Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

19,998 matchesgrouped into 10,638 categories

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 3,624 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 31 earlier · 1910s–1940s

Refine

More filters

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS 14

Show all 14 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield components decreased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.

Taxon: sugarcanee0
Treatment: weed-crop competition periode5
Outcome: leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield componentse5
Direction: decreasee5

Verbatim

e0
“Effect of planting techniques and weed-crop competition periods on yield potential of spring planted sugarcane variety HSF-240 was studied at the Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–204

e5
“decrease in leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield components with an increase in weed-crop competition period”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1251

Title

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS

Muhammad Zafar; Asif Tanveer; Zahid Ata Cheema; et al. Pakistan Journal of Botany 2010

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Trench sowing increased leaf area index, average crop growth rate and yield-contributing attributes compared with flat sowing.
Association Weed population and biomass increased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 10.06% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 17.90% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.42% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 28.65% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 37.64% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 56.89% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 9.84% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 18.76% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.92% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 27.98% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 38.75% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 54.98% in 2006-07.
Observation The critical period of weed-crop competition in sugarcane was 45 days after sowing.
Recommendation The authors recommend trench sowing at 1.2 m row spacing as the better sowing technique.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 54.98% in 2006-07.

Taxon: sugarcanee0
Treatment: weedy checke1
Interactor: weede1weed
Outcome: stripped cane yielde7
Direction: decreasee7
Value: 54.98e7
Qualifier: 2006-07e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Effect of planting techniques and weed-crop competition periods on yield potential of spring planted sugarcane variety HSF-240 was studied at the Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–204

e7
“In 2006-07, the respective decrease in stripped cane yield was 9.84, 18.76, 22.92, 27.98, 38.75, and 54.98%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1592

e1
“weed-crop competition periods of 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 DAS and weedy check”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1424

Title

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS

Muhammad Zafar; Asif Tanveer; Zahid Ata Cheema; et al. Pakistan Journal of Botany 2010

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Trench sowing increased leaf area index, average crop growth rate and yield-contributing attributes compared with flat sowing.
Association Weed population and biomass increased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Association Leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield components decreased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 10.06% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 17.90% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.42% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 28.65% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 37.64% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 56.89% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 9.84% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 18.76% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.92% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 27.98% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 38.75% in 2006-07.
Observation The critical period of weed-crop competition in sugarcane was 45 days after sowing.
Recommendation The authors recommend trench sowing at 1.2 m row spacing as the better sowing technique.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 9.84% in 2006-07.

Taxon: sugarcanee0
Treatment: weed-crop competition periodse1
Interactor: weede1weed
Outcome: stripped cane yielde7
Direction: decreasee7
Value: 9.84e7
Qualifier: 2006-07e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Effect of planting techniques and weed-crop competition periods on yield potential of spring planted sugarcane variety HSF-240 was studied at the Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–204

e7
“In 2006-07, the respective decrease in stripped cane yield was 9.84, 18.76, 22.92, 27.98, 38.75, and 54.98%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1592

e1
“weed-crop competition periods of 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 DAS and weedy check”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1424

Title

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS

Muhammad Zafar; Asif Tanveer; Zahid Ata Cheema; et al. Pakistan Journal of Botany 2010

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Trench sowing increased leaf area index, average crop growth rate and yield-contributing attributes compared with flat sowing.
Association Weed population and biomass increased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Association Leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield components decreased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 10.06% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 17.90% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.42% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 28.65% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 37.64% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 56.89% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 18.76% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.92% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 27.98% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 38.75% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 54.98% in 2006-07.
Observation The critical period of weed-crop competition in sugarcane was 45 days after sowing.
Recommendation The authors recommend trench sowing at 1.2 m row spacing as the better sowing technique.

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14

Show all 14 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control grain yield was 48.0% below the full package.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment: controle0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 48.0e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2 and 48.0 (control), per cent”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1030

t0
“pearl millet”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced grain yield 12.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced grain yield 7.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning and gap filling reduced grain yield 16.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding and hoeing reduced grain yield 30.1%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced grain yield 20.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting fertilizer reduced stover yield 22.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced stover yield 7.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced stover yield 4.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning reduced stover yield 10.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding reduced stover yield 18.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced stover yield 16.0%.
Intervention effect Control stover yield was 32.2% below the full package.
Intervention effect Full package significantly increased N, P, K and protein contents and uptake in grain and stover.
Intervention effect Grain nitrogen content rose from 1.66% under control to 1.84% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain phosphorus content rose from 0.24% under control to 0.31% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain potassium content was highest under T1 at 0.60% versus 0.53% under T8.
Observation Full package yielded highest total N, P and K uptake at 129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Grain protein content increased from 10.4% under control to 11.5% under T1.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting ZnSO4 reduced stover yield 7.9%.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome: stover yielde0
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 7.9e0
Comparator: T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126

