View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
One simulated defoliation did not decrease cassava root yield .
A single defoliation e0 does not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A single defoliation of cassava (to simulate Z. variegatus feeding damage) does not decrease root yield , but additional ones do. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3181–3309 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed review summary negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mite damage was shown to decrease cassava root yield by up to 87%.
root and stake yield e1 Verbatim
t0 “The cassava mites ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 e1 “These arthropods cause three patterns of damage and have been shown to cause a decrease in root and stake yield of up to 87% and 82% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–333 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed review summary negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mite damage was shown to decrease cassava stake yield by up to 82%.
root and stake yield e1 Verbatim
t0 “The cassava mites ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 e1 “These arthropods cause three patterns of damage and have been shown to cause a decrease in root and stake yield of up to 87% and 82% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–333 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maryot2 showed the highest seed yield decrease (21.51) under water deficit in the first season.
decrease in seed yield e1 in the first season e1 Verbatim
t0 “SOME FABA BEAN CULTIVARS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 e1 “Maryot2 cultivar recorded the highest decrease in seed yield (21.51) in the first season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1529 Other claims from this paper (14) Association author interpretation original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Rust severity greater than 5% during the critical stage would substantially decrease final yield .
Rust severity greater than 5% e6 Uromyces viciae‐fabae e0 pathogen during that critical stage e6 Verbatim
e0 “Epidemics of faba bean rust (Uromyces viciae‐fabae ) differing in duration and final severity were induced by a point inoculation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 e6 “Rust severity greater than 5% during that critical stage would substantially decrease final yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1109 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments decrease d faba bean grain and biological yield .
Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments e2 grain yield and biological yield e2 Verbatim
e2 “Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments were decrease the grain yield and biological yield on pea and faba bean, and this decrease on pea was almost half over control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1250 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect Inorganic fertilizer (urea) increased faba bean grain yield to 2147 kg/ha, close to the control. Intervention effect Inorganic fertilizer (urea) increased faba bean biological yield to 4956 kg/ha, close to the control. Intervention effect Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments decreased pea grain and biological yield, by almost half compared with control. Intervention effect Bacteria inoculation gave the highest number of nodules per pea plant, 125.9, against 121.5 in the control. Intervention effect Differences in pea nodules per plant for the nitrogen treatment, 109.1, were not significant. Intervention effect Differences in pea nodules per plant for the Organic-1 treatment, 97.3, were not significant. Intervention effect Differences in pea nodules per plant for the Organic-2 treatment, 109.3, were not significant. Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected the number of nodules per pea plant. Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected the number of nodules per faba bean plant. Observation author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The disease causes a decrease in tobacco leaf yield .
tobacco leaf yield e1 Verbatim
t0 “Causing Leaf Spot on Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–75 e1 “The disease spreads widely and causes a decrease in tobacco leaf yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3314–3384 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Estimated yield decrease from pest defoliation was less than 1%.
Verbatim
e0 “The overall decrease in yield is estimated to be less than 1% by defoliation due to this pest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–652 e2 “Acherontia lachesis (F.)
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–64 t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–93 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed topping did not significantly decrease yield , grade index, or leaf chemistry.
delay in topping until four additional leaves were produced e0 yield, grade index, or leaf chemistry e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 e0 “The delay in topping until four additional leaves were produced did not significantly decrease yield , grade index, or leaf chemistry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1313 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield of hybrid rice combinations showed a wavelike decrease during grain filling.
development of seeds e1 wavelike decrease e1 Verbatim
e1 “Pn, Tr, Ci, Gs,Fv/Fm, ETR in leaves and Yield of different hybrid rice combinations during grain filling showed a wavelike decrease change with the development of seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–383 Other claims from this paper (7) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in spikelet number is one of the main reasons for the yield reduction under water deficit.
decrease of spikelets numbers e3 Verbatim
e0 “During panicle development stage of hybrid rice varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 e3 “The decrease of spikelets numbers is one of the main reasons leading to yield reduction ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–690 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
H1 showed a quicker decrease in the partitioning coefficient for blade over time.
partitioning coefficient for blade e7 quicker decrease e7 Verbatim
t0 “yield advantage in hybrid rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–98 e7 “for H1, there was quicker increase in the partitioning coefficient for internode and quicker decrease in the partitioning coefficient for blade ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1683 Other claims from this paper (18) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 1 mm decrease in seasonal precipitation corresponded to a 0.736 kg/ha decrease in pea yield .
total precipitation for the growing season e0 Verbatim
e0 “The 1 mm decrease in the total precipitation for the growing season will lead to a decrease in pea yield s by an average of 0.736 kg/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2186 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod number per plant was reduced with water deficit and mainly accounted for the yield decrease .
pod number per plant e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease was mainly due to reduced pod number per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–818 t0 “pea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–15 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage mostly decrease d pea yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Yield decrease in NT was mostly observed for winter wheat and pea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1170 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 1% increase in DSI was associated with a 0.49% decrease in greenhouse yield .
