Paper · 2005 · http://www.ag.auburn.edu/auxiliary/nsdl/scasc/Proceedings/2005/Saini.pdf

Winter weed suppression by winter cover crops in a conservation-tillage corn and cotton rotation.

Monika Saini; Andrew J. Price; Edzard van Santen; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An integral component of a conservation-tillage system in corn (Zea mays L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is the use of a winter cover crop. A field experiment was initiated in 2002 to evaluate winter weed dynamics following various winter cover crops in both continuous cotton and a corn and cotton rotation. Winter cover crops included black oats (Avena strigosa Schreb.); two crimson clover entries (Trifolium incarnatum L.); two cultivars of forage rape (Brassica napus L. var. napus), spring and winter; oil radish (Raphanus sativus var. oleiformis Pers.); three cultivars of turnip (Brassica rapa L. subsp. rapa); white lupin (Lupinus albus L.); and a mixture of black oat and lupin. Two-year conservation-tillage rotational sequences included conventionally tilled continuous corn and cotton winter fallow systems as controls. The 10 conservation-tillage, winter cover-crop systems investigated were three continuous cotton systems that alternated a winter legume (lupin or clover), six cotton-corn systems, where lupin preceded cotton and radish, rape, or turnip preceded corn, and a cotton-corn system that had a lupin-black oat mixture as a winter cover crop every year. Use of lupin or ‘AU Robin ’ clover resulted in weed biomass reduction of up to 80 % and 54%, respectively, in weed biomass compared to the fallow system. The highest yielding corn-cotton conservation tillage rotation with a winter cover yielded 200 lbs/acre more that the continuous cotton winter fallow system. Continuous conventional corn with winter fallow yielded 30 bu/acre less than the highest yielding 2-yr, conservation tillage winter crop system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter lupin as a cover crop reduced winter weed biomass by up to 80 % compared with the fallow system.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumZea mayse0
Treatment
lupine1
Interactor
winter weede3weed
Outcome
weed biomasse1
Direction
reductione1
Value
up to 80 %e1
Comparator
fallow systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn (Zea mays L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Use of lupin or ‘AU Robin ’ clover resulted in weed biomass reduction of up to 80 % and 54%, respectively, in weed biomass compared to the fallow system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“evaluate winter weed dynamics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover as a winter cover crop reduced winter weed biomass by 54% compared with the fallow system.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumZea mayse0
Treatment
clovere1
Interactor
winter weede3weed
Outcome
weed biomasse1
Direction
reductione1
Value
54%e1
Comparator
fallow systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn (Zea mays L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Use of lupin or ‘AU Robin ’ clover resulted in weed biomass reduction of up to 80 % and 54%, respectively, in weed biomass compared to the fallow system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“evaluate winter weed dynamics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yielding corn-cotton rotation with a winter cover yielded 200 lbs/acre more than continuous cotton with winter fallow.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumZea mayse0
Treatment
corn-cotton conservation tillage rotation with a winter covere2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
moree2
Value
200 lbs/acree2
Comparator
continuous cotton winter fallow systeme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn (Zea mays L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–111 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yielding corn-cotton conservation tillage rotation with a winter cover yielded 200 lbs/acre more that the continuous cotton winter fallow system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous conventional corn with winter fallow yielded 30 bu/acre less than the highest yielding two-year conservation-tillage winter cover system.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumZea mayse0
Treatment
Continuous conventional corn with winter fallowe4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
lesse4
Value
30 bu/acree4
Comparator
the highest yielding 2-yr, conservation tillage winter crop systeme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn (Zea mays L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–111 · show in text ↑
e4

“Continuous conventional corn with winter fallow yielded 30 bu/acre less than the highest yielding 2-yr, conservation tillage winter crop system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1642 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

rotation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 26 positive, 17 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

tillage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

159 papers: 113 positive, 46 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

155 papers more in this group

See all 159 papers →

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.