t0
“pearl millet”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94

e1
“caused a decrease in grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced grain yield 12.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced grain yield 7.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning and gap filling reduced grain yield 16.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding and hoeing reduced grain yield 30.1%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced grain yield 20.2%.
Intervention effect Control grain yield was 48.0% below the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting fertilizer reduced stover yield 22.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced stover yield 4.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning reduced stover yield 10.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding reduced stover yield 18.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced stover yield 16.0%.
Intervention effect Control stover yield was 32.2% below the full package.
Intervention effect Full package significantly increased N, P, K and protein contents and uptake in grain and stover.
Intervention effect Grain nitrogen content rose from 1.66% under control to 1.84% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain phosphorus content rose from 0.24% under control to 0.31% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain potassium content was highest under T1 at 0.60% versus 0.53% under T8.
Observation Full package yielded highest total N, P and K uptake at 129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Grain protein content increased from 10.4% under control to 11.5% under T1.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting biomix reduced stover yield 4.0%.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome: stover yielde0
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 4.0e0
Comparator: T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126

t0
“pearl millet”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94

e1
“caused a decrease in grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced grain yield 12.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced grain yield 7.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning and gap filling reduced grain yield 16.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding and hoeing reduced grain yield 30.1%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced grain yield 20.2%.
Intervention effect Control grain yield was 48.0% below the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting fertilizer reduced stover yield 22.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced stover yield 7.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning reduced stover yield 10.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding reduced stover yield 18.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced stover yield 16.0%.
Intervention effect Control stover yield was 32.2% below the full package.
Intervention effect Full package significantly increased N, P, K and protein contents and uptake in grain and stover.
Intervention effect Grain nitrogen content rose from 1.66% under control to 1.84% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain phosphorus content rose from 0.24% under control to 0.31% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain potassium content was highest under T1 at 0.60% versus 0.53% under T8.
Observation Full package yielded highest total N, P and K uptake at 129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Grain protein content increased from 10.4% under control to 11.5% under T1.

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14

Show all 14 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control without any of the production factors decreased grain yield by 48.0% relative to the full package T1.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment: controle1
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 48.0e1
Comparator: T1 (FPP)e1

Verbatim

e0
“on the grain productivity of pearl millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–278

e1
“Non-adoption of individual factors RDF (T2), ZnSO4 (T3), biomix (T4), thinning and gap filling (T5), weeding and hoeing (T6) and irrigation (T7) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2, 48.0 (control) per cent and stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T1 (FPP), respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–1057

Title

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2014

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased grain yield by 32.8% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased grain yield by 12.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased grain yield by 7.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased grain yield by 16.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased grain yield by 30.1% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased grain yield by 20.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased stover yield by 22.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased stover yield by 7.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased stover yield by 4.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased stover yield by 10.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased stover yield by 18.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased stover yield by 16.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased stover yield by 32.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum gross returns (Rs. 48727/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum net returns (Rs. 16926/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio (1.53), with T4 ranked next.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control without any of the production factors decreased stover yield by 32.2% relative to the full package T1.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment: controle1
Outcome: stover yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 32.2e1
Comparator: T1 (FPP)e1

Verbatim

e0
“on the grain productivity of pearl millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–278

e1
“Non-adoption of individual factors RDF (T2), ZnSO4 (T3), biomix (T4), thinning and gap filling (T5), weeding and hoeing (T6) and irrigation (T7) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2, 48.0 (control) per cent and stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T1 (FPP), respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–1057

Title

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2014

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased grain yield by 32.8% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased grain yield by 12.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased grain yield by 7.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased grain yield by 16.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased grain yield by 30.1% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased grain yield by 20.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased grain yield by 48.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased stover yield by 22.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased stover yield by 7.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased stover yield by 4.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased stover yield by 10.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased stover yield by 18.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased stover yield by 16.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum gross returns (Rs. 48727/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum net returns (Rs. 16926/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio (1.53), with T4 ranked next.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased grain yield by 32.8% relative to the full package T1.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment: RDF (T2)e1
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 32.8e1
Qualifier: Non-adoption of individual factorse1
Comparator: T1 (FPP)e1

Verbatim

e0
“on the grain productivity of pearl millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–278

e1
“Non-adoption of individual factors RDF (T2), ZnSO4 (T3), biomix (T4), thinning and gap filling (T5), weeding and hoeing (T6) and irrigation (T7) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2, 48.0 (control) per cent and stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T1 (FPP), respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–1057

Title

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2014

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased grain yield by 12.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased grain yield by 7.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased grain yield by 16.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased grain yield by 30.1% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased grain yield by 20.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased grain yield by 48.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased stover yield by 22.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased stover yield by 7.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased stover yield by 4.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased stover yield by 10.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased stover yield by 18.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased stover yield by 16.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased stover yield by 32.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum gross returns (Rs. 48727/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum net returns (Rs. 16926/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio (1.53), with T4 ranked next.

The reasons for the decrease in the feld crops yield against the background of ﬂat-cut basic tillage 14

Show all 14 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the authors’ experiment, spring crop mean yield also fell by 9.0%.

