Paper · 2002 · Nigerian Journal of Entomology

Control of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) on Stored Cowpea with African Curry (Ocimum gratissimum L) and African Bush Tea (Hyptis suaveolens Poit) Leaf Powders.

A.M. OPARAEKE; M.C. DIKE; I. ONU

12
claims
31
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Leaf powders of African curry, Ocimum gratisstmum L and African bush tea, Hyptis suaveolens Poit, were evaluated for their efficacy against the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F) on stored cowpea. O. gratissimum at 2.5g, 5.0g and 10.0g per 100g cowpea grains effected 46.7%,46.7% and 65. 0% adult bruchid mortality respectively within 24 hours; 73.3% , 75.0% and 80%. 0% adult bruchid mortality respectively within 48 hours post treatment. Similar application of Hyptis suaveolens powder had 1.7% , 3.3% and 8.3% adult beetle mortality respectively in 24 hours, 15.0%, 26.7% and 38.3 % mortality respectively in 48 hours. O. gratissimum significantly (P<0.01) reduced oviposition and progeny development in all treatment levels and therefore protected cowpea grains better than H. suaveolens. The seed coat colour, texture, taste and grain viability were not affected by the treatments after three months of storage with these plant powders.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. gratissimum at 2.5 g per 100 g cowpea grains raised adult bruchid mortality to 46.7% within 24 hours

Treatment
O. gratissimume1
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
adult bruchid mortalitye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
46.7%e1
Qualifier
2.5ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their efficacy against the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F) on stored cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“O. gratissimum at 2.5g, 5.0g and 10.0g per 100g cowpea grains effected 46.7%,46.7% and 65. 0% adult bruchid mortality respectively within 24 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. gratissimum at 5.0 g per 100 g cowpea grains raised adult bruchid mortality to 46.7% within 24 hours

Treatment
O. gratissimume1
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
adult bruchid mortalitye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
46.7%e1
Qualifier
5.0ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their efficacy against the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F) on stored cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“O. gratissimum at 2.5g, 5.0g and 10.0g per 100g cowpea grains effected 46.7%,46.7% and 65. 0% adult bruchid mortality respectively within 24 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. gratissimum at 10.0 g per 100 g cowpea grains raised adult bruchid mortality to 65.0% within 24 hours

Treatment
O. gratissimume1
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
adult bruchid mortalitye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
65. 0%e1
Qualifier
10.0ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their efficacy against the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F) on stored cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“O. gratissimum at 2.5g, 5.0g and 10.0g per 100g cowpea grains effected 46.7%,46.7% and 65. 0% adult bruchid mortality respectively within 24 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. gratissimum at 2.5 g per 100 g cowpea grains raised adult bruchid mortality to 73.3% within 48 hours

Treatment
O. gratissimume1
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
adult bruchid mortalitye2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
73.3%e2
Qualifier
within 48 hours post treatmente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their efficacy against the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F) on stored cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“O. gratissimum at 2.5g, 5.0g and 10.0g per 100g cowpea grains effected 46.7%,46.7% and 65. 0% adult bruchid mortality respectively within 24 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–352 · show in text ↑
e2

“73.3% , 75.0% and 80%. 0% adult bruchid mortality respectively within 48 hours post treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. gratissimum at 5.0 g per 100 g cowpea grains raised adult bruchid mortality to 75.0% within 48 hours

Treatment
O. gratissimume1
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
adult bruchid mortalitye2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
75.0%e2
Qualifier
within 48 hours post treatmente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their efficacy against the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F) on stored cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“O. gratissimum at 2.5g, 5.0g and 10.0g per 100g cowpea grains effected 46.7%,46.7% and 65. 0% adult bruchid mortality respectively within 24 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–352 · show in text ↑
e2

“73.3% , 75.0% and 80%. 0% adult bruchid mortality respectively within 48 hours post treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. gratissimum at 10.0 g per 100 g cowpea grains raised adult bruchid mortality to 80.0% within 48 hours

Treatment
O. gratissimume1
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
adult bruchid mortalitye2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
80%. 0%e2
Qualifier
within 48 hours post treatmente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their efficacy against the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F) on stored cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“O. gratissimum at 2.5g, 5.0g and 10.0g per 100g cowpea grains effected 46.7%,46.7% and 65. 0% adult bruchid mortality respectively within 24 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–352 · show in text ↑
e2

“73.3% , 75.0% and 80%. 0% adult bruchid mortality respectively within 48 hours post treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hyptis suaveolens powder gave 1.7%, 3.3% and 8.3% adult beetle mortality within 24 hours

Treatment
Hyptis suaveolens powdere3
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
adult beetle mortalitye3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Value
1.7% , 3.3% and 8.3%e3
Qualifier
respectively in 24 hourse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their efficacy against the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F) on stored cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–204 · show in text ↑
e3

“Hyptis suaveolens powder had 1.7% , 3.3% and 8.3% adult beetle mortality respectively in 24 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hyptis suaveolens powder gave 15.0%, 26.7% and 38.3% mortality within 48 hours

Treatment
Hyptis suaveolens powdere3
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
mortalitye4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
15.0%, 26.7% and 38.3 %e4
Qualifier
respectively in 48 hourse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their efficacy against the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F) on stored cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–204 · show in text ↑
e3

“Hyptis suaveolens powder had 1.7% , 3.3% and 8.3% adult beetle mortality respectively in 24 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–569 · show in text ↑
e4

“15.0%, 26.7% and 38.3 % mortality respectively in 48 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

O. gratissimum significantly reduced oviposition and progeny development of the bruchid at all treatment levels (P<0.01)

Treatment
O. gratissimume5
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
oviposition and progeny developmente5
Direction
reducede5
Qualifier
P<0.01e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their efficacy against the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F) on stored cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–204 · show in text ↑
e5

“O. gratissimum significantly (P<0.01) reduced oviposition and progeny development in all treatment levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. gratissimum protected cowpea grains better than H. suaveolens

Treatment
O. gratissimume5
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
protected cowpea grainse6
Direction
bettere6
Comparator
H. suaveolense6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their efficacy against the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F) on stored cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–204 · show in text ↑
e5

“O. gratissimum significantly (P<0.01) reduced oviposition and progeny development in all treatment levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–736 · show in text ↑
e6

“therefore protected cowpea grains better than H. suaveolens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed coat colour and texture of the stored cowpea were not affected by the leaf powder treatments after three months

Treatment
plant powderse2
Outcome
seed coat colour, texturee1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their efficacy against the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F) on stored cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“The seed coat colour, texture, taste and grain viability were not affected by the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–894 · show in text ↑
e2

“after three months of storage with these plant powders”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taste and grain viability of the stored cowpea were not affected by the leaf powder treatments after three months

Treatment
plant powderse2
Outcome
taste and grain viabilitye1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their efficacy against the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F) on stored cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“The seed coat colour, texture, taste and grain viability were not affected by the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–894 · show in text ↑
e2

“after three months of storage with these plant powders”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–949 · show in text ↑

Mesosphaerum suaveolens · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Ocimum gratissimum · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

botanical · quality: general · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · quality: postharvest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

botanical · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

163 papers: 158 positive, 5 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

159 papers more in this group

See all 163 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.