Paper · 2013 · International Journal of Food Properties

Physicochemical Properties of Whole Fruit and Sensory Quality of Fresh-Cut Apples Pre-Treated with 1-Methylcyclopropene (1-MCP)

M. Siddiq; J. B. Harte; R. M. Beaudry; et al.

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Apple fruit quality is an important factor in minimally processed or fresh-cut slices. Ethylene action inhibitor, 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) is used commercially to extend the shelf life of selected fruits, including apples. The present study was designed to assess the selected physiochemical properties of whole fruit and sensory attributes of fresh-cut slices from three 1-MCP treated apple cultivars (Jonagold, Empire, and Mutsu) that were stored for 3 months in air or 6, 9, and 12 months in controlled atmosphere. Apples and fresh-cut slices were evaluated for selected quality characteristics at 3-month intervals. Generally, the 1-MCP treatment resulted in firmer fruit and lower pH, whereas it had no or minimal effect on fruit skin color and total soluble solids. Titratable acidity values decreased in both control and 1-MCP treated apples, the only exception being 12-month controlled atmosphere stored apples that showed an increase. At each 3-month interval, fresh-cut slices (after 10-day storage at 4°C) were evaluated by a 9-member trained panel for "difference from control" on a 0–8 scoring scale; the results of these evaluations showed relatively small "difference from control" scores for the degree of browning, texture, and flavor. At the 9-month storage, a 114-member consumer panel evaluated the appearance, texture, flavor, and overall acceptability of fresh-cut slices on a 1–9 hedonic scale. Except for Jonagold slice flavor, slices from 1-MCP treated fruit exhibited similar or higher sensory scores. The overall acceptability scores were 6.78, 7.12, and 7.18 for slices from Jonagold, Empire, and Mutsu apples, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP treatment produced firmer apple fruit.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente0
Outcome
firmer fruite0
Direction
firmere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 1-MCP treatment resulted in firmer fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP treatment lowered apple fruit pH.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 1-MCP treatment resulted in firmer fruit and lower pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP had no or minimal effect on apple fruit skin color and total soluble solids.

Treatment
1-MCPt0
Outcome
fruit skin color and total soluble solidse0
Direction
no or minimal effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it had no or minimal effect on fruit skin color and total soluble solids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples Pre-Treated with 1-Methylcyclopropene (1-MCP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acidity decreased in control and 1-MCP-treated apples, apart from the 12-month controlled-atmosphere group.

Outcome
Titratable acidity valuese0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
both control and 1-MCP treated applese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Titratable acidity values decreased in both control and 1-MCP treated apples, the only exception being 12-month controlled atmosphere stored apples that showed an increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acidity increased in apples stored 12 months in controlled atmosphere.

Outcome
Titratable aciditye0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
12-month controlled atmospheree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Titratable acidity values decreased in both control and 1-MCP treated apples, the only exception being 12-month controlled atmosphere stored apples that showed an increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–947 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh-cut apple slices had relatively small difference-from-control scores for browning, texture, and flavor after 10 days at 4°C.

Organ / stage
fresh-cut slicese0
Outcome
"difference from control" scores for the degree of browning, texture, and flavore1
Direction
relatively smalle1
Qualifier
after 10-day storage at 4°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh-cut slices (after 10-day storage at 4°C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1021 · show in text ↑
e1

“relatively small "difference from control" scores for the degree of browning, texture, and flavor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Except for Jonagold flavor, slices from 1-MCP-treated apples had similar or higher sensory scores.

Treatment
1-MCP treated fruite0
Outcome
sensory scorese0
Direction
similar or highere0
Qualifier
Except for Jonagold slice flavore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except for Jonagold slice flavor, slices from 1-MCP treated fruit exhibited similar or higher sensory scores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1531 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jonagold fresh-cut slices had an overall acceptability score of 6.78.

Material
Jonagolde0
Outcome
overall acceptability scorese0
Value
6.78e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The overall acceptability scores were 6.78, 7.12, and 7.18 for slices from Jonagold, Empire, and Mutsu apples, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Empire fresh-cut slices had an overall acceptability score of 7.12.

Material
Empiree0
Outcome
overall acceptability scorese0
Value
7.12e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The overall acceptability scores were 6.78, 7.12, and 7.18 for slices from Jonagold, Empire, and Mutsu apples, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mutsu fresh-cut slices had an overall acceptability score of 7.18.

Material
Mutsue0
Outcome
overall acceptability scorese0
Value
7.18e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The overall acceptability scores were 6.78, 7.12, and 7.18 for slices from Jonagold, Empire, and Mutsu apples, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1656 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

56 papers: 47 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.