Taxon: soybeans – spring rape – spring wheat – oil ﬂax – spring barleye1
Treatment: ﬂat-cut looseninge2
Outcome: average yield of spring cropse0
Direction: decreasede0
Comparator: plowinge2

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0
“In our experience, the average yield of spring crops decreased by the same amount”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–606

e1
“soybeans – spring rape – spring wheat – oil ﬂax – spring barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–417

e2
“replacing the main processing of moldboard plowing with ﬂat-cut loosening”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–206

Title

The reasons for the decrease in the feld crops yield against the background of ﬂat-cut basic tillage

V. Yeshchenko; G. Koval; M. Kalievsky Agrobìologìâ 2021. doi:10.33245/2310-9270-2021-163-1-49-58

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Replacing plowing with flat-cut loosening decreased mean yield across 15 crops by 9.0%.
Intervention effect Across 15 experiments, arable-layer soil density changed by only 0.7%.
Intervention effect Across 15 experiments, agronomically valuable soil structure content changed by only 0.1%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, soil density improved by 2.1%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, soil structure improved by 1.4%.
Intervention effect Flat-cut tillage decreased total arable-layer soil permeability by 1.9%, while it stayed acceptable.
Intervention effect Five of 15 publications reported lower root-layer available moisture after non-moldboard loosening.
Intervention effect The remaining 10 publications reported unchanged or increased available moisture.
Intervention effect Available soil moisture under flat-cut loosening was 1.7% higher than under plowing.
Intervention effect At mid-season, flat-cut cultivation gave a 6.1% advantage in available moisture.
Intervention effect At season end, flat-cut cultivation gave a 6.4% advantage in available moisture.
Intervention effect Crop-rotation productivity with flat-cut cultivation was significantly 9.0% lower than with plowing.
Intervention effect Crops had 27–31% higher weed infestation after moldboard-free autumn tillage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing plowing with flat-cut loosening decreased mean yield across 15 crops by 9.0%.

Taxon: soybeans – spring rape – spring wheat – oil ﬂax – spring barleye1
Treatment: ﬂat-cut looseninge2
Outcome: average yielde0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 9.0 %e0
Comparator: moldboard plowinge2

Verbatim

e0
“the average yield of 15 crops decreased by 9.0 % due to such replacement”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–523

e1
“soybeans – spring rape – spring wheat – oil ﬂax – spring barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–417

e2
“replacing the main processing of moldboard plowing with ﬂat-cut loosening”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–206

Title

The reasons for the decrease in the feld crops yield against the background of ﬂat-cut basic tillage

V. Yeshchenko; G. Koval; M. Kalievsky Agrobìologìâ 2021. doi:10.33245/2310-9270-2021-163-1-49-58

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, spring crop mean yield also fell by 9.0%.
Intervention effect Across 15 experiments, arable-layer soil density changed by only 0.7%.
Intervention effect Across 15 experiments, agronomically valuable soil structure content changed by only 0.1%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, soil density improved by 2.1%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, soil structure improved by 1.4%.
Intervention effect Flat-cut tillage decreased total arable-layer soil permeability by 1.9%, while it stayed acceptable.
Intervention effect Five of 15 publications reported lower root-layer available moisture after non-moldboard loosening.
Intervention effect The remaining 10 publications reported unchanged or increased available moisture.
Intervention effect Available soil moisture under flat-cut loosening was 1.7% higher than under plowing.
Intervention effect At mid-season, flat-cut cultivation gave a 6.1% advantage in available moisture.
Intervention effect At season end, flat-cut cultivation gave a 6.4% advantage in available moisture.
Intervention effect Crop-rotation productivity with flat-cut cultivation was significantly 9.0% lower than with plowing.
Intervention effect Crops had 27–31% higher weed infestation after moldboard-free autumn tillage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across 15 experiments, agronomically valuable soil structure content changed by only 0.1%.

Taxon: soybeans – spring rape – spring wheat – oil ﬂax – spring barleye1
Treatment: ﬂat-cut cultivatione2
Outcome: content of agronomically valuable structurese0
Value: 0.1 %e0
Comparator: plowinge2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“the content of agronomically valuable structures – only by 0.1 %”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1073

e1
“soybeans – spring rape – spring wheat – oil ﬂax – spring barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–417

e2
“ﬂat-cut cultivation instead of plowing”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–745

Title

The reasons for the decrease in the feld crops yield against the background of ﬂat-cut basic tillage

V. Yeshchenko; G. Koval; M. Kalievsky Agrobìologìâ 2021. doi:10.33245/2310-9270-2021-163-1-49-58

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Replacing plowing with flat-cut loosening decreased mean yield across 15 crops by 9.0%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, spring crop mean yield also fell by 9.0%.
Intervention effect Across 15 experiments, arable-layer soil density changed by only 0.7%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, soil density improved by 2.1%.
Intervention effect In the authors’ experiment, soil structure improved by 1.4%.
Intervention effect Flat-cut tillage decreased total arable-layer soil permeability by 1.9%, while it stayed acceptable.
Intervention effect Five of 15 publications reported lower root-layer available moisture after non-moldboard loosening.
Intervention effect The remaining 10 publications reported unchanged or increased available moisture.
Intervention effect Available soil moisture under flat-cut loosening was 1.7% higher than under plowing.
Intervention effect At mid-season, flat-cut cultivation gave a 6.1% advantage in available moisture.
Intervention effect At season end, flat-cut cultivation gave a 6.4% advantage in available moisture.
Intervention effect Crop-rotation productivity with flat-cut cultivation was significantly 9.0% lower than with plowing.
Intervention effect Crops had 27–31% higher weed infestation after moldboard-free autumn tillage.

