Paper · 2011 · Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture)

Vegetable quality in a conventional and three organic cropping systems

Hanne Lakkenborg Kristensen; Ulla Kidmose; Dorte Bodin Dresbøll; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Differences in nutrient availability and methods of pest management may affect crop growth and product quality. The question is if conventional and organic cropping systems, which differ clearly in strategies for nutrient and pest management, influence the harvest and sensory quality of the products? Lettuce and onion were grown in a conventional and three organic vegetable cropping systems with different levels of external inputs and use of cover- and inter-crops for nutrient re-cycling and natural pest management in the period of 2007-2009 (VegQure project). The crop rotation consisted of 8 fields of vegetables and cereals. Onion was grown after a year of oat and iceberg lettuce after winter rye. There were 3 replicates of each cropping system each year. Sensory analysis of samples of iceberg lettuce was performed as quantitative descriptive analysis by a trained sensory panel of 10 assessors. A sensory profile of 9 attributes was evaluated on a 15-cm non-structured continuous scale. Harvest and sensory quality were not affected by the clear differences in nutrient and pest management between the four cropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest quality did not differ across the four cropping systems.

Taxon
Lettuce and onionLactuca sativaAllium cepae0
Treatment
conventional and three organic vegetable cropping systemse0
Outcome
Harveste1
Direction
not affectede1
Comparator
the four cropping systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lettuce and onion were grown in a conventional and three organic vegetable cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“Harvest and sensory quality were not affected by the clear differences in nutrient and pest management between the four cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensory quality did not differ across the four cropping systems.

Taxon
Lettuce and onionLactuca sativaAllium cepae0
Treatment
conventional and three organic vegetable cropping systemse0
Outcome
sensory qualitye1
Direction
not affectede1
Comparator
the four cropping systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lettuce and onion were grown in a conventional and three organic vegetable cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“Harvest and sensory quality were not affected by the clear differences in nutrient and pest management between the four cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1137 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: general · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cultivation system · quality: general · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 16 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.