Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Entomology

Efficacy Of Botanicals Against Mulberry Whitefly Dialeuropora Decempunctata (Quaintance and Baker) And Their Safety To Natural Enemies

Ayan Das; Hirak Chatterjee

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the evaluation of efficacy of seven biopesticides, two foliar sprays done at fifteen days interval were effective in reducing whitefly Dialeuropora decempunctata (Quintance and Baker) incidence in mulberry. Neem oil (3%) was the most effective (71.10% reduction over control) followed by pongamia oil (3%) and Torpedo (plant extract of Sophora and Stemona sp.-1ml/l) by 65.14% and 59.61%, respectively. Tobacco decoction (5%), ginger rhizome extract (15%) and chilli-garlic extract were the least effective. All the evaluated botanicals were safe to natural enemies observed on mulberry. Chilli-garlic extract and ginger rhizome extract were the safest against coccinellids and spiders, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two foliar sprays reduced mulberry whitefly incidence.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
two foliar sprays done at fifteen days intervale0
Interactor
Dialeuropora decempunctatae0pest
Outcome
whitefly Dialeuropora decempunctata (Quintance and Baker) incidencee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“two foliar sprays done at fifteen days interval were effective in reducing whitefly Dialeuropora decempunctata (Quintance and Baker) incidence in mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil reduced whitefly incidence 71.10% over control.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
Neem oil (3%)e0
Interactor
Dialeuropora Decempunctatat0pest
Outcome
whiteflyt0
Direction
reductione0
Value
71.10%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Neem oil (3%) was the most effective (71.10% reduction over control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Whitefly Dialeuropora Decempunctata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pongamia oil reduced whitefly incidence 65.14%.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
pongamia oil (3%)e0
Interactor
Dialeuropora Decempunctatat0pest
Outcome
Whiteflyt0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
65.14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“followed by pongamia oil (3%) and Torpedo (plant extract of Sophora and Stemona sp.-1ml/l) by 65.14% and 59.61%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Whitefly Dialeuropora Decempunctata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Torpedo reduced whitefly incidence 59.61%.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
Torpedo (plant extract of Sophora and Stemona sp.-1ml/l)e0
Interactor
Dialeuropora Decempunctatat0pest
Outcome
Whiteflyt0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
59.61%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“followed by pongamia oil (3%) and Torpedo (plant extract of Sophora and Stemona sp.-1ml/l) by 65.14% and 59.61%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Whitefly Dialeuropora Decempunctata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco, ginger and chilli-garlic extracts were least effective against whitefly.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Interactor
Whiteflyt0pest
Outcome
least effectivee0
Direction
least effectivee0

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco decoction (5%), ginger rhizome extract (15%) and chilli-garlic extract were the least effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Whitefly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested botanicals were safe for natural enemies observed on mulberry.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Interactor
natural enemiese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
safe to natural enemiese0

Verbatim

e0

“All the evaluated botanicals were safe to natural enemies observed on mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli-garlic extract was safest for coccinellids.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
Chilli-garlic extracte0
Interactor
coccinellidse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
safest against coccinellidse0
Direction
safeste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chilli-garlic extract and ginger rhizome extract were the safest against coccinellids and spiders, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ginger rhizome extract was safest for spiders.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
ginger rhizome extracte0
Interactor
spidersAraneaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
safest against coccinellids and spiderse0
Direction
safeste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chilli-garlic extract and ginger rhizome extract were the safest against coccinellids and spiders, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–39 · show in text ↑

application · disease · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.