Paper · 2026 · Weed Research

Effects of Agroecological Treatments Based on Mulch and Fermented Nettle Extract on Weed Management and Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) Productivity

Manal Zouhar; Nabila El Alami; Mohamed Kouighat; et al.

10
claims
34
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Weed competition is a major constraint to chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) production under low‐input agroecological systems. A two‐season field study (2021–2022 and 2022–2023) conducted at the Experimental Farm of the National School of Agriculture, Meknès, Morocco, evaluated seven treatments (T0–T6) arranged in a randomised complete block design with three replications: T0, unweeded control; T1, manual weeding; T2, wheat straw mulch; T3, sawdust mulch; T4, wheat straw + 5% fermented nettle extract ( Urtica dioica ); T5, wheat straw + 10% fermented nettle extract and T6, sawdust + 10% fermented nettle extract. Mulches were applied at the early vegetative stage, and fermented extracts were applied once as a foliar spray at the late vegetative stage to enhance crop growth and competitiveness. Weed control efficiency (WCE), based on aboveground weed biomass, indicated that T3 and T4 were the most effective treatments in the first year (92.2% and 77.9%, respectively), whereas T5 and T6 achieved 91.6% and 78.7% in the second year. Grain yield was highest under T3 (1.95 t ha −1 ) and T5 (1.82 t ha −1 ) in the first year, and under T6 (2.06 t ha −1 ) and T3 (1.61 t ha −1 ) in the second year, all significantly higher than T0. Nodule dry weight, number of seeds per plant and 100‐seed weight were also improved, likely due to reduced weed competition, improved soil microclimate resulting from mulching and enhanced nutrient availability from the fermented nettle extract. These results demonstrate that combining organic mulches with foliar bioinputs can effectively suppress weeds and increase chickpea productivity, offering a sustainable strategy for semi‐arid agroecological systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust mulch achieved 92.2% weed control efficiency in the first year.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
sawdust mulche1
Outcome
most effective treatmentse2
Direction
most effectivee2
Value
92.2%e2
Qualifier
first yeare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“T3, sawdust mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–464 · show in text ↑
e2

“T3 and T4 were the most effective treatments in the first year (92.2% and 77.9%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw plus 5% fermented nettle extract achieved 77.9% weed control efficiency in the first year.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
wheat straw + 5% fermented nettle extracte1
Outcome
most effective treatmentse2
Direction
most effectivee2
Value
77.9%e2
Qualifier
first yeare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“T4, wheat straw + 5% fermented nettle extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–511 · show in text ↑
e2

“T3 and T4 were the most effective treatments in the first year (92.2% and 77.9%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw plus 10% fermented nettle extract achieved 91.6% weed control efficiency in the second year.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
wheat straw + 10% fermented nettle extracte1
Outcome
Weed control efficiency (WCE)e3
Value
91.6%e2
Qualifier
second yeare2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5, wheat straw + 10% fermented nettle extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–577 · show in text ↑
e2

“T5 and T6 achieved 91.6% and 78.7% in the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1048 · show in text ↑
e3

“Weed control efficiency (WCE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust plus 10% fermented nettle extract achieved 78.7% weed control efficiency in the second year.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
sawdust + 10% fermented nettle extracte1
Outcome
Weed control efficiency (WCE)e3
Value
78.7%e2
Qualifier
second yeare2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“T6, sawdust + 10% fermented nettle extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–624 · show in text ↑
e2

“T5 and T6 achieved 91.6% and 78.7% in the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1048 · show in text ↑
e3

“Weed control efficiency (WCE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust mulch produced the highest grain yield of 1.95 t ha −1 in the first year, significantly above the unweeded control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
sawdust mulche1
Outcome
Grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
1.95 t ha −1e2
Qualifier
first yeare2
Comparator
unweeded controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“T3, sawdust mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–464 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain yield was highest under T3 (1.95 t ha −1 ) and T5 (1.82 t ha −1 ) in the first year, and under T6 (2.06 t ha −1 ) and T3 (1.61 t ha −1 ) in the second year, all significantly higher than T0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1245 · show in text ↑
e3

“T0, unweeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw plus 10% fermented nettle extract yielded 1.82 t ha −1 in the first year, significantly above unweeded control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
wheat straw + 10% fermented nettle extracte1
Outcome
Grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
1.82 t ha −1e2
Qualifier
first yeare2
Comparator
unweeded controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5, wheat straw + 10% fermented nettle extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–577 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain yield was highest under T3 (1.95 t ha −1 ) and T5 (1.82 t ha −1 ) in the first year, and under T6 (2.06 t ha −1 ) and T3 (1.61 t ha −1 ) in the second year, all significantly higher than T0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1245 · show in text ↑
e3

“T0, unweeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust plus 10% fermented nettle extract yielded 2.06 t ha −1 in the second year, significantly above unweeded control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
sawdust + 10% fermented nettle extracte1
Outcome
Grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
2.06 t ha −1e2
Qualifier
second yeare2
Comparator
unweeded controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“T6, sawdust + 10% fermented nettle extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–624 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain yield was highest under T3 (1.95 t ha −1 ) and T5 (1.82 t ha −1 ) in the first year, and under T6 (2.06 t ha −1 ) and T3 (1.61 t ha −1 ) in the second year, all significantly higher than T0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1245 · show in text ↑
e3

“T0, unweeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust mulch yielded 1.61 t ha −1 in the second year, significantly above unweeded control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
sawdust mulche1
Outcome
Grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
1.61 t ha −1e2
Qualifier
second yeare2
Comparator
unweeded controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“T3, sawdust mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–464 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain yield was highest under T3 (1.95 t ha −1 ) and T5 (1.82 t ha −1 ) in the first year, and under T6 (2.06 t ha −1 ) and T3 (1.61 t ha −1 ) in the second year, all significantly higher than T0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1245 · show in text ↑
e3

“T0, unweeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule dry weight, seeds per plant, and 100-seed weight also improved under the tested treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
Nodule dry weight, number of seeds per plant and 100‐seed weighte1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nodule dry weight, number of seeds per plant and 100‐seed weight were also improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1330 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that organic mulches with foliar bioinputs can suppress weeds and increase chickpea productivity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
suppress weeds and increase chickpea productivitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“combining organic mulches with foliar bioinputs can effectively suppress weeds and increase chickpea productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1637 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Triticum aestivum · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

processing · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

processing · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

growing medium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.