Paper · 2010 · Letopis naučnih radova Poljoprivrednog fakulteta

Effect of common bean inoculation on yield parameters and microbial activity in rhizosphere

Mirjana Jarak; Simonida Đurić; Nataša Gluvić

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The plant production without mineral fertilizers and pesticides application, and the ability of microorganisms to provide the plants with all essential nutrients, anticipate that the microbial fertilizers will take up significant place in agricultural production (Tyler et al.,2008). The aim of this paper was to investigate the effect of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli and Azotobacter chroococcum inoculation, individually and in the mixture with Streptomyces sp., on the yield parameters of common bean and microbial activity in rhizosphere. Microbial analysis were done by standard CFU method and total number of bacteria, number of actinomycetes and azotobacter were determinated. Dehydrogenase activity was estimated spectrophotometricaly. In the stage of full maturation of common bean number of legume per plant and grain mass per plant were enumerated as basic yield parameters. Total number of bacteria and number of azotobacter were greater on variant with azotobacter inoculation. Dehydrogenase activity was greater on the variant with polyvalent inoculum, while the number of actinomycetes was greater on the variant with rizobium. Number of pods per plant was significantly increased where rhzobium and azotobacter were applied, but mixture of inoculants did not provide statistically significant resultates. Inoculation positively influenced the grain mass per plant. Where the rhizobium and mixture of inoculants were applied increase of grain mass was statistically significant. .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter inoculation increased total bacterial numbers.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
azotobacter inoculatione0
Interactor
azotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
Total number of bacteriae0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total number of bacteria and number of azotobacter were greater on variant with azotobacter inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter inoculation increased azotobacter numbers.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
azotobacter inoculatione0
Interactor
azotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
number of azotobactere0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of azotobacter were greater on variant with azotobacter inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The polyvalent inoculum increased dehydrogenase activity.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
polyvalent inoculume0
Outcome
Dehydrogenase activitye0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dehydrogenase activity was greater on the variant with polyvalent inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium treatment increased actinomycete numbers.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
rizobiume0
Interactor
rizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
number of actinomycetese0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of actinomycetes was greater on the variant with rizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium application significantly increased pods per plant.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
rhzobiume0
Interactor
rhzobiume0symbiont
Outcome
Number of pods per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of pods per plant was significantly increased where rhzobium and azotobacter were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter application significantly increased pods per plant.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
azotobactere0
Interactor
azotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
Number of pods per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of pods per plant was significantly increased where rhzobium and azotobacter were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculant mixture did not significantly change pods per plant.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
mixture of inoculantse0
Outcome
resultatese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixture of inoculants did not provide statistically significant resultates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation positively affected grain mass per plant.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
grain mass per plante0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation positively influenced the grain mass per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium significantly increased grain mass.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
rhizobiume0
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
grain masse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Where the rhizobium and mixture of inoculants were applied increase of grain mass was statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculant mixture significantly increased grain mass.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
mixture of inoculantse0
Outcome
grain masse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixture of inoculants were applied increase of grain mass was statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Azotobacter · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.