Super‐optimal temperatures are detrimental to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) reproductive processes and yield at both ambient and elevated carbon dioxide 13

Show all 13 →

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield of peanut is projected to decrease under future warmer climates.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeae6
Treatment: future warmer climatese6
Outcome: seed yielde6
Direction: decreasee6

Verbatim

e6
“We conclude that there are no beneficial interactions between elevated CO 2 and temperature, and that seed yield of peanut will decrease under future warmer climates, particularly in regions where present temperatures are near or above optimum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1745

Title

Super‐optimal temperatures are detrimental to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) reproductive processes and yield at both ambient and elevated carbon dioxide

P. V. Vara Prasad; Kenneth J. Boote; L. Hartwell Allen; et al. Global Change Biology 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00708.x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Doubling CO2 increased leaf photosynthesis of peanut relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 increased seed yield of peanut relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 had no effect on pollen viability, seed-set or seed number per pod of peanut.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 had no effect on seed size, harvest index or shelling percentage of peanut.
Intervention effect At ambient CO2, seed yield of peanut decreased by 14% as temperature rose from 32/22 to 36/26°C.
Intervention effect At ambient CO2, seed yield of peanut decreased by 59% as temperature rose from 32/22 to 40/30°C.
Intervention effect At ambient CO2, seed yield of peanut decreased by 90% as temperature rose from 32/22 to 44/34°C.
Intervention effect Seed yield of peanut decreased by similar percentages at temperatures above 32/22 under elevated CO2, despite greater photosynthesis and vegetative growth.
Mechanism Decreased seed yield of peanut at high temperature resulted from lower seed-set due to poor pollen viability.
Mechanism Smaller seed size of peanut at high temperature resulted from decreased seed growth rates and decreased shelling percentages.
Intervention effect Seed harvest index of peanut decreased from 0.41 to 0.05 as temperature increased from 32/22 to 44/34°C under both ambient and elevated CO2.
Association There are no beneficial interactions between elevated CO2 and temperature for peanut seed yield.

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

There are no beneficial interactions between elevated CO2 and temperature for peanut seed yield.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeae6
Treatment: elevated CO 2 and temperaturee6
Outcome: seed yielde6
Direction: no_changeinferrede6

Verbatim

e6
“We conclude that there are no beneficial interactions between elevated CO 2 and temperature, and that seed yield of peanut will decrease under future warmer climates, particularly in regions where present temperatures are near or above optimum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1745

Title

Super‐optimal temperatures are detrimental to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) reproductive processes and yield at both ambient and elevated carbon dioxide

P. V. Vara Prasad; Kenneth J. Boote; L. Hartwell Allen; et al. Global Change Biology 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00708.x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Doubling CO2 increased leaf photosynthesis of peanut relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 increased seed yield of peanut relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 had no effect on pollen viability, seed-set or seed number per pod of peanut.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 had no effect on seed size, harvest index or shelling percentage of peanut.
Intervention effect At ambient CO2, seed yield of peanut decreased by 14% as temperature rose from 32/22 to 36/26°C.
Intervention effect At ambient CO2, seed yield of peanut decreased by 59% as temperature rose from 32/22 to 40/30°C.
Intervention effect At ambient CO2, seed yield of peanut decreased by 90% as temperature rose from 32/22 to 44/34°C.
Intervention effect Seed yield of peanut decreased by similar percentages at temperatures above 32/22 under elevated CO2, despite greater photosynthesis and vegetative growth.
Mechanism Decreased seed yield of peanut at high temperature resulted from lower seed-set due to poor pollen viability.
Mechanism Smaller seed size of peanut at high temperature resulted from decreased seed growth rates and decreased shelling percentages.
Intervention effect Seed harvest index of peanut decreased from 0.41 to 0.05 as temperature increased from 32/22 to 44/34°C under both ambient and elevated CO2.
Association Seed yield of peanut is projected to decrease under future warmer climates.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At ambient CO2, seed yield of peanut decreased by 14% as temperature rose from 32/22 to 36/26°C.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeae6
Treatment: 36/26e2
Outcome: seed yielde2
Direction: decreasede2
Value: 14%e2
Qualifier: At ambient CO 2e2
Comparator: 32/22e2

Verbatim

e2
“At ambient CO 2 , seed yield decreased progressively by 14%, 59% and 90% as temperature increased from 32/22 to 36/26, 40/30 and 44/34°C, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1017

e6
“We conclude that there are no beneficial interactions between elevated CO 2 and temperature, and that seed yield of peanut will decrease under future warmer climates, particularly in regions where present temperatures are near or above optimum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1745

Title

Super‐optimal temperatures are detrimental to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) reproductive processes and yield at both ambient and elevated carbon dioxide

P. V. Vara Prasad; Kenneth J. Boote; L. Hartwell Allen; et al. Global Change Biology 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00708.x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Doubling CO2 increased leaf photosynthesis of peanut relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 increased seed yield of peanut relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 had no effect on pollen viability, seed-set or seed number per pod of peanut.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 had no effect on seed size, harvest index or shelling percentage of peanut.
Intervention effect At ambient CO2, seed yield of peanut decreased by 59% as temperature rose from 32/22 to 40/30°C.
Intervention effect At ambient CO2, seed yield of peanut decreased by 90% as temperature rose from 32/22 to 44/34°C.
Intervention effect Seed yield of peanut decreased by similar percentages at temperatures above 32/22 under elevated CO2, despite greater photosynthesis and vegetative growth.
Mechanism Decreased seed yield of peanut at high temperature resulted from lower seed-set due to poor pollen viability.
Mechanism Smaller seed size of peanut at high temperature resulted from decreased seed growth rates and decreased shelling percentages.
Intervention effect Seed harvest index of peanut decreased from 0.41 to 0.05 as temperature increased from 32/22 to 44/34°C under both ambient and elevated CO2.
Association There are no beneficial interactions between elevated CO2 and temperature for peanut seed yield.
Association Seed yield of peanut is projected to decrease under future warmer climates.

Liming can decrease legume crop yield and leaf gas exchange by enhancing root to shoot ABA signalling 13

Show all 13 →

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming decreased phosphorus concentration in root xylem sap and leaves.

Taxon: field bean (Vicia faba L. cv. Fuego)Vicia fabae1
Organ / stage: root xylem sap and leaf tissuee0
Outcome: phosphorus concentratione0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“Ionomic analysis of root xylem sap and leaf tissue revealed a decrease in phosphorus concentration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–826

e1
“field bean (Vicia faba L. cv. Fuego)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–444

Title

Liming can decrease legume crop yield and leaf gas exchange by enhancing root to shoot ABA signalling

Shane A. Rothwell; E. David Elphinstone; Ian C. Dodd Journal of Experimental Botany 2015. doi:10.1093/jxb/erv042

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Recommended liming reduced field bean pod yield by about 30%.
Intervention effect Liming reduced V. faba stomatal conductance by 63%.
Intervention effect Liming reduced bean stomatal conductance by 26%.
Intervention effect Liming reduced pea stomatal conductance by 59%.
Intervention effect Liming reduced shoot dry biomass by 16–24% across the three legume species.
Association Lower phosphorus concentration correlated with lower stomatal conductance.
Intervention effect Superphosphate partly reversed the phosphorus decline.
Intervention effect Superphosphate partly reversed the stomatal-conductance decline.
Mechanism In pea, lime-induced low phosphorus appeared to raise systemic ABA and reduce leaf gas exchange.
Intervention effect Synthetic ABA supplied through the transpiration stream reduced detached pea-leaf transpiration.
Intervention effect ABA-deficient wilty pea stomatal conductance did not respond to liming.
Recommendation The authors question current liming recommendations.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower phosphorus concentration correlated with lower stomatal conductance.

Taxon: field bean (Vicia faba L. cv. Fuego)Vicia fabae1
Compound: phosphoruse0
Outcome: decreased g(s)e0
Direction: decreasede0

Verbatim

e0
“decrease in phosphorus concentration that was correlated with decreased g(s)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–866

e1
“field bean (Vicia faba L. cv. Fuego)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–444

Title

Liming can decrease legume crop yield and leaf gas exchange by enhancing root to shoot ABA signalling

Shane A. Rothwell; E. David Elphinstone; Ian C. Dodd Journal of Experimental Botany 2015. doi:10.1093/jxb/erv042

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Recommended liming reduced field bean pod yield by about 30%.
Intervention effect Liming reduced V. faba stomatal conductance by 63%.
Intervention effect Liming reduced bean stomatal conductance by 26%.
Intervention effect Liming reduced pea stomatal conductance by 59%.
Intervention effect Liming reduced shoot dry biomass by 16–24% across the three legume species.
Observation Liming decreased phosphorus concentration in root xylem sap and leaves.
Intervention effect Superphosphate partly reversed the phosphorus decline.
Intervention effect Superphosphate partly reversed the stomatal-conductance decline.
Mechanism In pea, lime-induced low phosphorus appeared to raise systemic ABA and reduce leaf gas exchange.
Intervention effect Synthetic ABA supplied through the transpiration stream reduced detached pea-leaf transpiration.
Intervention effect ABA-deficient wilty pea stomatal conductance did not respond to liming.
Recommendation The authors question current liming recommendations.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended liming reduced field bean pod yield by about 30%.

Taxon: field bean (Vicia faba L. cv. Fuego)Vicia fabae0
Treatment: recommended liming ratese0
Outcome: pod yielde0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: ~30%e0
Setting: sandy loam soile0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“recommended liming rates to a sandy loam soil (increasing soil pH from 5.5 to 6.2) decreased pod yield of field bean (Vicia faba L. cv. Fuego) by ~30%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–452

Title

Liming can decrease legume crop yield and leaf gas exchange by enhancing root to shoot ABA signalling

Shane A. Rothwell; E. David Elphinstone; Ian C. Dodd Journal of Experimental Botany 2015. doi:10.1093/jxb/erv042

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Liming reduced V. faba stomatal conductance by 63%.
Intervention effect Liming reduced bean stomatal conductance by 26%.
Intervention effect Liming reduced pea stomatal conductance by 59%.
Intervention effect Liming reduced shoot dry biomass by 16–24% across the three legume species.
Observation Liming decreased phosphorus concentration in root xylem sap and leaves.
Association Lower phosphorus concentration correlated with lower stomatal conductance.
Intervention effect Superphosphate partly reversed the phosphorus decline.
Intervention effect Superphosphate partly reversed the stomatal-conductance decline.
Mechanism In pea, lime-induced low phosphorus appeared to raise systemic ABA and reduce leaf gas exchange.
Intervention effect Synthetic ABA supplied through the transpiration stream reduced detached pea-leaf transpiration.
Intervention effect ABA-deficient wilty pea stomatal conductance did not respond to liming.
Recommendation The authors question current liming recommendations.

