e0 “These differences resulted in a 50% decrease in crop fruit yield during the spring/summer period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1356 t0 “Cucumber Fruit Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–49 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield rose as irrigation declined.
decrease of irrigation e0 Verbatim
e0 “Cucumber yield did not decrease but increased with the decrease of irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–396 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Upon gravitropic stimulation the yield threshold of the lower half of the cucumber stem did not decrease .
yield threshold of the lower half of the stem e6 did not decrease e6 upon gravitropic stimulation e6 Verbatim
t0 “Gravitropism of cucumber hypocotyls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 e6 “From pressure-block experiments, it appeared that upon gravitropic stimulation (1) the yield threshold of the lower half of the stem did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1123 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The model accurately predicted reduced cucumber fruit yield under shading.
shading treatments e0 cucumber fruit yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The model also accurately predicted the decrease in cucumber fruit yield under low-sunlight conditions (shading treatments) and the increase in yield due to supplemental lighting. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1428 Other claims from this paper (3) Association author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
PRD yield reductions were smaller than irrigation-water reductions, an advantage for water saving.
PRD treatments e0 decrease in yield e0 rate of decrease in irrigation water e0 Verbatim
e0 “the fact that the decrease in yield remains smaller than the rate of decrease in irrigation water can be seen as an advantage of PRD treatments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2072–2216 t0 “Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–98 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease d as irrigation water constraint increased.
irrigation water constraint e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “As irrigation water constraint increases, the yield has been found to decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1803 t0 “Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–98 Other claims from this paper (6) Association author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed phenology may decrease marketable cucumber yield by about 22%.
fruit setting e0 marketable yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “The delay, in relation to the dates in cluster 2 (high yield ), of the sowing date by 6 days, emergence by 16 days, flowering and fruit setting by 18 days, the beginning of harvesting by 19 days, and the end of harvesting by 22 days may contribute to a decrease in cucumber yield s even by about 27% and 22%, respectively for the total yield and the marketable yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1409 t0 “field cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–147 Other claims from this paper (8) Association author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed phenology may decrease total cucumber yield by about 27%.
flowering and fruit setting e0 Verbatim
e0 “The delay, in relation to the dates in cluster 2 (high yield ), of the sowing date by 6 days, emergence by 16 days, flowering and fruit setting by 18 days, the beginning of harvesting by 19 days, and the end of harvesting by 22 days may contribute to a decrease in cucumber yield s even by about 27% and 22%, respectively for the total yield and the marketable yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1409 t0 “field cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–147 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Cucumis sativuse0