Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 and Treatment 1 had similar digestibility for most of 1980–81.

Taxon: ryegrass/clover pasturee1
Treatment: Treatment 3e0
Outcome: digestibilitye0
Direction: similare0
Qualifier: 1980–81 growth periode0
Comparator: Treatment 1e2

Verbatim

e0
“The production of vegetative leaves in Treatment 3 resulted in a similar digestibility between Treatments 1 and 3 over most of the 1980–81 growth period.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1478

e1
“The growth of ryegrass/clover pasture”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–46

e2
“Compared with Treatment 1, Treatment 2 did not show a significant decrease in DM production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–703

Title

Factors influencing the yield and feeding value of pasture grown for conservation

J. A. Browse; R. M. Haslemore; R. Thaine New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 1984. doi:10.1080/03015521.1984.10427782

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Dry matter yield increased during growth within treatments.
Association Digestibility declined as dry matter yield increased.
Association Crude protein content declined as dry matter yield increased.
Intervention effect Treatment 2 did not significantly lower DM production relative to Treatment 1.
Intervention effect Treatment 2 produced more stem material than Treatment 1.
Intervention effect Treatment 2 digestibility was 3–12 percentage units lower than Treatment 1.
Intervention effect Treatment 2 reduced digestible dry matter yield by 15–40% relative to Treatment 1 at equal digestibility.
Observation At 70% digestibility, Treatment 2 yielded 4.8 t DM/ha per year.
Observation At 70% digestibility, Treatment 1 yielded 6.3 t DM/ha per year.
Intervention effect Treatment 3 produced a more vegetative sward than Treatments 1 and 2.
Intervention effect Treatment 3 lowered DM production relative to Treatments 1 and 2.
Intervention effect Treatment 3 lowered DDM production relative to Treatments 1 and 2.
Observation Late flowering Cynosurus in Treatment 3 increased early stem material in 1981–82.
Observation Digestibility was reduced in the 1981–82 Treatment 3 sward.
Observation After about 40 days, floral development completion in Treatment 3 prevented further digestibility decline.
Recommendation Early closing and cutting are recommended for high-quality conserved crops.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin B12 had no influence on red clover shoot N content

Taxon: red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Treatment: vitamin B12e1
Outcome: shoot N contente6
Direction: no influencee6
Comparator: 0e7

Verbatim

e0
“the flowering and yield parameters of red clover (Trifolium pretense L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–110

e1
“vitamin B12 markedly led to (A) a decrease in the flowering time by 5 days (100.2 to 95.9 days)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–615

e6
“a rise in the N content of the roots (107.8 to 173.3 mg plant−1), while having no influence on shoot N content”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1079

e7
“Two levels of vitamin B12 (0, 20 mg pot−1)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–409

Title

Phenology, Nitrogen Status, and Yield of Red Clover (Trifolium pretense L.) Affected by Application of Vitamin B12, Humic Acid, and Enriched Biochar

Dorna Saadat; Arthur Siller; Masoud Hashemi Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13122885

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Vitamin B12 decreased red clover flowering time by 5 days (100.2 to 95.9 days)
Intervention effect Co-application of vitamin B12 and humic acid further reduced flowering time to 84.5 days
Intervention effect Vitamin B12 increased the total number of red clover stems from 73.0 to 78.6 per plant
Intervention effect Vitamin B12 boosted red clover root dry weight by 60% (3.8 to 6.4 g)
Intervention effect Vitamin B12 had no significant influence on red clover shoot dry weight
Intervention effect Vitamin B12 decreased leaf trichome density of red clover by 30% (49.0 to 35.0 plant−1)
Intervention effect Vitamin B12 raised N content of red clover roots (107.8 to 173.3 mg plant−1)
Intervention effect Enriched biochar had minimal influence on red clover phenology and productivity
Recommendation Manure, naturally rich in vitamin B12 and humic acid, is important to apply to forage crops including red clover

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iso-osmotic salt concentrations did not affect potassium and magnesium ion contents of lettuce

Taxon: lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment: iso-osmotic salt concentrationse5
Outcome: K and Mg ion contentse5
Direction: did not affecte5

Verbatim

e1
“green and red lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–526

e5
“The treatments with iso-osmotic salt concentrations did not affect K and Mg ion contents but further increased LAA and resulted only in a moderate decrease of fresh yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1721

Title

Regulated Salinity Eustress in a Floating Hydroponic Module of Sequentially Harvested Lettuce Modulates Phytochemical Constitution, Plant Resilience, and Post-Harvest Nutraceutical Quality

Petronia Carillo; Georgios A. Soteriou; Marios C. Kyriacou; et al. Agronomy 2021. doi:10.3390/agronomy11061040

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline mineral water did not reduce the nutritive value of lettuce.

