Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gladius had the lowest stress-induced yield decrease.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: Gladiuse1
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: lowest decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“it was the genotype with the lowest decrease in yield because of stress.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1378

t0
“spring wheat subjected to heat and combined heat and drought stresses”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–146

e1
“A small leaf area prolonged the drying period of Gladius”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1300

Title

Leaf photosynthetic performance is not a key factor affecting grain yield in spring wheat subjected to heat and combined heat and drought stresses

Søren Gjedde Sommer; Xiangnan Li; Eva Rosenqvist; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2024. doi:10.1111/jac.12685

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observation LM62 had a higher photosynthetic rate than LM19.
Observation Grain yield did not differ significantly between LM62 and LM19.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 increased photosynthesis at 35°C.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly lowered electron transport at high intercellular CO2.
Intervention effect V cmax increased at 35°C relative to 25°C.
Intervention effect J max increased at 35°C relative to 25°C.
Intervention effect Temperature-normalized V cmax declined in heat-stressed plants.
Intervention effect Temperature-normalized J max declined in heat-stressed plants.
Intervention effect F v / F m decreased under heat.
Association Heat-related F v / F m decline correlated with yield loss.
Intervention effect F v / F m declined under combined heat and drought.
Association The F v / F m decline under combined stress did not relate to yield decline.
Association Small leaf area prolonged drying in Gladius.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed system moderated, to some extent, the decrease in yield of bread wheat caused by drought stress.

Taxon: bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: raised bed systeme5
Outcome: decrease in yield due to drought stresse5
Direction: moderatede5
Qualifier: to some extente5

Verbatim

t0
“bread wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42

e5
“The decrease in yield due to drought stress was moderated to some extent in the raised bed system”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1082

Title

Agrophysiological responses of bread wheat to raised-bed planting and irrigation level

Farahnaz Momtazi; Hamidreza Miri; Barmak Jafari Haghighi; et al. Water Science & Technology Water Supply 2024. doi:10.2166/ws.2024.228

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased grain yield of bread wheat by 24% compared with flat cultivation.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased biological yield of bread wheat by about 17%.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased the number of ears of bread wheat by 7%.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased the number of seeds per ear of bread wheat by 21%.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased grain yield of bread wheat by 46.4% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased the number of ears of bread wheat by 20.5% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased seed number of bread wheat by 30.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased biological yield of bread wheat by 45.9% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased chlorophyll a of bread wheat by 31.8% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased chlorophyll b of bread wheat by 28.1% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased relative water content of bread wheat by 5.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress increased proline content of bread wheat by 24.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress increased ion leakage of bread wheat by 147.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased water use efficiency of bread wheat.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation increased water use efficiency of bread wheat.
Recommendation Cultivation on raised beds is suggested as a suitable planting pattern to improve yield and WUE in wheat under water shortage.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude direct-seeded zero tillage may decrease rice grain yield relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: direct-seeded ZT systeme0
Outcome: rice grain yield might decrease under a direct-seeded ZT systeme0
Comparator: conventional systeme0

Verbatim

e0
“rice grain yield might decrease under a direct-seeded ZT system more than the conventional system”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1777

Title

Response of Rice to Tillage, Wheat Residue and Weed Management in a Rice-Wheat Cropping System

Bisheshwor P. Pandey; Tanka P. Kandel Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10111734

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Conventional tillage yielded 4.8 t ha−1 of rice grain, significantly more than zero tillage at 4.4 t ha−1.
Intervention effect Increasing wheat residue retention consistently increased rice grain yield in all three years.
Intervention effect Weed management system did not influence rice grain yield.
Recommendation The authors conclude retaining wheat residue can significantly increase rice grain yield.
Recommendation The authors conclude bispyribac-sodium may be as effective as manual weeding for weed control in both rice planting systems.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DT6 cotton yield did not decrease significantly versus DT2.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment: DT6e1
Outcome: cotton yielde0
Direction: no significant decreasee0
Comparator: DT2e0

Verbatim

e0
“no significant decrease in biomass and cotton yield was observed compared to the DT2 sample.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1302

e1
“The DT6 plants (60% Urea + DCD + NBPT + cotton straw)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1164

Title

Effects of Nitrogen Conservation Measures on the Nitrogen Uptake by Cotton Plants and Nitrogen Residual in Soil Profile in Extremely Arid Areas of Xinjiang, China

Jinhu Zhi; Taoyu Qiu; Xinlu Bai; et al. Processes 2022. doi:10.3390/pr10020353

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Cotton straw treatment DT5 benefited vegetative seedling growth.
Observation Later DT5 plant height, biomass and yield were poor.
Intervention effect DT6 increased cotton plant height by 15 cm versus DT1.
Intervention effect DT6 had higher fourth leaf SPAD than DT1 and DT4.
Intervention effect DT6 increased nitrogen use efficiency by up to 47%.
Intervention effect DT6 biomass did not decrease significantly versus DT2.
Observation Tillage layer soil nitrate residue rose between drip irrigations.
Intervention effect Other treatments had lower residual soil nitrate than DT2.
Recommendation Reduced fertilizer with conservation measures may improve N efficiency, limit pollution and maintain cotton yield.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

US maize yield was projected to decrease 13.5% under 2 °C warming.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Outcome: maize yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 13.5%e0
Qualifier: 2 °C global warming scenario (by ∼2050 s)e0

Verbatim

e0
“US maize yield is projected to decrease by 13.5% under the 2 °C global warming scenario (by ∼2050 s)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1251

Title

Predicting spatial and temporal variability in crop yields: an inter-comparison of machine learning, regression and process-based models

Guoyong Leng; Jim W Hall Environmental Research Letters 2020. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab7b24

Other claims from this paper (9)

Method / resource Regression and machine learning reproduced observed yield-average patterns.
Method / resource Process-based crop models had large bias in yield averages despite harmonized parameters.
Method / resource Machine learning had the best skill for yield distributions, followed by regression and process-based models.
Method / resource Machine learning explained 93% of observed yield variability.
Method / resource Regression explained 51% of observed yield variability.
Method / resource Process-based models explained 42% of observed yield variability.
Observation Baseline low-yield years were projected in 19% of years at 1.5 °C warming.
Observation Baseline low-yield years were projected in 25% of years at 2 °C warming.
Method / resource Machine learning and regression were computationally more efficient than process-based models.