Estimation of the Rate of Yield Decrease and Characteristics of Damage in Rice Plant Exposed to Salty Winds of Typhoon No. 15, 2004 13

Show all 13 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At equal branch withering, Haenuki tended to lose more yield than Sasanishiki or Hitomebore.

Taxon: Rice PlantOryza sativat0
Material: はえぬきe0
Outcome: 減収率e0
Direction: 高くなるe0
Comparator: ササニシキe0

Verbatim

e0
“同じ枝梗枯れ数歩合でも減収率は, 「はえぬき」が「ササニシキ」・「ひとめぼれ」に比べて高くなる傾向であり関係式が2本になった”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–579

t0
“Rice Plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84

Title

Estimation of the Rate of Yield Decrease and Characteristics of Damage in Rice Plant Exposed to Salty Winds of Typhoon No. 15, 2004

Shizuka Mori; Hiroyuki Matuda; Yasushi Shibata; et al. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 2008. doi:10.1626/jcs.77.13

Other claims from this paper (12)

Association Branch withering rose with sodium chloride up to 1 mg per panicle.
Observation At one mg sodium chloride or more, branch withering was around 80% or higher.
Association Ripening percentage declined with greater branch withering.
Association Whole grain percentage declined with greater branch withering.
Association Brown rice protein tended to increase with branch withering.
Association Brown rice weight tended to decline with branch withering.
Association Broken rice weight tended to increase with branch withering.
Observation Relative brown rice weight was 82 for Sasanishiki and Hitomebore.
Observation Relative brown rice weight was 66 for Haenuki.
Observation Relative brown rice weight was 54 for Koshihikari.
Association Broken rice weight and grain thickness fraction were highly correlated with brown rice weight.
Association Grain number per square meter had a low correlation with brown rice weight.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ripening percentage declined with greater branch withering.

Taxon: Rice PlantOryza sativat0
Outcome: 登熟歩合e0
Direction: 低下したe0
Comparator: 枝梗枯れ数歩合e0

Verbatim

e0
“登熟歩合と整粒歩合は各品種とも枝梗枯れ数歩合が高いほど低下した”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–199

t0
“Rice Plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84

Title

Estimation of the Rate of Yield Decrease and Characteristics of Damage in Rice Plant Exposed to Salty Winds of Typhoon No. 15, 2004

Shizuka Mori; Hiroyuki Matuda; Yasushi Shibata; et al. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 2008. doi:10.1626/jcs.77.13

Other claims from this paper (12)

Association Branch withering rose with sodium chloride up to 1 mg per panicle.
Observation At one mg sodium chloride or more, branch withering was around 80% or higher.
Association Whole grain percentage declined with greater branch withering.
Association Brown rice protein tended to increase with branch withering.
Association Brown rice weight tended to decline with branch withering.
Association Broken rice weight tended to increase with branch withering.
Observation Relative brown rice weight was 82 for Sasanishiki and Hitomebore.
Observation Relative brown rice weight was 66 for Haenuki.
Observation Relative brown rice weight was 54 for Koshihikari.
Association Broken rice weight and grain thickness fraction were highly correlated with brown rice weight.
Association Grain number per square meter had a low correlation with brown rice weight.
Association At equal branch withering, Haenuki tended to lose more yield than Sasanishiki or Hitomebore.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole grain percentage declined with greater branch withering.

Taxon: Rice PlantOryza sativat0
Outcome: 整粒歩合e0
Direction: 低下したe0
Comparator: 枝梗枯れ数歩合e0

Verbatim

e0
“登熟歩合と整粒歩合は各品種とも枝梗枯れ数歩合が高いほど低下した”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–199

t0
“Rice Plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84

Title

Estimation of the Rate of Yield Decrease and Characteristics of Damage in Rice Plant Exposed to Salty Winds of Typhoon No. 15, 2004

Shizuka Mori; Hiroyuki Matuda; Yasushi Shibata; et al. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 2008. doi:10.1626/jcs.77.13

Other claims from this paper (12)

Association Branch withering rose with sodium chloride up to 1 mg per panicle.
Observation At one mg sodium chloride or more, branch withering was around 80% or higher.
Association Ripening percentage declined with greater branch withering.
Association Brown rice protein tended to increase with branch withering.
Association Brown rice weight tended to decline with branch withering.
Association Broken rice weight tended to increase with branch withering.
Observation Relative brown rice weight was 82 for Sasanishiki and Hitomebore.
Observation Relative brown rice weight was 66 for Haenuki.
Observation Relative brown rice weight was 54 for Koshihikari.
Association Broken rice weight and grain thickness fraction were highly correlated with brown rice weight.
Association Grain number per square meter had a low correlation with brown rice weight.
Association At equal branch withering, Haenuki tended to lose more yield than Sasanishiki or Hitomebore.