Taxon: lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment: Saline mineral watere0
Outcome: nutritive value of lettucee0
Direction: not reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Saline mineral water did not affect changes of lettuce yield, nor content of phosphorus, potassium, sodium, vitamin C, P-carotene and chlorophyll, but it led to the decrease of nitrogen content (especially of nitrite form) and the increase of magnesium, sulphur and chlorine. Nevertheless, the nutritive value of lettuce was not reduced.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–736

t0
“LETTUCE (LACTUCA SATIVA L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–50

Title

EFFECTS OF SALINITY ON LETTUCE (LACTUCA SATIVA L.) QUALITY

V Dragidevic; D Prodanovic; Slobodanka Sredojević Acta periodica technologica 2000

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Saline mineral water did not change lettuce yield in lettuce.
Intervention effect Saline mineral water did not change content of phosphorus in lettuce.
Intervention effect Saline mineral water did not change potassium in lettuce.
Intervention effect Saline mineral water did not change sodium in lettuce.
Intervention effect Saline mineral water did not change vitamin C in lettuce.
Intervention effect Saline mineral water did not change P-carotene in lettuce.
Intervention effect Saline mineral water did not change chlorophyll in lettuce.
Intervention effect Saline mineral water decreased lettuce nitrogen content, especially nitrite.
Intervention effect Saline mineral water increased lettuce magnesium.
Intervention effect Saline mineral water increased lettuce sulphur.
Intervention effect Saline mineral water increased lettuce chlorine.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was associated with no reduction in maize harvesting operations.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrowe0
Outcome: maize harvesting operationse0
Direction: did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting and the system in which crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow were feasible for straw production because they did not decrease corn grain yield and did not affect maize harvesting operations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1221

Title

Maize-crotalaria intercropping systems

Rafael Torres de Souza; Franciele Caroline de Assis Valadão; Daniel Dias Valadão Júnior; et al. Semina Ciências Agrárias 2019. doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n4p1455

Other claims from this paper (8)

Association C. spectabilis was more sensitive to water variation than C. ochroleuca.
Intervention effect Sowing crotalaria before maize with incorporated maize seeds increased phytomass.
Intervention effect Sowing crotalaria before maize with incorporated maize seeds decreased corn grain yield.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was feasible for straw production.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was associated with no reduction in corn grain yield.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was associated with no reduction in maize harvesting operations.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was feasible for straw production.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was associated with no reduction in corn grain yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 had no effect on seed size, harvest index or shelling percentage of peanut.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeae6
Treatment: elevated CO 2e1
Outcome: seed size, harvest index or shelling percentagee1
Direction: no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“There were no effects of elevated CO 2 on pollen viability, seed‐set, seed number per pod, seed size, harvest index or shelling percentage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–865

e6
“We conclude that there are no beneficial interactions between elevated CO 2 and temperature, and that seed yield of peanut will decrease under future warmer climates, particularly in regions where present temperatures are near or above optimum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1745

Title

Super‐optimal temperatures are detrimental to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) reproductive processes and yield at both ambient and elevated carbon dioxide

P. V. Vara Prasad; Kenneth J. Boote; L. Hartwell Allen; et al. Global Change Biology 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00708.x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin B12 had no significant influence on red clover shoot dry weight

Taxon: red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Treatment: vitamin B12e1
Outcome: shoot dry weighte4
Direction: no significant influencee4
Comparator: 0e7

Verbatim

e0
“the flowering and yield parameters of red clover (Trifolium pretense L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–110

e1
“vitamin B12 markedly led to (A) a decrease in the flowering time by 5 days (100.2 to 95.9 days)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–615

e4
“a boost in the root dry weight by 60% (3.8 to 6.4 g) while having no significant influence on the shoot dry weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–888

e7
“Two levels of vitamin B12 (0, 20 mg pot−1)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–409

Title

Phenology, Nitrogen Status, and Yield of Red Clover (Trifolium pretense L.) Affected by Application of Vitamin B12, Humic Acid, and Enriched Biochar

Dorna Saadat; Arthur Siller; Masoud Hashemi Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13122885

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Vitamin B12 decreased red clover flowering time by 5 days (100.2 to 95.9 days)
Intervention effect Co-application of vitamin B12 and humic acid further reduced flowering time to 84.5 days
Intervention effect Vitamin B12 increased the total number of red clover stems from 73.0 to 78.6 per plant
Intervention effect Vitamin B12 boosted red clover root dry weight by 60% (3.8 to 6.4 g)
Intervention effect Vitamin B12 decreased leaf trichome density of red clover by 30% (49.0 to 35.0 plant−1)
Intervention effect Vitamin B12 raised N content of red clover roots (107.8 to 173.3 mg plant−1)
Intervention effect Vitamin B12 had no influence on red clover shoot N content
Intervention effect Enriched biochar had minimal influence on red clover phenology and productivity
Recommendation Manure, naturally rich in vitamin B12 and humic acid, is important to apply to forage crops including red clover

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry fresh weight was unaffected by defoliation in Merlot.

