Paper · 2026 · Frontiers in Insect Science

Responses of cotton jassid (Amrasca biguttula) to synthetic insecticides recommended in Tanzania

Joseph Elias Nyesse; Gration Mutashoberwa Rwegasira; Luseko Amos Chilagane

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: ) have emerged as the most damaging sucking pest in cotton production in Tanzania, causing yield losses of up to 50% when unmanaged. Control has largely depended on synthetic insecticides; however, their effectiveness has been questioned by growers. It remains unclear whether this reduced efficacy is due to inherent properties of the insecticides or to external factors such as application rate, timing, and method. Methods: Replicated field experiments were conducted at three locations within the Western and Eastern Cotton Growing Areas (WCGA and ECGA) of Tanzania during the 2024-2025 growing season. Four commonly recommended insecticides: Lambda-cyhalothrin, Chlorpyrifos, Imidacloprid, and Profenofos were evaluated alongside an untreated control using a randomised complete block design (RCBD). Applications were based on the economic threshold level (ETL = 1-2 jassids per plant) at 10 -14 day intervals. Mortality was assessed at 24, 48, and 72 hours post-application, and population reduction was calculated using Abbott's formula. Data were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), with means separated using Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at 95% confidence. Results: All tested insecticides significantly reduced both nymph and adult jassid populations compared to the control, although their efficacy varied. Imidacloprid was the most effective, achieving mean reductions of 67.59% (nymphs) and 66.31% (adults), followed by profenofos with reductions of 52.75% (nymphs) and 55.83% (adults). Discussion: The results demonstrate that insecticide effectiveness varies considerably, with Imidacloprid showing superior performance under field conditions. These findings suggest that its inclusion in integrated pest management (IPM) programmes could improve jassid control. However, optimisation of application practices remains essential to enhance overall efficacy and sustainability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid reduced nymphs jassids by 67.59%.

Organ / stage
nymphse1
Treatment
Imidaclopride1
Interactor
jassidt0pest
Outcome
jassid populationse0
Direction
reductionse1
Value
67.59%e1
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton jassid (Amrasca biguttula)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“All tested insecticides significantly reduced both nymph and adult jassid populations compared to the control, although their efficacy varied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1347 · show in text ↑
e1

“Imidacloprid was the most effective, achieving mean reductions of 67.59% (nymphs) and 66.31% (adults), followed by profenofos with reductions of 52.75% (nymphs) and 55.83% (adults).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid reduced adults jassids by 66.31%.

Organ / stage
adultse1
Treatment
Imidaclopride1
Interactor
jassidt0pest
Outcome
jassid populationse0
Direction
reductionse1
Value
66.31%e1
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton jassid (Amrasca biguttula)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“All tested insecticides significantly reduced both nymph and adult jassid populations compared to the control, although their efficacy varied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1347 · show in text ↑
e1

“Imidacloprid was the most effective, achieving mean reductions of 67.59% (nymphs) and 66.31% (adults), followed by profenofos with reductions of 52.75% (nymphs) and 55.83% (adults).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

profenofos reduced nymphs jassids by 52.75%.

Organ / stage
nymphse1
Treatment
profenofose1
Interactor
jassidt0pest
Outcome
jassid populationse0
Direction
reductionse1
Value
52.75%e1
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton jassid (Amrasca biguttula)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“All tested insecticides significantly reduced both nymph and adult jassid populations compared to the control, although their efficacy varied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1347 · show in text ↑
e1

“Imidacloprid was the most effective, achieving mean reductions of 67.59% (nymphs) and 66.31% (adults), followed by profenofos with reductions of 52.75% (nymphs) and 55.83% (adults).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

profenofos reduced adults jassids by 55.83%.

Organ / stage
adultse1
Treatment
profenofose1
Interactor
jassidt0pest
Outcome
jassid populationse0
Direction
reductionse1
Value
55.83%e1
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton jassid (Amrasca biguttula)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“All tested insecticides significantly reduced both nymph and adult jassid populations compared to the control, although their efficacy varied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1347 · show in text ↑
e1

“Imidacloprid was the most effective, achieving mean reductions of 67.59% (nymphs) and 66.31% (adults), followed by profenofos with reductions of 52.75% (nymphs) and 55.83% (adults).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1529 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid was the most effective tested insecticide.

Treatment
Imidaclopride1
Interactor
jassidt0pest
Outcome
most effectivee1
Direction
most effectivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton jassid (Amrasca biguttula)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Imidacloprid was the most effective, achieving mean reductions of 67.59% (nymphs) and 66.31% (adults), followed by profenofos with reductions of 52.75% (nymphs) and 55.83% (adults).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1529 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest including imidacloprid in IPM for jassid control.

Treatment
Imidaclopride1
Interactor
jassidt0pest
Outcome
inclusion in integrated pest management (IPM) programmes could improve jassid controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton jassid (Amrasca biguttula)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Imidacloprid was the most effective, achieving mean reductions of 67.59% (nymphs) and 66.31% (adults), followed by profenofos with reductions of 52.75% (nymphs) and 55.83% (adults).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1529 · show in text ↑
e2

“These findings suggest that its inclusion in integrated pest management (IPM) programmes could improve jassid control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1807 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend optimizing application practices for efficacy and sustainability.

Outcome
optimisation of application practices remains essential to enhance overall efficacy and sustainabilitye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton jassid (Amrasca biguttula)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–46 · show in text ↑
e3

“optimisation of application practices remains essential to enhance overall efficacy and sustainability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–1920 · show in text ↑

profenofos · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.