Paper · 1986 · Agronomy Journal

Leaf Number at Topping and Yield, Grade Index, and Leaf Chemistry of a Mammoth‐Type Tobacco1

Mark J. King

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.) cultivars containing a mammoth gene have not been evaluated at leaf numbers greater than 18 to 20 leaves per plant. In addition, they have not been evaluated with respect to potential for mechanical topping. Flue‐cured tobacco cultivar NC 22NF containing the mammoth gene, was grown in 1982, 1983, and 1984 at Blackstone, VA. Plants were topped (apical meristem removed) to determine the effect of leaf number per plant on yield, grade index, and leaf chemistry at constant soil fertility. Leaves remaining on the plant after topping were 14, 18, 22, and 26 per plant. Yield increased with leaf number. This study demonstrated that the accepted practice of topping at 18 to 20 leaves may be extended to 26 leaves, increasing yield and value with no detrimental alteration in leaf chemistry or decline in leaf grade index. The lack of difference in grade index compared to earlier studies may be due to the different genomes. In a duplicate set of treatments, four additional leaves per plant were allowed to develop before being removed to study the effects on yield, grade index, and leaf chemistry at 14, 18, 22, and 26 leaves per plant. The delay in topping until four additional leaves were produced did not significantly decrease yield, grade index, or leaf chemistry and may be advantageous for mechanical topping.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increased with leaf number.

Treatment
leaf numbere0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield increased with leaf number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping at 26 leaves increased yield and value without damaging leaf chemistry or grade index.

Treatment
26 leavese0
Outcome
yield and valuee0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
18 to 20 leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“topping at 18 to 20 leaves may be extended to 26 leaves, increasing yield and value with no detrimental alteration in leaf chemistry or decline in leaf grade index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed topping did not significantly decrease yield, grade index, or leaf chemistry.

Treatment
delay in topping until four additional leaves were producede0
Outcome
yield, grade index, or leaf chemistrye0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The delay in topping until four additional leaves were produced did not significantly decrease yield, grade index, or leaf chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1313 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.