Abstract
Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L) grafted onto Rupestis du Lot (Vats rupestris Scheele) and 110 R (Vitis berlandieri x Vitis rupestris) were grown in soil sand sphagnum peat and farmyard manure mixture (2 1 1 1 v/v) irrigated with 03 27 and 545 dS m (1) NaCl solutions for a period of 60 days Biomass accumulation relative chlorophyll content leaf water potential stomatal conductance and transpiration were significantly reduced by salinity in all graft combinations The inhibiting effect of salinity on growth varied according to the characteristics of the scion genotype and the level of salinity The results imply the predominance of the scion genotype in determining variation in the leaf level physiological characteristics of grafted vines because stomatal conductance and transpiration were higher in Sultana than in Muskule at the same leaf water potential and the level of salinity regardless of the rootstock genotype NaCl treatments did not affect leaf Cu concentration while inducing significant Na K Ca N P Mg Fe Mn and Zn elevations in the leaves of all scion/rootstock combinations While salinity caused an increase in N content and a decrease in K content in the roots of all graft combinations it had no influence on Ca P Cu and Zn concentrations In contrast to the Sultana grafted vines NaCl salinity led to a decrease in Mg Fe and Mn concentrations in the roots of Muskule grafted vines Nevertheless ion accumulation in leaves and roots of grafted vines under saline or non saline conditions was controlled predominantly by the genotype of the scion In response to salinity Sultana grafts accumulated higher amounts of ions in their leaves than in their roots However in Muskule higher ion concentrations were seen in the roots Therefore the increase in the transport of inorganic ions up to the leaves seems to be the major component of osmotic adjustment in salt stressed Sultana vines
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity reduced biomass accumulation, relative chlorophyll content and leaf water potential of grafted grapevines.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera
Vitis viniferae0 - Treatment
- salinitye1
- Outcome
- Biomass accumulation relative chlorophyll content leaf water potentiale1
- Direction
- reducede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e1“Biomass accumulation relative chlorophyll content leaf water potential stomatal conductance and transpiration were significantly reduced by salinity in all graft combinations”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity reduced stomatal conductance and transpiration of grafted grapevines.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Treatment
- salinitye1
- Outcome
- stomatal conductance and transpiratione1
- Direction
- reducede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e1“Biomass accumulation relative chlorophyll content leaf water potential stomatal conductance and transpiration were significantly reduced by salinity in all graft combinations”
Claim · model-written summary
NaCl treatments did not affect leaf Cu concentration of grafted grapevines.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Treatment
- NaCl treatmentse2
- Outcome
- leaf Cu concentratione2
- Direction
- did not affecte2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e2“NaCl treatments did not affect leaf Cu concentration while inducing significant Na K Ca N P Mg Fe Mn and Zn elevations in the leaves of all scion/rootstock combinations”
Claim · model-written summary
NaCl treatments significantly elevated leaf Na, K and Ca in grafted grapevines.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Organ / stage
- leavese2
- Treatment
- NaCl treatmentse2
- Outcome
- Na K Cae2
- Direction
- elevationse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e2“NaCl treatments did not affect leaf Cu concentration while inducing significant Na K Ca N P Mg Fe Mn and Zn elevations in the leaves of all scion/rootstock combinations”
Claim · model-written summary
NaCl treatments significantly elevated leaf N, P and Mg in grafted grapevines.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Organ / stage
- leavese2
- Treatment
- NaCl treatmentse2
- Outcome
- N P Mge2
- Direction
- elevationse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e2“NaCl treatments did not affect leaf Cu concentration while inducing significant Na K Ca N P Mg Fe Mn and Zn elevations in the leaves of all scion/rootstock combinations”
Claim · model-written summary
NaCl treatments significantly elevated leaf Fe, Mn and Zn in grafted grapevines.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Organ / stage
- leavese2
- Treatment
- NaCl treatmentse2
- Outcome
- Fe Mn and Zne2
- Direction
- elevationse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e2“NaCl treatments did not affect leaf Cu concentration while inducing significant Na K Ca N P Mg Fe Mn and Zn elevations in the leaves of all scion/rootstock combinations”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity increased N content in grapevine roots.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Organ / stage
- rootse3
- Treatment
- salinitye3
- Outcome
- N contente3
