Paper · 2005 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Evaluation of chilli genotypes for salt tolerance

P. Lalitha Kameswari; Manohar D. Prasad

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A pot culture experiment was conducted during 1996–97 at Bapatla to evaluate the performance of six chilli genotypes viz., LCA 235, LCA 315, LCA 324, LCA 334, CA 960 and 64 at different levels of saline water viz., 0.66 (control), 2,4, 6, and 8 dSnr-1. The plant growth characters like plant height, leaf area and dry matter production per plant were significantly reduced by 46.3, 33.7 and 58.7 % respectively with increasing levels of salinity in irrigation water. Such declining trend was also observed in fruit characters like pod weight, pod volume and number of pods per plant. Among six varieties, LCA 235 was found to be more salt tolerant followed by 64, while LCA 334 was found to be sensitive under saline conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation salinity significantly reduced plant height by 46.3%.

Taxon
chilli genotypest0
Treatment
increasing levels of salinity in irrigation watere0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
46.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The plant growth characters like plant height, leaf area and dry matter production per plant were significantly reduced by 46.3, 33.7 and 58.7 % respectively with increasing levels of salinity in irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation salinity significantly reduced leaf area by 33.7%.

Taxon
chilli genotypest0
Treatment
increasing levels of salinity in irrigation watere0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
33.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The plant growth characters like plant height, leaf area and dry matter production per plant were significantly reduced by 46.3, 33.7 and 58.7 % respectively with increasing levels of salinity in irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation salinity significantly reduced dry matter production by 58.7%.

Taxon
chilli genotypest0
Treatment
increasing levels of salinity in irrigation watere0
Outcome
dry matter production per plante0
Direction
reducede0
Value
58.7 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The plant growth characters like plant height, leaf area and dry matter production per plant were significantly reduced by 46.3, 33.7 and 58.7 % respectively with increasing levels of salinity in irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod weight, pod volume and pod number also declined with salinity.

Taxon
chilli genotypest0
Treatment
increasing levels of salinity in irrigation watere1
Outcome
pod weight, pod volume and number of pods per plante0
Direction
declininge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Such declining trend was also observed in fruit characters like pod weight, pod volume and number of pods per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing levels of salinity in irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCA 235 was the most salt tolerant genotype.

Taxon
chilli genotypest0
Material
LCA 235e0
Outcome
salt tolerante0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
64e0

Verbatim

e0

“LCA 235 was found to be more salt tolerant followed by 64, while LCA 334 was found to be sensitive under saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype 64 ranked after LCA 235 for salt tolerance.

Taxon
chilli genotypest0
Material
64e0
Outcome
salt tolerante0
Comparator
LCA 235e0

Verbatim

e0

“LCA 235 was found to be more salt tolerant followed by 64, while LCA 334 was found to be sensitive under saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCA 334 was salt sensitive under saline conditions.

Taxon
chilli genotypest0
Material
LCA 334e0
Outcome
sensitive under saline conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“LCA 334 was found to be sensitive under saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 1 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

irrigation · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

irrigation · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 51 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

salinity · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.