Paper · 2025 · Journal of Krishi Vigyan

Effect of Zinc and Boron Application on Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Residual Soil Fertility in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Pradeep Kumar; A S Rajput; P D Verma

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AbstractMicronutrient management plays a crucial role in enhancing wheat productivity and soil fertility. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of zinc (Zn) and boron (B) application on wheat growth, yield, nutrient uptake, and post-harvest soil fertility. The experiment included different Zn and B application methods, with a focus on foliar and soil applications. Among the treatments, the combined foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%) recorded the highest plant height, advanced flowering (67.4 d), and earliest physiological maturity (112.63 d), indicating improved vegetative growth and crop development. The highest grain (44.57 q/ha) and straw yield (58.4 q/ha) were observed in foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%), followed by soil application of Zn (25 kg/ha) and B (2 kg/ha). Enhanced nutrient uptake in foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%) resulted in the highest Zn (38.27 mg/kg in grain, 26.47 mg/kg in straw) and B (8.30 mg/kg in grain, 5.33 mg/kg in straw) concentrations. Post-harvest soil analysis revealed that residual Zn (1.47 mg/kg) and B (1.08 mg/kg) were highest in soil application of Zn (25 kg/ha) and B (2 kg/ha), suggesting a stronger residual effect through soil application. Correlation analysis confirmed a significant positive relationship between Zn and B uptake and yield components, emphasizing their essential role in wheat productivity. The results suggest that an integrated Zn and B fertilization strategy, particularly combining soil and foliar applications, can enhance wheat growth, improve yield, and sustain soil fertility. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing micronutrient management in wheat cultivation to ensure long-term productivity and soil health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar Zn and B produced the highest wheat plant height.

Treatment
foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%) recorded the highest plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–491 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar Zn and B advanced wheat flowering to 67.4 days.

Treatment
foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%)e1
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
advancede0
Value
67.4 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“advanced flowering (67.4 d)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–520 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–457 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar Zn and B produced earliest physiological maturity at 112.63 days.

Treatment
foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%)e1
Outcome
physiological maturitye0
Direction
earlieste0
Value
112.63 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“earliest physiological maturity (112.63 d)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–568 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–457 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn and B gave the highest wheat grain yield, 44.57 q/ha.

Treatment
foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%)e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
44.57 q/hae0
Comparator
soil application of Zn (25 kg/ha) and B (2 kg/ha)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain (44.57 q/ha) and straw yield (58.4 q/ha) were observed in foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%), followed by soil application of Zn (25 kg/ha) and B (2 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn and B gave the highest wheat straw yield, 58.4 q/ha.

Treatment
foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%)e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
58.4 q/hae0
Comparator
soil application of Zn (25 kg/ha) and B (2 kg/ha)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain (44.57 q/ha) and straw yield (58.4 q/ha) were observed in foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%), followed by soil application of Zn (25 kg/ha) and B (2 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn and B produced the highest grain Zn concentration, 38.27 mg/kg.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%)e0
Outcome
concentrationse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
38.27 mg/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced nutrient uptake in foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%) resulted in the highest Zn (38.27 mg/kg in grain, 26.47 mg/kg in straw) and B (8.30 mg/kg in grain, 5.33 mg/kg in straw) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn and B produced the highest straw Zn concentration, 26.47 mg/kg.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%)e0
Outcome
concentrationse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
26.47 mg/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced nutrient uptake in foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%) resulted in the highest Zn (38.27 mg/kg in grain, 26.47 mg/kg in straw) and B (8.30 mg/kg in grain, 5.33 mg/kg in straw) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn and B produced the highest grain B concentration, 8.30 mg/kg.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%)e0
Outcome
concentrationse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.30 mg/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced nutrient uptake in foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%) resulted in the highest Zn (38.27 mg/kg in grain, 26.47 mg/kg in straw) and B (8.30 mg/kg in grain, 5.33 mg/kg in straw) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn and B produced the highest straw B concentration, 5.33 mg/kg.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%)e0
Outcome
concentrationse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.33 mg/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced nutrient uptake in foliar application of Zn (0.5%) and B (0.2%) resulted in the highest Zn (38.27 mg/kg in grain, 26.47 mg/kg in straw) and B (8.30 mg/kg in grain, 5.33 mg/kg in straw) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn and B application left the highest residual soil Zn, 1.47 mg/kg.

Treatment
soil application of Zn (25 kg/ha) and B (2 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
residual Zne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.47 mg/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“residual Zn (1.47 mg/kg) and B (1.08 mg/kg) were highest in soil application of Zn (25 kg/ha) and B (2 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn and B application left the highest residual soil B, 1.08 mg/kg.

Treatment
soil application of Zn (25 kg/ha) and B (2 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
residual Zn (1.47 mg/kg) and Be0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.08 mg/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“residual Zn (1.47 mg/kg) and B (1.08 mg/kg) were highest in soil application of Zn (25 kg/ha) and B (2 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–130 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn and B uptake were significantly positively related to yield components.

Compound
Zn and Be0
Outcome
yield componentse0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant positive relationship between Zn and B uptake and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–130 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrating soil and foliar Zn and B fertilization to improve growth, yield and soil fertility.

Outcome
integrated Zn and B fertilization strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an integrated Zn and B fertilization strategy, particularly combining soil and foliar applications, can enhance wheat growth, improve yield, and sustain soil fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1602 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

zinc atom · phenology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · phenology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.