View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Cucumis sativus ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
But excessive fertilization also could cause the decrease of cucumber yield and quality.
Treatmentexcessive fertilization e0 Outcomecucumber yield and quality e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “But excessive fertilization also could cause the decrease of cucumber yield and quality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–776 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect under the same levels of nitrogen and potassium,increasing the ratio of organic fertilizer was helpful to the increase of cucumber yield and quality. Intervention effect The commercial quality and flavor of cucumber were improved with the increase of fertilizer Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect At the same time,the nitrate content in cucumber also increased rapidly. Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Moderately conductive irrigation water caused no appreciable yield decrease .
Treatmentwater with moderate electrical conductivity e0 Directionwithout an appreciable decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The cucumbers are irrigated with water with moderate electrical conductivity without an appreciable decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1346 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing cucumber density did not decrease weekly yield per area or total yield .
Treatmentreducing plant density e0 Outcomeweekly yield per unit area and total yield e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “reducing plant density did not significantly affect the photosynthesis of leaves and did not decrease weekly yield per unit area and total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–845 t0 “Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–76 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The screenhouse climate corresponded to a 50% decrease in cucumber fruit yield during spring/summer.
Outcomecrop fruit yield e0 Qualifierspring/summer period e0 Verbatim
e0 “These differences resulted in a 50% decrease in crop fruit yield during the spring/summer period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1356 t0 “Cucumber Fruit Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–49 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield rose as irrigation declined.
Treatmentdecrease of irrigation e0 Verbatim
e0 “Cucumber yield did not decrease but increased with the decrease of irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–396 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Melatonin alleviated the decrease in quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion in PS II under chilling stress.
Outcomequantum yield of photochemical energy conversion e1 Directionalleviation of the decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “effects of melatonin on photoinhibition under chilling stress in cucumber seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–125 e1 “alleviation of the decrease in quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1045 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Upon gravitropic stimulation the yield threshold of the lower half of the cucumber stem did not decrease .
Outcomeyield threshold of the lower half of the stem e6 Directiondid not decrease e6 Qualifierupon gravitropic stimulation e6 Verbatim
t0 “Gravitropism of cucumber hypocotyls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 e6 “From pressure-block experiments, it appeared that upon gravitropic stimulation (1) the yield threshold of the lower half of the stem did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1123 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity yield decrease ranged from 2.3 to 7.6% for each dS m-1 of EC.
Outcomesalinity yield decrease e7 Qualifierfor each dS m-1 e7 Verbatim
e0 “Tomatoes, cucumbers and sweet peppers (capsicums) were grown in hydroponic systems in which the nutrient solutions were recirculated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 e7 “salinity yield decrease values ranged from 2.3 to 7.6% for each dS m-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–950 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Additional iron did not decrease yield when nutrient-solution iron was sufficient.
Treatmentadditional iron supply e0 Directiondid not inhibit e0 Qualifieriron supply in the nutrient solution is sufficient e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “additional iron supply did not inhibit the growth and decrease the yield even if the iron supply in the nutrient solution is sufficient ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1136 e1 “cucumbers (Cucumis sativus cv. Jessica) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–217 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The model accurately predicted reduced cucumber fruit yield under shading.
Treatmentshading treatments e0 Outcomecucumber fruit yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The model also accurately predicted the decrease in cucumber fruit yield under low-sunlight conditions (shading treatments) and the increase in yield due to supplemental lighting. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1428 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.