greenhouse conditions e7 Verbatim
e0 “Clubroot, caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae , is a major disease of canola (Brassica napus ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 e7 “Regression analysis indicated that under greenhouse conditions, an increment of 1% in DSI resulted in a decrease of 0.49% in yield ; under field conditions, this percentage was reduced to 0.26% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1418 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The oil- yield decrease at flowering to stem elongation exceeded that at other stages.
flowering stage to stem elongation stage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease of oil yield s at the flowering stage to stem elongation stage was more than the other stages. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1374 t0 “Canola (Brassica napus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–117 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fresh forage yield decrease d at later harvest dates, and the decrease varied among planting ratios.
harvested at later dates e3 Fresh forage yield e3 varied among planted ratios e3 Verbatim
t0 “Evaluation of Winter Canola for Forage Yield and Quality in Comparison to Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–79 e3 “Fresh forage yield harvested at later dates decrease d and this decrease varied among planted ratios particularly with increase of wheat ratio in the intercrop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–837 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Watermelon blight can decrease watermelon yield and quality.
watermelon yields and quality e0 Verbatim
e0 “Watermelon blight,an important soil-borne and seeds-borne disease,could decrease the watermelon yield s and quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 Mechanism author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Continuous watermelon cropping accumulates allelochemicals and decrease s yield .
continuous cropping e0 decrease of yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “The continuous cropping of watermelon〔Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.)Matsum.et Nakai〕leads to the accumulation of allelochemicals,and causes the decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156 Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The salinity effect was also predominant in the fluorescence decrease ratio (Rfd) and quantum yield of non-regulated energy dissipation Y(NO).
salinity levels e0 the ratio of the fluorescence decrease (Rfd), and quantum yield of non-regulated energy dissipation in PSII [Y(NO)] e1 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Grafted Watermelon Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–87 e0 “a notable effect of salinity levels on CF parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1105 e1 “the ratio of the fluorescence decrease (Rfd), and quantum yield of non-regulated energy dissipation in PSII [Y(NO)] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1305 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
These combinations did not significantly decrease yield .
Verbatim
e0 “without a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1025 t0 “Isabella grape variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–510 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Yield may decrease in the hottest Australian grape regions.
Verbatim
e0 “an increase in yield s may be expected in the coolest regions, while a decrease may be expected in the hottest regions. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1183 t0 “grape yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water logging and drought made the PSII yield decrease more precipitous.
Water stress (water logging and drought) e0 more precipitous decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water stress (water logging and drought) led to a more precipitous decrease , indicating an increased sensitivity of Y to the combined stresses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–829 t0 “grape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 Other claims from this paper (8) Association author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Hairiness of pepper could decrease the loss rate of economic yield .
hairiness character e6 loss rate of pepper economic yield e6 Verbatim
t0 “COMPARISON OF DROUGHT RESISTANCE OF PEPPER WITH DIFFERENT HAIRINESS CHARACTER UNDER DROUGHT STRESS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 e6 “hairiness character of pepper could decrease the loss rate of pepper economic yield effectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1131 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower well-water temperature was asserted to directly influence the pepper yield decrease .
Temperature of well water was lower than the allowed minimum e3 Verbatim
e0 “yield of pepper hybrids Cecil F1 and Bianca F1 in the early glasshouse production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–191 e3 “Temperature of well water was lower than the allowed minimum and therefore had direct influence on the yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–785 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Well-water irrigation decreased pepper crop yield relative to lagoon water. Intervention effect Irrigation water efficiency differed between the two water sources (P<0,05). Association Average fruit weight differed significantly between the two pepper hybrids (P<0,05). Association The two pepper hybrids reacted differently to lagoon and well water (significant interaction). Association Factor year did not significantly affect pepper crop yield in the controlled glasshouse. Intervention effect Well water had higher values than lagoon water for EC, sodium, potassium, calcium, chlorine, magnesium, bicarbonate, sulphate, iron and boron. Observation Well-water irrigation caused accumulation of slime and blocking of sprinklers. Observation Well-water irrigation disturbed soil structure and caused fruit deformation. Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Both rootstocks did not decrease scion vegetative growth, fruit yield or size.
both rootstocks e0 vegetative growth, fruit yield or the size of the scions e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “both rootstocks showed good compatibility with the different scions tested and did not decrease vegetative growth, fruit yield or the size of the scions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1362 t0 “pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–102 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
F4 and F5 mungbean populations showed a slight grain yield decrease .
slight decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “slight decrease in 'grain yield in subsequent populations of F4 and FS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–993 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–34 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease dry matter or seed yield per plant.
basal 25% defoliation e0 TDM and seed yield plant-1 e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
MYMV susceptible progenies had a 32.2 to 78.6 percent decrease in grain yield per plant.
grain yield per plant e0 32.2 to 78.6 percent e0 Verbatim
t0 “mungbean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–45 t1 “mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) wilczek) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–116 e0 “32.2 to 78.6 percent decrease in grain yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–494 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Manihot esculentae0.jpg?width=60)
Zonocerus variegatuse0pest
Vicia faba
Nicotiana tabacum
Acherontia lachesis
Oryza sativa
Lathyrus oleraceus.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica napus var. napus
Citrullus lanatus.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Vigna radiata