- Direction
- increasee3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e3“While salinity caused an increase in N content and a decrease in K content in the roots of all graft combinations it had no influence on Ca P Cu and Zn concentrations”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity decreased K content in grapevine roots.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Organ / stage
- rootse3
- Treatment
- salinitye3
- Outcome
- K contente3
- Direction
- decreasee3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e3“While salinity caused an increase in N content and a decrease in K content in the roots of all graft combinations it had no influence on Ca P Cu and Zn concentrations”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity had no influence on Ca and P concentrations in grapevine roots.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Organ / stage
- rootse3
- Treatment
- salinitye3
- Outcome
- Ca Pe3
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e3“While salinity caused an increase in N content and a decrease in K content in the roots of all graft combinations it had no influence on Ca P Cu and Zn concentrations”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity had no influence on Cu and Zn concentrations in grapevine roots.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Organ / stage
- rootse3
- Treatment
- salinitye3
- Outcome
- Cu and Zn concentrationse3
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e3“While salinity caused an increase in N content and a decrease in K content in the roots of all graft combinations it had no influence on Ca P Cu and Zn concentrations”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity decreased Mg, Fe and Mn concentrations in roots of Muskule grafted vines, unlike Sultana.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Material
- Muskulee7
- Organ / stage
- rootse7
- Treatment
- NaCl salinitye7
- Outcome
- Mg Fe and Mn concentrationse7
- Direction
- decreasee7
- Comparator
- Sultana grafted vinese7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e7“In contrast to the Sultana grafted vines NaCl salinity led to a decrease in Mg Fe and Mn concentrations in the roots of Muskule grafted vines”
Claim · model-written summary
Muskule grafted vines had higher ion concentrations in roots than leaves.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Material
- Muskulee6
- Organ / stage
- rootse6
- Outcome
- ion concentrationse6
- Direction
- highere6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e6“However in Muskule higher ion concentrations were seen in the roots”
Claim · model-written summary
Sultana grafts accumulated higher amounts of ions in leaves than roots under salinity.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Material
- Sultana graftse5
- Organ / stage
- leavese5
- Treatment
- salinitye5
- Outcome
- amounts of ions in their leavese5
- Direction
- highere5
- Comparator
- their rootse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e5“In response to salinity Sultana grafts accumulated higher amounts of ions in their leaves than in their roots”
Claim · model-written summary
Ion accumulation in leaves and roots of grafted vines was controlled predominantly by scion genotype.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Outcome
- ion accumulation in leaves and rootse4
- Qualifier
- controlled predominantly by the genotype of the scione4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e4“Nevertheless ion accumulation in leaves and roots of grafted vines under saline or non saline conditions was controlled predominantly by the genotype of the scion”
Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic adjustment in salt-stressed Sultana vines is mainly due to increased transport of inorganic ions up to the leaves.
Verbatim
e7“Therefore the increase in the transport of inorganic ions up to the leaves seems to be the major component of osmotic adjustment in salt stressed Sultana vines”
Claim · model-written summary
Stomatal conductance and transpiration were higher in Sultana than in Muskule grafted vines at the same leaf water potential and salinity.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Material
- Sultanae7
- Outcome
- stomatal conductance and transpiratione7
- Direction
- highere7
- Comparator
- Muskulee7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-year old Sultana and Muskule vines (Vitis vinifera L)”
e7“The results imply the predominance of the scion genotype in determining variation in the leaf level physiological characteristics of grafted vines because stomatal conductance and transpiration were higher in Sultana than in Muskule at the same leaf water potential and the level of salinity regardless of the rootstock genotype”
The same questions in other papers
sodium chloride · nutrient: content · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
salinity · physiology: water · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
salinity · physiology: gas exchange · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
salinity · nutrient: content · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- negative
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.