Paper · 2012 · TigerPrints (Clemson University)

EFFICACY OF PRECISION-APPLIED IN-FURROW INSECTICIDE/NEMATICIDE AND SEED TREATMENTS ON POPULATIONS OF THRIPS AND NEMATODES IN COTTON

Ginger Devinney

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Thrips and nematodes can be serious early-season pests of cotton grown on the highly variable soil types common in the southeastern United States. I examined the effects of precision-applied aldicarb (Temik¨ 15G) and seed treatments (Aeris¨ and Avicta Complete Pak¨) on population dynamics of thrips and nematodes in management zones defined by soil texture as measured by soil electrical conductivity (EC). Research plots were established in cotton fields with variable soil types at the Clemson University Edisto Research and Education Center near Blackville, SC, during May of 2010 and 2011. Research plots were arranged in a three-way factorial design, with management zone (low EC, medium EC, or high EC), at-plant seed treatment (Aeris, Avicta Complete Pak, or none), and aldicarb rate (0, 0.51, or 0.86 kg/ha of active ingredient) as factors. Soil texture was significantly correlated with soil EC, indicating that using zone definition by soil EC provided distinct areas for applying differential control tactics for thrips and nematodes. Population densities of thrips (2010) and nematodes (2010 and 2011) were highest in the coarsest soils (low EC zones). Seed treatments were not as effective in controlling and suppressing thrips and nematodes as aldicarb. The addition of aldicarb to seed treatments increased the efficacy of these products. Although aldicarb under the trade name Temik 15G is no longer available for use in US agricultural fields, results from this study may serve as a model for future formulations of aldicarb that may become available.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil texture correlated significantly with electrical conductivity in cotton fields.

Outcome
soil ECe0
Setting
Soil texturee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil texture was significantly correlated with soil EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“IN COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thrips density in 2010 was highest in coarse low EC cotton soil.

Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
Population densities of thripse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
2010e0
Setting
coarsest soils (low EC zones)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Population densities of thrips (2010) and nematodes (2010 and 2011) were highest in the coarsest soils (low EC zones).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–456 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode density in 2010 and 2011 was highest in coarse low EC cotton soil.

Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
nematodese0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
2010 and 2011e0
Setting
coarsest soils (low EC zones)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Population densities of thrips (2010) and nematodes (2010 and 2011) were highest in the coarsest soils (low EC zones).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatments controlled thrips less effectively than aldicarb.

Treatment
Seed treatmentse0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
controlling and suppressing thripse0
Direction
not as effectivee0
Comparator
aldicarbe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatments were not as effective in controlling and suppressing thrips and nematodes as aldicarb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1268 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatments controlled nematodes less effectively than aldicarb.

Treatment
Seed treatmentse0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
suppressing thrips and nematodese0
Direction
not as effectivee0
Comparator
aldicarbe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatments were not as effective in controlling and suppressing thrips and nematodes as aldicarb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1268 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding aldicarb increased seed treatment efficacy.

Treatment
addition of aldicarb to seed treatmentse0
Outcome
efficacy of these productse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
seed treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of aldicarb to seed treatments increased the efficacy of these products.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1354 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–456 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · Nematoda · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

seed treatment · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.