Paper · 1996 · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

Mode of action of the drying emulsion used in dried vine fruit production.: I. The effect of inorganic ions and fatty acid esters

B.A. UHLIG; R.R. WALKER; R. STOREY

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Drying of Sultana grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) in Australia is enhanced by the berries being dipped in or sprayed with an alkaline oil-in-water drying emulsion consisting of K2CO3 and a mixture of ethyl esters of fatty acids. The relative importance of the nature of the cation and anion of the alkali salts of the drying emulsion and the relative effectiveness of the different fatty acid esters on the drying rate was investigated. When salt solutions used as dip were applied with commercial drying oil, water loss increased with decreasing hydrated ionic radius of the alkali cation and followed the lyotropic series Cs+ > Rb+ > K+ > Na+= Li+, with Ca2+= Li+. Carbonate was the most effective anion, while S2O52--, HP2O5--, OH-, I-and Cl- gave responses which were similar to or less than the water control, depending on the presence or absence of drying oil. The interaction between cation and commercial drying oil seemed to be additive or synergistic. Without commercial drying oil, the CO32– salts of Cs+, Rb+, K+ and Na+ all produced higher drying rates than those of Li+ and Ca2+, with the Cs+ and Rb+ salts having the greatest effect. When emulsified with 2% ethyl oleate instead of commercial drying oil, all salts with CO32– as anion produced faster drying, and their ranking was the same with both emulsifiers. However, when the Cl“salts were used with 2% ethyl oleate, all cations produced similar and fast drying. The saturated fatty acid esters, caprylic acid ethyl ester and stearic acid ethyl ester, had little effect on drying rates whereas the unsaturated fatty acid esters, ethyl oleate, butyl oleate and ethyl linoleate, increased water loss two-fold compared with H2O treatment. The results are discussed with particular emphasis on the role of the molecular structure of the cuticle in regulating water loss from grape berries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water loss from grape berries increased with decreasing hydrated ionic radius of the alkali cation when salt solutions were applied with commercial drying oil.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
salt solutions used as dip were applied with commercial drying oile1
Compound
alkali catione1
Outcome
water losse1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sultana grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“When salt solutions used as dip were applied with commercial drying oil, water loss increased with decreasing hydrated ionic radius of the alkali cation and followed the lyotropic series Cs+ > Rb+ > K+ > Na+= Li+, with Ca2+= Li+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbonate was the most effective anion for water loss from grape berries; other anions were similar to or less effective than the water control.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
salt solutions used as dipe1
Compound
Carbonatee2
Outcome
water losse1
Direction
most effectivee2
Comparator
S2O52--, HP2O5--, OH-, I-and Cl-e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sultana grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“When salt solutions used as dip were applied with commercial drying oil, water loss increased with decreasing hydrated ionic radius of the alkali cation and followed the lyotropic series Cs+ > Rb+ > K+ > Na+= Li+, with Ca2+= Li+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–660 · show in text ↑
e2

“Carbonate was the most effective anion, while S2O52--, HP2O5--, OH-, I-and Cl- gave responses which were similar to or less than the water control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–808 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between cation and commercial drying oil seemed to be additive or synergistic for water loss from grape berries.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
commercial drying oile3
Outcome
interaction between cation and commercial drying oile3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sultana grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–44 · show in text ↑
e3

“The interaction between cation and commercial drying oil seemed to be additive or synergistic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without commercial drying oil, CO32– salts of Cs+, Rb+, K+ and Na+ produced higher drying rates than the salts of Li+ and Ca2+.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
CO32– salts of Cs+, Rb+, K+ and Na+e4
Outcome
drying ratese4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
those of Li+ and Ca2+e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sultana grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–44 · show in text ↑
e4

“Without commercial drying oil, the CO32– salts of Cs+, Rb+, K+ and Na+ all produced higher drying rates than those of Li+ and Ca2+, with the Cs+ and Rb+ salts having the greatest effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without commercial drying oil, Cs+ and Rb+ salts had the greatest effect among the CO32– salts.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
Cs+ and Rb+ saltse4
Outcome
effecte4
Direction
greateste4
Comparator
K+ and Na+e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sultana grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–44 · show in text ↑
e4

“Without commercial drying oil, the CO32– salts of Cs+, Rb+, K+ and Na+ all produced higher drying rates than those of Li+ and Ca2+, with the Cs+ and Rb+ salts having the greatest effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 2% ethyl oleate instead of commercial drying oil, all CO32– salts gave faster drying, and their ranking was the same with both emulsifiers.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
emulsified with 2% ethyl oleatee5
Outcome
dryinge5
Direction
fastere5
Qualifier
their ranking was the same with both emulsifierse5
Comparator
commercial drying oile5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sultana grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–44 · show in text ↑
e5

“When emulsified with 2% ethyl oleate instead of commercial drying oil, all salts with CO32– as anion produced faster drying, and their ranking was the same with both emulsifiers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 2% ethyl oleate, all cations of the Cl– salts gave similar and fast drying.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
the Cl“salts were used with 2% ethyl oleatee6
Outcome
dryinge6
Direction
similar and faste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sultana grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–44 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, when the Cl“salts were used with 2% ethyl oleate, all cations produced similar and fast drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturated fatty acid esters, caprylic acid ethyl ester and stearic acid ethyl ester, had little effect on drying rates of grape berries.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
caprylic acid ethyl ester and stearic acid ethyl estere7
Outcome
drying ratese7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sultana grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–44 · show in text ↑
e7

“The saturated fatty acid esters, caprylic acid ethyl ester and stearic acid ethyl ester, had little effect on drying rates whereas the unsaturated fatty acid esters, ethyl oleate, butyl oleate and ethyl linoleate, increased water loss two-fold compared with H2O treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unsaturated fatty acid esters, ethyl oleate, butyl oleate and ethyl linoleate, increased water loss two-fold compared with the H2O treatment.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
unsaturated fatty acid esters, ethyl oleate, butyl oleate and ethyl linoleatee7
Outcome
water losse7
Direction
increasede7
Value
two-folde7
Comparator
H2O treatmente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sultana grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–44 · show in text ↑
e7

“The saturated fatty acid esters, caprylic acid ethyl ester and stearic acid ethyl ester, had little effect on drying rates whereas the unsaturated fatty acid esters, ethyl oleate, butyl oleate and ethyl linoleate, increased water loss two-fold compared with H2O treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1699 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: water · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.