Mechanismhypothesiscited backgroundbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A decrease in diurnal variation could impact rice plant respiration and yield potential, based on existing literature.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Outcome: yield potentiale4
Qualifier: decrease in diurnal variatione4

Verbatim

e4
“rising minimum temperatures suggest a potential decrease in diurnal variation, which could—based on existing literature—impact rice plant respiration and yield potential”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1132

e0
“Paddy cultivation, a vital source of rice for billions globally”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63

Title

Impact of Climate Fluctuations on Paddy Yield: A Case Study in Kollengode Village, India

K.R. Sreeni; Nirmala Vasudevan E3S Web of Conferences 2024. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202455901015

Other claims from this paper (5)

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A decrease in daily maximum and minimum temperatures of the region increased rice yield.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment: decrease in daily maximum and minimum temperaturese3
Outcome: yielde3
Direction: increasede3

Verbatim

t0
“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–167

e3
“The decrease in daily maximum and minimum temperatures of the region has increased the yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1558

Title

Yield Prediction, Sensitivity Analysis and Calibration of DSSAT Crop Model for Different Cultivars, Establishment Methods and Nitrogen Levels in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Under Normal and Varied Temperatures

Masina Sairam International Journal of Bioresource Science 2023. doi:10.30954/2347-9655.02.2023.1

Other claims from this paper (5)

Associationobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Citrus rust mite causes a decrease in fruit yield, fruit quality and fruit economic value.

Taxon: CitrusCitrust0
Interactor: Phyllocoptruta oleivoraPhyllocoptruta oleivorae2pest
Outcome: fruit yield, fruit quality and fruit economic valuee1
Direction: decreasee1

Verbatim

t0
“in Citrus Production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–108

e1
“CRM causes a decrease in fruit yield, fruit quality and fruit economic value in citrus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2186–2272

e2
“The pest Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead) or citrus rust mite (CRM)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–502

Title

Effects of Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead) on Fruit Yield, Quality and Economic Value in Citrus Production

Hülya Sayğı Black Sea Journal of Agriculture 2024. doi:10.47115/bsagriculture.1551557

Other claims from this paper (12)

Association Citrus rust mite reduces tree productivity by 30%.
Association Citrus rust mite reduces fruit productivity by 2.6-65%.
Association Citrus rust mite reduces fruit volume (weight, length, and diameter) by 12.5-25%.
Association Citrus rust mite increases fruit rind thickness by 13.95-23.81.
Association Citrus rust mite reduces fruit juice by 22.68-32.69%.
Association Citrus rust mite reduces Brix/Acid value by 9.22-27.56.
Association Citrus rust mite increases Brix value by 4.23-16.36.
Association Citrus rust mite increases acid value by 14.66-80.82.
Association Citrus rust mite reduces the market value of citrus fruit.
Association Citrus rust mite impairs the quality of 87% of total marketable fruit.
Observation Pest control against citrus rust mite costs $ 47 per acre.
Recommendation Preventing this pest will increase the economic benefit from agricultural production.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root system mass and biomass share had the greatest association with yield decrease, mainly under drought.

Taxon: potato plantsSolanum tuberosumt0
Organ / stage: root systeme0
Outcome: decrease in yielde0
Qualifier: drought stresse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“the mass of the root system and its share in the entire biomass of the plant had the greatest impact on the decrease in yield. This mainly concerned drought stress.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1310

t0
“potato plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–40

Title

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Plant Shoot and Root Changes under Abiotic Stresses—Yield Response

Dominika Boguszewska- Mańkowska; Krystyna Zarzyńska; Beata Wasilewska-Nascimento Plants 2022. doi:10.3390/plants11243568

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Drought stress changed potato morphology.
Intervention effect Combined drought and heat produced the largest morphological changes.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased potato tuber yield.
Intervention effect Combined drought and heat gave the largest tuber yield decrease.
Intervention effect Heat stress caused the smallest yield decrease relative to control.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing 2,4-D dose before tillering caused a linear decrease in wheat grain yield.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: increase of the 2,4-D doses applied before tilleringe0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: linear decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The increase of the 2,4-D doses applied before tillering and in the booting stage caused linear decrease in wheat grain yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1518

Title

Does doses and time of 2,4-D application interfere in the physiology and wheat grains yield components?

Vinícius Soligo; Leandro Galon; César Tiago Forte; et al. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 2022. doi:10.1590/1808-1657000342020

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect 2,4-D caused wheat phytotoxicity, which was greater at increasing doses and before tillering.
Intervention effect 2,4-D caused grain sterility in wheat.
Intervention effect 2,4-D decreased wheat productivity.
Intervention effect Other wheat yield components did not differ by dose and application stage.
Intervention effect Wheat physiological variables did not differ by dose and application stage.
Intervention effect Increasing 2,4-D dose at booting caused a linear decrease in wheat grain yield.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics