Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Effect of different plant spacings and fertigation levels on yield of chilli

Jadhav GB; YB Dharmik; Janorkar HP

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment entitled ‘‘Effect of different plant spacings and fertigation levels on yield of chilli’’ was carried at RFRS, Katol, District Nagpur in 2024-2025. Variety Keshori is studied under this experiment. The experiment was laid out in Factorial Randomized Block Design with twelve treatment combinations replicated thrice. The treatments comprised of four levels of plant spacing viz., S1-60 cm × 60 cm, S2-60 cm × 45 cm, S3-60 cm × 30 cm and S4-45 cm × 45 cm and three levels of fertigation viz., F1-Application of RDF with traditional method, F2-Application of 100% RDF through drip and F3-Application of 80% RDF through drip. Result of an experiment revealed that, maximum yield per plot and yield per hectare was recorded under the spacing S3, while maximum number of fruits per plant, weight of fruit, average weight of 50 fruits and yield per plant were recorded under the spacing S1. All the yield parameters were recorded maximum under fertigation level F2. The interaction effect of plant spacing and fertigation on yield per plot and yield per hectare was recorded maximum under treatment combination S3F2. Maximum number of fruits per plant, weight of fruit, average weight of fruit 50 fruits and yield per plant was recorded under treatment combination S1F2. Maximum B:C ratio recorded in the treatment combination of S3F3.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing S3 produced the maximum yield per plot and hectare.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
spacing S3e0
Outcome
yield per plot and yield per hectaree0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“maximum yield per plot and yield per hectare was recorded under the spacing S3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing S1 produced the maximum fruits per plant, fruit weight, average weight of 50 fruits, and yield per plant.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
spacing S1e0
Outcome
number of fruits per plant, weight of fruit, average weight of 50 fruits and yield per plante0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“maximum number of fruits per plant, weight of fruit, average weight of 50 fruits and yield per plant were recorded under the spacing S1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation level F2 maximized all yield parameters.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
fertigation level F2e0
Outcome
yield parameterse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All the yield parameters were recorded maximum under fertigation level F2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3F2 maximized yield per plot and yield per hectare.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
treatment combination S3F2e0
Outcome
yield per plot and yield per hectaree0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effect of plant spacing and fertigation on yield per plot and yield per hectare was recorded maximum under treatment combination S3F2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S1F2 maximized fruits per plant, fruit weight, average weight of 50 fruits and yield per plant.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
treatment combination S1F2e0
Outcome
number of fruits per plant, weight of fruit, average weight of fruit 50 fruits and yield per plante0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of fruits per plant, weight of fruit, average weight of fruit 50 fruits and yield per plant was recorded under treatment combination S1F2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3F3 produced the maximum benefit-cost ratio.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
treatment combination of S3F3e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum B:C ratio recorded in the treatment combination of S3F3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

163 papers: 152 positive, 11 negative or no effect

151 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

159 papers more in this group

See all 163 papers →

density · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.