Paper · 2004 · International Journal of Industrial Entomology

Damping-off Disease in Mulberry Seedlings and Its Management

V.Nishitha Naik; Dinesh Sharma; N. B. Chowdary; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

During the routine survey, the mortality of mulberry seedlings was noticed due to damping-off disease. The disease recognized by rotting of emerged seedlings near the soil line (just below the soil level) resulting in collapse of the seedlings. Two fungi were isolated from affected samples and identified as Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler and Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. Both the fungi were found to be responsible in causing pre and post emergence damping-off of seedlings in mulberry. For management of the disease, an experiment was conducted using fungicides. These fungicides were applied as seed treatment; soil drenching and foliar spray alone and in combination. Among the different treatments, integration of seed treatment and soil application of Dithane M-45 (Mancozeb 75% WP) + Bavistin (Carbendazim 50% WP) followed by foliar spray of these fungicides (after 35 days of sowing) resulted in better survivability of seedlings (93.3 %) on day and controlled the pre and post emergence damping off by 100 and 89.5%, respectively over the check.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria alternata and Fusarium solani were isolated from affected mulberry seedling samples and identified.

Taxon
mulberrye1
Organ / stage
seedlingse1
Interactor
Alternaria alternataAlternaria alternatae2pathogen
Second interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie2pathogen
Outcome
isolated from affected samplese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · Second interactorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the mortality of mulberry seedlings was noticed due to damping-off disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two fungi were isolated from affected samples and identified as Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler and Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–377 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fungi were found to cause pre and post emergence damping-off of mulberry seedlings.

Taxon
mulberrye3
Interactor
Alternaria alternataAlternaria alternatae2pathogen
Second interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie2pathogen
Outcome
pre and post emergence damping-off of seedlingse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · Second interactorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Two fungi were isolated from affected samples and identified as Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler and Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–377 · show in text ↑
e3

“Both the fungi were found to be responsible in causing pre and post emergence damping-off of seedlings in mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated seed treatment, soil application and foliar spray of Dithane M-45 and Bavistin gave better seedling survivability (93.3 %) than the check.

Taxon
mulberrye1
Treatment
integration of seed treatment and soil application of Dithane M-45 (Mancozeb 75% WP) + Bavistin (Carbendazim 50% WP) followed by foliar spraye4
Outcome
survivability of seedlingse4
Direction
bettere4
Value
93.3 %e4
Comparator
the checke5

Verbatim

e1

“the mortality of mulberry seedlings was noticed due to damping-off disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“integration of seed treatment and soil application of Dithane M-45 (Mancozeb 75% WP) + Bavistin (Carbendazim 50% WP) followed by foliar spray of these fungicides (after 35 days of sowing) resulted in better survivability of seedlings (93.3 %) on day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–960 · show in text ↑
e5

“controlled the pre and post emergence damping off by 100 and 89.5%, respectively over the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same fungicide integration controlled pre-emergence damping-off in mulberry by 100 % relative to the check.

Taxon
mulberrye1
Treatment
integration of seed treatment and soil application of Dithane M-45 (Mancozeb 75% WP) + Bavistin (Carbendazim 50% WP) followed by foliar spraye4
Outcome
damping offe5
Direction
controllede5
Value
100e5
Qualifier
respectivelye5
Comparator
the checke5

Verbatim

e1

“the mortality of mulberry seedlings was noticed due to damping-off disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“integration of seed treatment and soil application of Dithane M-45 (Mancozeb 75% WP) + Bavistin (Carbendazim 50% WP) followed by foliar spray of these fungicides (after 35 days of sowing) resulted in better survivability of seedlings (93.3 %) on day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–960 · show in text ↑
e5

“controlled the pre and post emergence damping off by 100 and 89.5%, respectively over the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same fungicide integration controlled post-emergence damping-off in mulberry by 89.5 % relative to the check.

Taxon
mulberrye1
Treatment
integration of seed treatment and soil application of Dithane M-45 (Mancozeb 75% WP) + Bavistin (Carbendazim 50% WP) followed by foliar spraye4
Outcome
damping offe5
Direction
controllede5
Value
89.5%e5
Qualifier
respectivelye5
Comparator
the checke5

Verbatim

e1

“the mortality of mulberry seedlings was noticed due to damping-off disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“integration of seed treatment and soil application of Dithane M-45 (Mancozeb 75% WP) + Bavistin (Carbendazim 50% WP) followed by foliar spray of these fungicides (after 35 days of sowing) resulted in better survivability of seedlings (93.3 %) on day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–960 · show in text ↑
e5

“controlled the pre and post emergence damping off by 100 and 89.5%, respectively over the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1060 · show in text ↑

application · disease · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.