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties 13

Show all 13 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: BKT, TOBe0
Treatment: waterlogging treatmente0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: controlse0

Verbatim

e0
“The waterlogging treatment resulted in a significant decrease in plant biomass (BKT, TOB), number of spikes (TOB), grain yield (BKT, TOB), water use (BTK) and water-use efficiency (TOB, MAM, PAL) compared to the controls.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–910

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: WL + De0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: in all varietiese0
Comparator: control treatment (C)t1

Verbatim

e0
“The combined treatment (WL + D) led to a significant decrease in plant height (BTK, MAM, KAR), number of spikes (BTK, TOB, MAM, KAR), thousand kernel weight (TOB), harvest index (BTK), biomass, grain yield, water-use efficiency (in all varieties) and water use (BKT, TOB, MAM, KAR) of the plants.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1207

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

t1
“control treatment (C)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–374

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: BTKe0
Treatment: waterlogging treatmente0
Outcome: water usee0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: controlse0

Verbatim

e0
“The waterlogging treatment resulted in a significant decrease in plant biomass (BKT, TOB), number of spikes (TOB), grain yield (BKT, TOB), water use (BTK) and water-use efficiency (TOB, MAM, PAL) compared to the controls.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–910

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Identification of the effectiveness of associative rhizobacteria in spring wheat cultivation 13

Show all 13 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed root rot development by 19% relative to control.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11e0
Interactor: Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome: root rot developmente0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 19%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80

e0
“The maximum increase in wheat yield (by 67% to the control), associated with a decrease in the root rot development by 19%, an increase in the productive bushiness by 18%, the spike weight by 26%, in the grains number per spike by 8% was noted when using the Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–290

Title

Identification of the effectiveness of associative rhizobacteria in spring wheat cultivation

Kolesnikov, L.E.; Belimov, A.A.; Kudryavtseva, E.Y.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2021. doi:10.15159/ar.21.145

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed wheat yield by 67% relative to control.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed productive bushiness by 18% relative to control.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed spike weight by 26% relative to control.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed grains number per spike by 8% relative to control.
Intervention effect The strain had an insignificant effect on leaf diseases of 2–5%.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in total bushiness of 59% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in plants vegetative part weight of 27% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in flag leaf area of 21% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in pre-flag leaf area of 28% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in roots numbers of 20% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in weight of 62% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed wheat maturation period by 9% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed wheat yield by 58% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed development of root rot by 18% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed septoria by 18% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed yellow rust pustules area by 44% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed productive bushiness by 25% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed plant height by 19% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed plant vegetative weight by 21% relative to control.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed wheat yield by 67% relative to control.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11e0
Interactor: Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome: wheat yielde0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 67%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80

e0
“The maximum increase in wheat yield (by 67% to the control), associated with a decrease in the root rot development by 19%, an increase in the productive bushiness by 18%, the spike weight by 26%, in the grains number per spike by 8% was noted when using the Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–290

Title

Identification of the effectiveness of associative rhizobacteria in spring wheat cultivation

Kolesnikov, L.E.; Belimov, A.A.; Kudryavtseva, E.Y.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2021. doi:10.15159/ar.21.145

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed root rot development by 19% relative to control.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed productive bushiness by 18% relative to control.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed spike weight by 26% relative to control.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed grains number per spike by 8% relative to control.
Intervention effect The strain had an insignificant effect on leaf diseases of 2–5%.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in total bushiness of 59% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in plants vegetative part weight of 27% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in flag leaf area of 21% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in pre-flag leaf area of 28% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in roots numbers of 20% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in weight of 62% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed wheat maturation period by 9% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed wheat yield by 58% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed development of root rot by 18% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed septoria by 18% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed yellow rust pustules area by 44% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed productive bushiness by 25% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed plant height by 19% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed plant vegetative weight by 21% relative to control.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed septoria by 18% relative to control.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137e3
Interactor: Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137Pseudomonas fluorescense3symbiont
Outcome: septoriae3
Direction: decreasee3
Value: 18%e3
Comparator: controle3

Verbatim

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80

e3
“After plants treatments with the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137, the wheat maturation period was reduced by 9% (to the control), wheat yield increased by 58% due to a decrease in the development of root rot and septoria by 18%, the yellow rust pustules area by 44%; the productive bushiness and plant height increased by 25% and 19%, the plant vegetative weight by 21%, the spike length by 4%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–985

Title

Identification of the effectiveness of associative rhizobacteria in spring wheat cultivation

Kolesnikov, L.E.; Belimov, A.A.; Kudryavtseva, E.Y.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2021. doi:10.15159/ar.21.145

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed wheat yield by 67% relative to control.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed root rot development by 19% relative to control.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed productive bushiness by 18% relative to control.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed spike weight by 26% relative to control.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis strain 124-11 changed grains number per spike by 8% relative to control.
Intervention effect The strain had an insignificant effect on leaf diseases of 2–5%.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in total bushiness of 59% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in plants vegetative part weight of 27% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in flag leaf area of 21% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in pre-flag leaf area of 28% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in roots numbers of 20% relative to control.
Observation The plants showed a maximum change in weight of 62% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed wheat maturation period by 9% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed wheat yield by 58% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed development of root rot by 18% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed yellow rust pustules area by 44% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed productive bushiness by 25% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed plant height by 19% relative to control.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SPB2137 changed plant vegetative weight by 21% relative to control.

