Paper · 2026 · Plants

Effect of Aqueous Extracts of Orange Peel Biochar on Seed Germination and Early Seedling Growth of Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and Common Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.)

Barbora Tunklová; Jan Velebil; Jan Malaťák; et al.

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of aqueous extracts of orange peel–derived biochar on seed germination and early seedling growth in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.). Biochar was produced by pyrolysis of orange peel at temperatures ranging from 250 to 550 °C. Germination assays were conducted under controlled laboratory conditions, and seedling growth parameters were evaluated after six days of cultivation. Untreated orange peel completely inhibited seed germination (0 %) in both species, while biochar produced at 250 °C significantly reduced germination (e.g., the germination index decreased from 54.21 % in the control to 47.2 % in T. durum). In contrast, biochar produced at 350 °C increased germination to >96 % in T. durum and 100 % in F. esculentum, accompanied by enhanced seedling vigor and biomass production. Chemical analyses revealed a pronounced decrease in total phenolic content (from 53.84 to 0.57 mg GAE g−1 DW) and flavonoids (from 90.05 to 1.34 mg QE g−1 DW) with increasing pyrolysis temperature, along with a reduction in antioxidant activity. Common buckwheat exhibited consistently higher tolerance to biochar extracts than durum wheat across all treatments. Overall, the results demonstrate that pyrolysis temperature is a key factor governing the transition from phytotoxic to biostimulatory effects, with optimal performance observed at approximately 350 °C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated orange peel completely inhibited germination in both species.

Treatment
Untreated orange peele0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
completely inhibitede0
Value
0 %e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Untreated orange peel completely inhibited seed germination (0 %) in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and Common Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 99–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 250 °C reduced the germination index in durum wheat.

Treatment
biochar produced at 250 °Ce0
Outcome
germination indexe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
47.2 %e0
Qualifier
54.21 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar produced at 250 °C significantly reduced germination (e.g., the germination index decreased from 54.21 % in the control to 47.2 % in T. durum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 350 °C increased durum wheat germination to over 96%.

Treatment
biochar produced at 350 °Ce0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
>96 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar produced at 350 °C increased germination to >96 % in T. durum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 350 °C increased common buckwheat germination to 100%.

Taxon
F. esculentumFagopyrum esculentume0
Treatment
biochar produced at 350 °Ce0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
100 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar produced at 350 °C increased germination to >96 % in T. durum and 100 % in F. esculentum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 350 °C enhanced seedling vigor and biomass production.

Treatment
biochar produced at 350 °Ce0
Outcome
seedling vigor and biomass productione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“biochar produced at 350 °C increased germination to >96 % in T. durum and 100 % in F. esculentum, accompanied by enhanced seedling vigor and biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and Common Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 99–185 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolic content of the biochar extracts declined as pyrolysis temperature increased.

Treatment
pyrolysis temperaturee0
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
53.84 to 0.57 mg GAE g−1 DWe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in total phenolic content (from 53.84 to 0.57 mg GAE g−1 DW) and flavonoids (from 90.05 to 1.34 mg QE g−1 DW) with increasing pyrolysis temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1079 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavonoids of the biochar extracts declined as pyrolysis temperature increased.

Treatment
pyrolysis temperaturee0
Outcome
flavonoidse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
90.05 to 1.34 mg QE g−1 DWe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in total phenolic content (from 53.84 to 0.57 mg GAE g−1 DW) and flavonoids (from 90.05 to 1.34 mg QE g−1 DW) with increasing pyrolysis temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1079 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant activity declined as pyrolysis temperature rose.

Treatment
pyrolysis temperaturee0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“with increasing pyrolysis temperature, along with a reduction in antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common buckwheat tolerated biochar extracts better than durum wheat across treatments.

Taxon
Common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume0
Outcome
tolerance to biochar extractse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
across all treatmentse0
Comparator
durum wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common buckwheat exhibited consistently higher tolerance to biochar extracts than durum wheat across all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1244 · show in text ↑

biochar · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.