View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At high populations, the decrease in barley grain yield was accompanied by a comparable decrease in grains per unit area.
high populations e1 number of grains per unit area e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 e1 “a decrease in grain yield at high populations was associated with a comparable decrease in the number of grains per unit area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1397 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The largest barley monoculture yield decrease occurred in years three to five.
3rd to 5th year e0 Verbatim
e0 “Experiments have further shown that the biggest yield decrease occurs in the 3rd to 5th year of barley monoculture. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1578 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reasons for the decrease in barley yield under permanent sowing were identified.
decrease in the yield of permanent sowing of barley e5 Verbatim
e5 “The reasons for the decrease in the yield of permanent sowing of barley have been identified ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1731 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little decrease in sunflower yield .
insect visits were reduced by 50% e0 little decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–693 e1 “in sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–220 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little sunflower yield decrease .
insect visits were reduced by 50% e0 little decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–695 t0 “in sunflower, combining a gradient in insect pollination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–264 Other claims from this paper (4) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that TE application is a potential strategy to decrease lodging probability without affecting sunflower yield .
application of TE e0 decrease lodging probability without affecting sunflower yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “the application of TE is a potential strategy to decrease lodging probability without affecting sunflower yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1054 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mogilev spring wheat had a climate-induced yield decrease of 17–30%.
climate-induced e1 Verbatim
e0 “In Mogilev region, this decrease was lower: spring wheat – 17–30 %, spring barley – 22–33 %, oats – 35–36 %. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–732 e1 “most of them were characterized by a climate-induced decrease in their yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–448 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Goodness of fit of relative yield decrease with mean CWSI was r 2 = 0.78 for the combined plantings.
relative Y decrease with mean CWSI e5 Verbatim
t0 “Spring Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 e5 “for relative Y decrease with mean CWSI, r 2 = 0.78 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1467 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Under optimal moisture, mixture yield did not decrease because spring wheat yield increased.
total yield of the mixture e0 did not decrease e0 With optimal moisture e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With optimal moisture, they reduced the yield of the vetch sowing, but the total yield of the mixture did not decrease due to the increase in the yield of spring wheat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–342 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
In the far future all regional climate models predicted a decrease of peanut yield .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 e0 “During the far future, all RCMs predict a decrease of the peanut yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1377 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Selection for yield could decrease meat and oil content.
meat and oil content e0 Verbatim
e0 “but would decrease meat and oil content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–1926 t0 “Peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in peanut yield was stronger under the RCP8.5 scenario.
RCP8.5 scenario e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 e0 “Moreover, this decrease is stronger for the RCP8.5 scenario ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1438 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
OSIRI did not significantly decrease sugarcane yield compared with the control method.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “without a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1172 t0 “OSIRI : a decision-marking tool for irrigation of sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–74 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing seed rate did not decrease cane yield .
reduction in seed rate e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cane yield did not decrease due to reduction in seed rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1214 t0 “sugarcane ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–106 t1 “sugarcane ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–106 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Post-harvest residues can decrease cane yield by 4.5-13.5 tlha.
Post-harvest residues e0 Verbatim
e0 “Post-harvest residues can decrease cane yield by 4.5-13.5 tlha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–157 t0 “SUGARCANE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
But excessive fertilization also could cause the decrease of cucumber yield and quality.
excessive fertilization e0 cucumber yield and quality e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “But excessive fertilization also could cause the decrease of cucumber yield and quality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–776 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect under the same levels of nitrogen and potassium,increasing the ratio of organic fertilizer was helpful to the increase of cucumber yield and quality. Intervention effect The commercial quality and flavor of cucumber were improved with the increase of fertilizer Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect At the same time,the nitrate content in cucumber also increased rapidly. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing cucumber density did not decrease weekly yield per area or total yield .
reducing plant density e0 weekly yield per unit area and total yield e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “reducing plant density did not significantly affect the photosynthesis of leaves and did not decrease weekly yield per unit area and total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–845 t0 “Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–76 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The screenhouse climate corresponded to a 50% decrease in cucumber fruit yield during spring/summer.
crop fruit yield e0 spring/summer period e0 Verbatim
e0 “These differences resulted in a 50% decrease in crop fruit yield during the spring/summer period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1356 t0 “Cucumber Fruit Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–49 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed review summary negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed competition can decrease alfalfa yield .
Verbatim
e0 “Weeds compete with alfalfa for water, nutrients, light, and space. This competition can decrease yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–103 Other claims from this paper (4) Association author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Salinity above 8 dS /m may decrease alfalfa yield by 50 %.
Verbatim
e0 “8 dS /m (4091 ppm, 70 mM), levels that may decrease alfalfa yield by 50 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–599 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The largest projected alfalfa yield decrease is 9% in Siirt.
Verbatim
e0 “the maximum yield decrease will be noted in Siirt (9%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1728 e1 “Alfalfa yield for years 2020-2060 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1052 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Also assuming uniform synthesis efficiency caused an additional 4% decrease in simulated yield .
assuming that Y g also was uniform e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “assuming that Y g also was uniform led to an additional decrease of 4% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1579 t0 “Sorghum Grain Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–34 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aging for up to 48 d was followed by a gradual decrease in sorghum yield .
aging of up to 48 d e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “this was followed by a gradual decrease in yield following aging of up to 48 d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–398 t0 “Accelerated Aging of Sorghum Seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–48 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum grain yield may decrease in the 2030s and 2050s under both RCP scenarios.
sorghum grain yield e0 2030s and 2050s under both RCPs scenarios e0 Verbatim
e0 “sorghum grain yield may decrease by 2030s and 2050s under both RCPs scenarios ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2523–2600 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource Calibration RMSE was 2 days for anthesis, 2 days for maturity, 478 kg ha −1 for grain yield and 912 kg ha −1 for biomass yield. Method / resource Calibration normalized nRMSE values were 2.74%, 1.6%, 13.42% and 5.91% respectively. Method / resource Evaluation R2 values were 78% for anthesis, 99% for maturity, 98% for biomass yield and 94% for grain yield. Method / resource Evaluation d-statistics were 0.87, 0.91, 0.67 and 0.98. Method / resource Evaluation nRMSE values were 2.6%, 2.7%, 23.4% and 4.1% for the respective parameters. Method / resource The model had a strong fit between simulated and observed values. Intervention effect Optimum nitrogen fertilizer may substantially increase sorghum yield. Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation may substantially increase sorghum yield. Intervention effect Early sowing may substantially increase sorghum yield. Recommendation Suitable crop management could reduce the adverse impact of projected climate change on sorghum production. Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046 t0 “Sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 t1 “decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–898 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046 t0 “Sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Greater growing-season rainfall appeared to decrease yield .
rainfall during the growing season e0 Verbatim
e0 “increasing amounts of rainfall during the growing season appeared to decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–660 t0 “sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each low-temperature day was associated with a 1% yield decrease .
low-temperature day e0 Verbatim
e0 “a low-temperature day with a 1% decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1056 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–112 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each post-flowering frost was associated with a 5% yield decrease .
post-flowering frost e0 Verbatim
e0 “Each post-flowering frost was associated with a 5% decrease and a low-temperature day with a 1% decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1056 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–112 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Increased plant number compensated for the decrease in yield components.
increased plant number e0 decrease of yield components e0 Verbatim
e0 “increased plant number compensated for decrease of yield components ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1174 t0 “Hashem chickpea variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0
Helianthus annuus
Triticum aestivum
Arachis hypogaea
Cucumis sativus
Medicago sativa
Sorghum
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Cicer arietinum