Paper · 2022 · Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica/Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica

The influence of planting dates and field management on bulb quality and post-harvest losses of onion

Hamid Salari

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out to study the influence of planting date and field management practices on bulb quality and post-harvest losses of onions in storage at Agriculture Research Farm of Kabul University. Different traits including fresh bulb weight, total soluble solids, firmness, rooting, sprouting, spoilage and marketable bulbs were studied in these trials. The data were statistically analysed with R software. The planting dates had significant effect on fresh bulb weight, sprouting, spoilage and marketable bulbs of onions. After 120 days of storage the greatest fresh bulb weight (111.64 g), marketable bulbs (77.52 %) and the lowest sprouting (10.56 %) and spoilage (11.92 %) were recorded for the first planting date (10th May). Similarly, the lowest loss in total soluble solids was also observed under the first planting date. Field management practices did not have significant effect on bulb quality and post-harvest losses of onions. While delayed planting can significantly reduce onion bulb quality and increase sprouting and spoilage, early planting dates were more appropriate to reduce post-harvest losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting dates significantly affected fresh bulb weight, sprouting, spoilage and marketable bulbs.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
planting datese0
Outcome
fresh bulb weight, sprouting, spoilage and marketable bulbse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The planting dates had significant effect on fresh bulb weight, sprouting, spoilage and marketable bulbs of onions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first planting date gave the greatest fresh bulb weight after 120 days of storage.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
first planting date (10th May)e0
Outcome
fresh bulb weighte0
Direction
greateste0
Value
111.64 ge0
Qualifier
After 120 days of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 120 days of storage the greatest fresh bulb weight (111.64 g), marketable bulbs (77.52 %) and the lowest sprouting (10.56 %) and spoilage (11.92 %) were recorded for the first planting date (10th May).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first planting date gave the greatest share of marketable bulbs after storage.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
first planting date (10th May)e0
Outcome
marketable bulbse0
Direction
greateste0
Value
77.52 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 120 days of storage the greatest fresh bulb weight (111.64 g), marketable bulbs (77.52 %) and the lowest sprouting (10.56 %) and spoilage (11.92 %) were recorded for the first planting date (10th May).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first planting date gave the lowest sprouting after storage.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
first planting date (10th May)e0
Outcome
sproutinge0
Direction
loweste0
Value
10.56 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 120 days of storage the greatest fresh bulb weight (111.64 g), marketable bulbs (77.52 %) and the lowest sprouting (10.56 %) and spoilage (11.92 %) were recorded for the first planting date (10th May).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first planting date gave the lowest spoilage after storage.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
first planting date (10th May)e0
Outcome
spoilagee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
11.92 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 120 days of storage the greatest fresh bulb weight (111.64 g), marketable bulbs (77.52 %) and the lowest sprouting (10.56 %) and spoilage (11.92 %) were recorded for the first planting date (10th May).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first planting date had the lowest loss of total soluble solids.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
first planting datee0
Outcome
loss in total soluble solidse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest loss in total soluble solids was also observed under the first planting date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field management practices had no significant effect on onion bulb quality and postharvest losses.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
Field management practicese0
Outcome
bulb quality and post-harvest lossese0
Direction
did not have significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field management practices did not have significant effect on bulb quality and post-harvest losses of onions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–969 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favor early planting dates to reduce postharvest losses.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
early planting dates were more appropriate to reduce post-harvest lossese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early planting dates were more appropriate to reduce post-harvest losses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1147 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: general · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

sowing time · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sowing time · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

sowing time · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.