Paper · 2026 · Horticulturae

Effects of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and the Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato

Guangyan Sun; Zhenpeng Deng; Ruina Zhao; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biochar and organic fertilizers are recommended for sustaining crop yield and sustainable agricultural development. However, the mechanisms of their combined application on the nutritional, flavor and eating quality and their optimal ratio remain unclear in sweet potatoes. Therefore, this field experiment employed four fertilization treatments: inorganic compound fertilizer (CF), organic fertilizer (OF), and biochar-based organic fertilizer containing 15% biochar (BOF15) or 30% biochar (BOF30). The results revealed that the OF, BOF15, and BOF30 treatments significantly ameliorated soil physical properties, elevated soil pH values and available nutrient contents compared with CF. They also increased sweet potato yield, regulated sucrose-metabolizing enzyme, and enhanced quality. Among them, the BOF15 treatment exhibited the most significant improvement. Compared with CF, BOF15 treatment increased the contents of starch, total soluble sugar, sucrose, and β-carotene by 23.16–31.82%. It also optimized texture by reducing hardness and chewiness while increasing springiness, elevated key volatile compounds (terpene and aldehyde), and received the highest sensory scores for mealiness, aroma, and sweetness. In conclusion, biochar combined with organic fertilizer synergistically improves soil properties and enhances sweet potato yield and quality, with BOF15 being the optimal treatment. This study provides support for optimizing fertilization strategies in high-quality sweet potato production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OF, BOF15 and BOF30 treatments significantly ameliorated soil physical properties compared with CF

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
OF, BOF15, and BOF30 treatmentse2
Outcome
soil physical propertiese2
Direction
amelioratede2
Comparator
CFe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and the Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results revealed that the OF, BOF15, and BOF30 treatments significantly ameliorated soil physical properties, elevated soil pH values and available nutrient contents compared with CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OF, BOF15 and BOF30 treatments significantly elevated soil pH and available nutrient contents compared with CF

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
OF, BOF15, and BOF30 treatmentse2
Outcome
soil pH values and available nutrient contentse2
Direction
elevatede2
Comparator
CFe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and the Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results revealed that the OF, BOF15, and BOF30 treatments significantly ameliorated soil physical properties, elevated soil pH values and available nutrient contents compared with CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OF, BOF15 and BOF30 treatments increased sweet potato yield

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
OF, BOF15, and BOF30 treatmentse2
Outcome
sweet potato yielde3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and the Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results revealed that the OF, BOF15, and BOF30 treatments significantly ameliorated soil physical properties, elevated soil pH values and available nutrient contents compared with CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–686 · show in text ↑
e3

“They also increased sweet potato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BOF15 treatment increased starch, total soluble sugar and sucrose contents of sweet potato by 23.16–31.82% relative to CF

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
BOF15 treatmente4
Outcome
starch, total soluble sugar, sucrosee4
Direction
increasede4
Value
23.16–31.82%e4
Comparator
CFe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and the Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared with CF, BOF15 treatment increased the contents of starch, total soluble sugar, sucrose, and β-carotene by 23.16–31.82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BOF15 treatment increased β-carotene content of sweet potato by 23.16–31.82% relative to CF

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
BOF15 treatmente4
Outcome
β-carotenee4
Direction
increasede4
Value
23.16–31.82%e4
Comparator
CFe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and the Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared with CF, BOF15 treatment increased the contents of starch, total soluble sugar, sucrose, and β-carotene by 23.16–31.82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BOF15 treatment reduced hardness and chewiness of sweet potato

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
BOF15 treatmente4
Outcome
hardness and chewinesse5
Direction
reducinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and the Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared with CF, BOF15 treatment increased the contents of starch, total soluble sugar, sucrose, and β-carotene by 23.16–31.82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–993 · show in text ↑
e5

“It also optimized texture by reducing hardness and chewiness while increasing springiness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BOF15 treatment increased springiness of sweet potato

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
BOF15 treatmente4
Outcome
springinesse5
Direction
increasinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and the Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared with CF, BOF15 treatment increased the contents of starch, total soluble sugar, sucrose, and β-carotene by 23.16–31.82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–993 · show in text ↑
e5

“It also optimized texture by reducing hardness and chewiness while increasing springiness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1084 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Key volatile compounds (terpene and aldehyde) were elevated in sweet potato under the BOF15 treatment

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
key volatile compounds (terpene and aldehyde)e6
Direction
elevatede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and the Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e6

“elevated key volatile compounds (terpene and aldehyde)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet potato under the BOF15 treatment received the highest sensory scores for mealiness, aroma and sweetness

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
sensory scores for mealiness, aroma, and sweetnesse7
Direction
higheste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and the Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e7

“received the highest sensory scores for mealiness, aroma, and sweetness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1217 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar combined with organic fertilizer, with BOF15 as the optimal treatment, is recommended for high-quality sweet potato production

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
biochar combined with organic fertilizere1
Outcome
optimal treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and the Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“biochar combined with organic fertilizer synergistically improves soil properties and enhances sweet potato yield and quality, with BOF15 being the optimal treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1399 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 126 positive, 19 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

biochar · quality: postharvest · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

biochar · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.