Abstract
Replicated tests conducted during three growing seasons (1954, 1955, 1956) at College Station, Texas, have shown that several systemic insecticides (demeton, Am. Cyanamid 12008 and 12009, Thimet and Bayer, 19639) applied as seed treatments adequately protected young cotton plants from thrips for a period of 4 to 6 weeks after the planting date. These materials varied in phytotoxicity which was manifested by reduced emergence or somewhat delayed fruiting under unfavorable conditions for plant emergence and growth. No significant reduction in yield resulted from these phytotoxic effects.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Systemic insecticidal seed treatments protected young cotton plants from thrips for 4 to 6 weeks.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- several systemic insecticides (demeton, Am. Cyanamid 12008 and 12009, Thimet and Bayer, 19639) applied as seed treatmentse0
- Outcome
- protected young cotton plants from thripse0
- Value
- 4 to 6 weekse0
ThripsNot reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“several systemic insecticides (demeton, Am. Cyanamid 12008 and 12009, Thimet and Bayer, 19639) applied as seed treatments adequately protected young cotton plants from thrips for a period of 4 to 6 weeks after the planting date”
Claim · model-written summary
The seed treatment materials varied in phytotoxicity, with reduced emergence under unfavorable conditions.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- These materialse0
- Outcome
- emergencee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- under unfavorable conditions for plant emergence and growthe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These materials varied in phytotoxicity which was manifested by reduced emergence or somewhat delayed fruiting under unfavorable conditions for plant emergence and growth”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
The seed treatment materials sometimes delayed fruiting under unfavorable conditions.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- These materialse0
- Outcome
- fruitinge0
- Direction
- delayede0
- Qualifier
- under unfavorable conditions for plant emergence and growthe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These materials varied in phytotoxicity which was manifested by reduced emergence or somewhat delayed fruiting under unfavorable conditions for plant emergence and growth”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
The phytotoxic effects produced no significant reduction in cotton yield.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- these phytotoxic effectse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- No significant reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No significant reduction in yield resulted from these phytotoxic effects”
t0“Cotton”
The same questions in other papers
phorate · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
mycorrhiza · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
seed treatment · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →insecticide · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.