Screening of mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties under different quality of saline water irrigation in semi-arid conditions of Haryana 13

Show all 13 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

seed yield declined as irrigation water salinity rose.

Taxon: mustarde1
Treatment: increasing salinity of irrigation watere0
Outcome: seed yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The data on seed yield, straw yield and other physiological parameters indicated decrease with increasing salinity of irrigation water.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–628

e1
“mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–48

Title

Screening of mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties under different quality of saline water irrigation in semi-arid conditions of Haryana

R. Prakash; S. Devi; N. Kumar; et al. Journal of Environmental Biology 2023. doi:10.22438/jeb/44/3/si-151

Other claims from this paper (15)

Association straw yield declined as irrigation water salinity rose.
Association other physiological parameters declined as irrigation water salinity rose.
Observation Variety by saline water interaction was reported as insignificant.
Observation CS 2005-143 had significantly higher seed yield than other varieties.
Observation CS 2005-143 had significantly higher straw yield than other varieties.
Observation Kranti (NC) had the lowest seed yield.
Observation Kranti (NC) had the lowest straw yield.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 3.69 at irrigation salinity 2.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 12.42 at irrigation salinity 5.0 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 24.89 at irrigation salinity 7.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 4.16 at irrigation salinity 2.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 14.85 at irrigation salinity 5.0 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 27.54% at irrigation salinity 7.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect Chlorophyll content, stability, relative water content and assimilation rate declined under salinity.
Observation Reductions were greatest at 7.5 dS m-1 salinity.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

straw yield declined as irrigation water salinity rose.

Taxon: mustarde1
Treatment: increasing salinity of irrigation watere0
Outcome: straw yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The data on seed yield, straw yield and other physiological parameters indicated decrease with increasing salinity of irrigation water.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–628

e1
“mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–48

Title

Screening of mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties under different quality of saline water irrigation in semi-arid conditions of Haryana

R. Prakash; S. Devi; N. Kumar; et al. Journal of Environmental Biology 2023. doi:10.22438/jeb/44/3/si-151

Other claims from this paper (15)

Association seed yield declined as irrigation water salinity rose.
Association other physiological parameters declined as irrigation water salinity rose.
Observation Variety by saline water interaction was reported as insignificant.
Observation CS 2005-143 had significantly higher seed yield than other varieties.
Observation CS 2005-143 had significantly higher straw yield than other varieties.
Observation Kranti (NC) had the lowest seed yield.
Observation Kranti (NC) had the lowest straw yield.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 3.69 at irrigation salinity 2.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 12.42 at irrigation salinity 5.0 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 24.89 at irrigation salinity 7.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 4.16 at irrigation salinity 2.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 14.85 at irrigation salinity 5.0 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 27.54% at irrigation salinity 7.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect Chlorophyll content, stability, relative water content and assimilation rate declined under salinity.
Observation Reductions were greatest at 7.5 dS m-1 salinity.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

other physiological parameters declined as irrigation water salinity rose.

Taxon: mustarde1
Treatment: increasing salinity of irrigation watere0
Outcome: other physiological parameterse0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The data on seed yield, straw yield and other physiological parameters indicated decrease with increasing salinity of irrigation water.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–628

e1
“mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–48

Title

Screening of mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties under different quality of saline water irrigation in semi-arid conditions of Haryana

R. Prakash; S. Devi; N. Kumar; et al. Journal of Environmental Biology 2023. doi:10.22438/jeb/44/3/si-151

Other claims from this paper (15)

Association seed yield declined as irrigation water salinity rose.
Association straw yield declined as irrigation water salinity rose.
Observation Variety by saline water interaction was reported as insignificant.
Observation CS 2005-143 had significantly higher seed yield than other varieties.
Observation CS 2005-143 had significantly higher straw yield than other varieties.
Observation Kranti (NC) had the lowest seed yield.
Observation Kranti (NC) had the lowest straw yield.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 3.69 at irrigation salinity 2.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 12.42 at irrigation salinity 5.0 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 24.89 at irrigation salinity 7.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 4.16 at irrigation salinity 2.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 14.85 at irrigation salinity 5.0 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 27.54% at irrigation salinity 7.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect Chlorophyll content, stability, relative water content and assimilation rate declined under salinity.
Observation Reductions were greatest at 7.5 dS m-1 salinity.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS 14

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14

The reasons for the decrease in the feld crops yield against the background of ﬂat-cut basic tillage 14

Super‐optimal temperatures are detrimental to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) reproductive processes and yield at both ambient and elevated carbon dioxide 13

Liming can decrease legume crop yield and leaf gas exchange by enhancing root to shoot ABA signalling 13

Estimation of the Rate of Yield Decrease and Characteristics of Damage in Rice Plant Exposed to Salty Winds of Typhoon No. 15, 2004 13

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties 13

Identification of the effectiveness of associative rhizobacteria in spring wheat cultivation 13

Screening of mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties under different quality of saline water irrigation in semi-arid conditions of Haryana 13