Paper · 2007 · Journal of Horticultural Sciences

Effect of Date of Harvest and Floral Preservatives on Vase Life of Cut Flowers in Tuberose (Polyanthes tuberosa L.) cv. Double

D K Varu; A V Barad

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Studies conducted to find out the effect of date of harvesting and floral preservatives on vase life and quality of tuberose cv. Double revealed that among treatments, harvesting on 1st October (D8) was better for longer vase life, whereas, 15th August (D5) for minimum loss of water, maximum fresh weight of the spike and percentage of opened florets. Similarly, harvesting on 15th September (D7) was found better for longest floret longevity as well as loss uptake ratio. In case of floral preservatives, the treatment 500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrose (C6) was found better for longer vase life, maximum uptake of water, lowest loss-uptake ratio and maximum fresh weight of spike, whereas, 400 ppm 8-HQS + 4% sucrose (C8) for maximum floret longevity and floret circumference as well as maximum percentage of opened and lowest percentage of neck bent florets. The treatment, 50 ppm silver nitrate + 4% sucrose (C3) exhibited lowest loss of water. In case of interaction effect, 1st October with 500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrose (D8C6) was found superior for maximum vase life of spike, highest uptake of water and fresh weight of spike.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting on 1 October gave longer vase life in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
harvesting on 1st October (D8)e1
Outcome
vase lifee1
Direction
bettere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“harvesting on 1st October (D8) was better for longer vase life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting on 15 August gave minimum loss of water in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
15th August (D5)e2
Outcome
loss of watere2
Direction
minimume2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“15th August (D5) for minimum loss of water, maximum fresh weight of the spike and percentage of opened florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting on 15 August gave maximum fresh weight of the spike in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
15th August (D5)e2
Outcome
fresh weight of the spikee2
Direction
maximume2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“15th August (D5) for minimum loss of water, maximum fresh weight of the spike and percentage of opened florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting on 15 August gave maximum percentage of opened florets in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
15th August (D5)e2
Outcome
percentage of opened floretse2
Direction
maximume2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“15th August (D5) for minimum loss of water, maximum fresh weight of the spike and percentage of opened florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting on 15 September gave the longest floret longevity in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
harvesting on 15th September (D7)e3
Outcome
floret longevitye3
Direction
longeste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e3

“harvesting on 15th September (D7) was found better for longest floret longevity as well as loss uptake ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting on 15 September was better for loss uptake ratio in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
harvesting on 15th September (D7)e3
Outcome
loss uptake ratioe3
Direction
bettere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e3

“harvesting on 15th September (D7) was found better for longest floret longevity as well as loss uptake ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

500 ppm aluminum sulphate with 4% sucrose gave longer vase life in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrosee4
Outcome
vase lifee4
Direction
longere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e4

“the treatment 500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrose (C6) was found better for longer vase life, maximum uptake of water, lowest loss-uptake ratio and maximum fresh weight of spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

500 ppm aluminum sulphate with 4% sucrose gave maximum uptake of water in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrosee4
Outcome
uptake of watere4
Direction
maximume4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e4

“the treatment 500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrose (C6) was found better for longer vase life, maximum uptake of water, lowest loss-uptake ratio and maximum fresh weight of spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

500 ppm aluminum sulphate with 4% sucrose gave lowest loss-uptake ratio in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrosee4
Outcome
loss-uptake ratioe4
Direction
loweste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e4

“the treatment 500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrose (C6) was found better for longer vase life, maximum uptake of water, lowest loss-uptake ratio and maximum fresh weight of spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

500 ppm aluminum sulphate with 4% sucrose gave maximum fresh weight of spike in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrosee4
Outcome
fresh weight of spikee4
Direction
maximume4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e4

“the treatment 500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrose (C6) was found better for longer vase life, maximum uptake of water, lowest loss-uptake ratio and maximum fresh weight of spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

400 ppm 8-HQS with 4% sucrose gave maximum floret longevity in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
400 ppm 8-HQS + 4% sucrosee5
Outcome
floret longevitye5
Direction
maximume5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e5

“whereas, 400 ppm 8-HQS + 4% sucrose (C8) for maximum floret longevity and floret circumference as well as maximum percentage of opened and lowest percentage of neck bent florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

400 ppm 8-HQS with 4% sucrose gave maximum floret circumference in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
400 ppm 8-HQS + 4% sucrosee5
Outcome
floret circumferencee5
Direction
maximume5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e5

“whereas, 400 ppm 8-HQS + 4% sucrose (C8) for maximum floret longevity and floret circumference as well as maximum percentage of opened and lowest percentage of neck bent florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

400 ppm 8-HQS with 4% sucrose gave maximum percentage of opened florets in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
400 ppm 8-HQS + 4% sucrosee5
Outcome
percentage of openede5
Direction
maximume5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e5

“whereas, 400 ppm 8-HQS + 4% sucrose (C8) for maximum floret longevity and floret circumference as well as maximum percentage of opened and lowest percentage of neck bent florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

400 ppm 8-HQS with 4% sucrose gave lowest percentage of neck bent florets in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
400 ppm 8-HQS + 4% sucrosee5
Outcome
percentage of neck bent floretse5
Direction
loweste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e5

“whereas, 400 ppm 8-HQS + 4% sucrose (C8) for maximum floret longevity and floret circumference as well as maximum percentage of opened and lowest percentage of neck bent florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 ppm silver nitrate with 4% sucrose gave lowest loss of water in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
50 ppm silver nitrate + 4% sucrosee6
Outcome
loss of watere6
Direction
loweste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e6

“The treatment, 50 ppm silver nitrate + 4% sucrose (C3) exhibited lowest loss of water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting on 1 October with 500 ppm aluminum sulphate and 4% sucrose gave maximum vase life of spike in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
1st October with 500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrosee7
Outcome
vase life of spikee7
Direction
maximume7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e7

“In case of interaction effect, 1st October with 500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrose (D8C6) was found superior for maximum vase life of spike, highest uptake of water and fresh weight of spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting on 1 October with 500 ppm aluminum sulphate and 4% sucrose gave highest uptake of water and fresh weight of spike in tuberose

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
1st October with 500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrosee7
Outcome
uptake of water and fresh weight of spikee7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of tuberose cv. Double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
e7

“In case of interaction effect, 1st October with 500 ppm aluminum sulphate + 4% sucrose (D8C6) was found superior for maximum vase life of spike, highest uptake of water and fresh weight of spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1149 · show in text ↑

sucrose · quality: postharvest · Agave amica (tuberose)Results differ

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

aluminium atom · quality: postharvest · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sucrose · nutrient: content · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sulfate · quality: postharvest · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sucrose · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.