Taxon: Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material: Merlote0
Treatment: defoliatione0
Outcome: berry fresh weighte0
Direction: unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Leaf removal decreased yield per vine and cluster weight in Merlot and Sangiovese. Cluster compactness was reduced with the severity of defoliation only in Merlot, due to a decrease in berry number per cluster; berry fresh weight was unaffected in both cultivars.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1010

t0
“Vitis vinifera L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113

Title

Effects of Severity of Post-flowering Leaf Removal on Berry Growth and Composition of Three Red Vitis vinifera L. Cultivars Grown under Semiarid Conditions

Yorgos Kotseridis; Afroditi Georgiadou; Panagiotis Tikos; et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2012. doi:10.1021/jf300605j

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Leaf removal decreased yield per vine in Merlot.
Intervention effect Leaf removal decreased cluster weight in Merlot.
Intervention effect Leaf removal decreased yield per vine in Sangiovese.
Intervention effect Leaf removal decreased cluster weight in Sangiovese.
Intervention effect Increasing defoliation severity reduced cluster compactness in Merlot.
Intervention effect Defoliation decreased berry number per cluster in Merlot.
Intervention effect Berry fresh weight was unaffected by defoliation in Sangiovese.
Intervention effect Leaf removal did not affect yield in Cabernet Sauvignon.
Intervention effect Leaf removal restrained berry size in Cabernet Sauvignon.
Association Seed mass followed berry mass variation except in Sangiovese.
Intervention effect Fruit zone leaf removal did not affect must soluble solids.
Intervention effect Fruit zone leaf removal increased titratable acidity only in Merlot.
Intervention effect Defoliation increased skin anthocyanins in Merlot, ordered FR above LR above ND.
Intervention effect Defoliation increased skin anthocyanins in Cabernet Sauvignon, ordered FR above LR above ND.
Intervention effect Defoliation significantly reduced seed flavan-3-ols.
Intervention effect Full leaf removal had lower seed flavan-3-ols than no defoliation in both varieties.
Intervention effect Lateral shoot removal gave the highest seed phenolic content in Sangiovese.
Intervention effect Post-flowering leaf removal improved overall berry composition in Merlot.
Intervention effect Post-flowering leaf removal improved overall berry composition in Cabernet Sauvignon.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry fresh weight was unaffected by defoliation in Sangiovese.

Taxon: Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material: Sangiovesee0
Treatment: defoliatione0
Outcome: berry fresh weighte0
Direction: unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Leaf removal decreased yield per vine and cluster weight in Merlot and Sangiovese. Cluster compactness was reduced with the severity of defoliation only in Merlot, due to a decrease in berry number per cluster; berry fresh weight was unaffected in both cultivars.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1010

t0
“Vitis vinifera L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113

Title

Effects of Severity of Post-flowering Leaf Removal on Berry Growth and Composition of Three Red Vitis vinifera L. Cultivars Grown under Semiarid Conditions

Yorgos Kotseridis; Afroditi Georgiadou; Panagiotis Tikos; et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2012. doi:10.1021/jf300605j

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Leaf removal decreased yield per vine in Merlot.
Intervention effect Leaf removal decreased cluster weight in Merlot.
Intervention effect Leaf removal decreased yield per vine in Sangiovese.
Intervention effect Leaf removal decreased cluster weight in Sangiovese.
Intervention effect Increasing defoliation severity reduced cluster compactness in Merlot.
Intervention effect Defoliation decreased berry number per cluster in Merlot.
Intervention effect Berry fresh weight was unaffected by defoliation in Merlot.
Intervention effect Leaf removal did not affect yield in Cabernet Sauvignon.
Intervention effect Leaf removal restrained berry size in Cabernet Sauvignon.
Association Seed mass followed berry mass variation except in Sangiovese.
Intervention effect Fruit zone leaf removal did not affect must soluble solids.
Intervention effect Fruit zone leaf removal increased titratable acidity only in Merlot.
Intervention effect Defoliation increased skin anthocyanins in Merlot, ordered FR above LR above ND.
Intervention effect Defoliation increased skin anthocyanins in Cabernet Sauvignon, ordered FR above LR above ND.
Intervention effect Defoliation significantly reduced seed flavan-3-ols.
Intervention effect Full leaf removal had lower seed flavan-3-ols than no defoliation in both varieties.
Intervention effect Lateral shoot removal gave the highest seed phenolic content in Sangiovese.
Intervention effect Post-flowering leaf removal improved overall berry composition in Merlot.
Intervention effect Post-flowering leaf removal improved overall berry composition in Cabernet Sauvignon.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watering every seven days did not affect corn cob weight without husks or weight per 100 seeds.

Taxon: CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: 7-day watering intervale1
Outcome: cob weight without husks, and weight per 100 seedse0
Direction: did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“it did not affect cob length, cob diameter, cob weight with husks, cob weight without husks, and weight per 100 seeds”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1145

e1
“the 7-day watering interval led to a decrease in the number of cobs”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1026

t0
“Corn (Zea mays L)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–60

Title

Properties of Rooting, Growth and Yield of Corn (Zea mays L) at Various Watering Intervals

Angela Patricia Kerawing; Sri Suryanti; Setyastuti Purwanti Purwanti JURNAL AGRONOMI TANAMAN TROPIKA (JUATIKA) 2024. doi:10.36378/juatika.v6i1.3398

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Watering every seven days increased corn root length.
Intervention effect Watering every seven days decreased the number of corn leaves.
Intervention effect Watering every seven days decreased the number of corn cobs.
Intervention effect Watering every seven days did not affect corn cob length, diameter, or weight with husks.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics