Paper · 2002 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

1-Methylcyclopropene treatment effects on intact and fresh-cut apple

Yueming Jiang; Daryl C. Joyce

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
78
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryMaintenance of quality in fresh-cut produce is an important issue for the rapidly expanding minimal processing sector. Treatment of ethylene generating and/or sensitive fresh-cut produce with the ethylene-binding inhibitor 1-methylcyclopropene may assist in quality maintenance over time. Intact (control) and sliced ‘Golden Delicious’ apple fruit at 20°C were treated either with 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) for 6 h at 0.1 to 10 μl l–1 or 1 μl l–1 for periods of 1 to 6 h. Fruit was then kept at either 20°C or 4°C. Exposure of intact or fresh-cut apple fruit to 1-MCP resulted in reduced respiration and ethylene production rates and delayed softening and colour changes. The degree of benefit generally increased with increasing 1-MCP treatment concentration and duration. Compared with untreated tissue, quality was better maintained at 4°C for apple slices to which 1-MCP was applied either before or after the fruit were processed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reduced respiration of intact and fresh-cut apple fruit.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of intact or fresh-cut apple fruit to 1-MCP resulted in reduced respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reduced ethylene production of intact and fresh-cut apple fruit.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
ethylene production ratese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh-cut apple fruit to 1-MCP resulted in reduced respiration and ethylene production rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP delayed softening and colour changes of apple fruit.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
softening and colour changese0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple fruit to 1-MCP resulted in reduced respiration and ethylene production rates and delayed softening and colour changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–680 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit increased with 1-MCP concentration.

Treatment
1-MCP treatment concentratione0
Outcome
degree of benefite0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The degree of benefit generally increased with increasing 1-MCP treatment concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–769 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit increased with 1-MCP treatment duration.

Treatment
duratione0
Outcome
degree of benefite0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The degree of benefit generally increased with increasing 1-MCP treatment concentration and duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4°C, 1-MCP before processing better maintained apple slice quality than untreated tissue.

Organ / stage
apple slicese0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
better maintainede0
Comparator
untreated tissuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with untreated tissue, quality was better maintained at 4°C for apple slices to which 1-MCP was applied either before or after the fruit were processed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–944 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

120 papers: 113 positive, 7 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: respiration · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.