Paper · 2019 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Impact of Irrigation Methods, Irrigation Scheduling and Mulching on Seed Yield and Water Productivity of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

P R Kumar; Santosh S Mali; A K Singh; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to test the efficacy of irrigation methods and mulching in seed production of chickpea. Irrigation methods included drip with mulch (DM), drip without mulch (DNM) and check basin (CB) irrigation. Drip irrigation was scheduled at 1-day, 2-day and 7 days interval, while farmers’ practice of check basin irrigation at 7-day interval was considered as control. Plant parameters like height, horizontal spread, dry matter, root length and root spread, and number of pods were significantly influenced by irrigation levels and mulch. Seed yield of 17.7 and 16.8 q/ha was recorded for DM having 1-day and 2-day interval, respectively, which was about 82 and 73% higher over the control. The harvest index increased with increasing irrigation interval and was highest (57.4) under treatments with longer irrigation interval (DM7, DNM7 and CB7). Drip irrigation at 1-day and 2-day interval recorded the water productivities of 0.54 and 0.52 kg/m3, respectively as against 0.30 kg/m3 recorded in farmers practice. Polythene mulch with drip irrigation at 2-day irrigation interval is recommended for improving the yields and water productivity of chickpea cultivated under eastern plateau and hill region of India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and mulch significantly influenced plant growth parameters and pod number.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
irrigation levels and mulche0
Outcome
height, horizontal spread, dry mattere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant parameters like height, horizontal spread, dry matter, root length and root spread, and number of pods were significantly influenced by irrigation levels and mulch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with mulch at a 1-day interval yielded 17.7 q/ha, about 82% above control.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
DM having 1-daye0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
17.7e0
Qualifier
82 and 73%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield of 17.7 and 16.8 q/ha was recorded for DM having 1-day and 2-day interval, respectively, which was about 82 and 73% higher over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–708 · show in text ↑
e1

“drip with mulch (DM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with mulch at a 2-day interval yielded 16.8 q/ha, about 73% above control.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
2-day intervale0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.8 q/hae0
Qualifier
82 and 73%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield of 17.7 and 16.8 q/ha was recorded for DM having 1-day and 2-day interval, respectively, which was about 82 and 73% higher over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–708 · show in text ↑
e1

“drip with mulch (DM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index rose with irrigation interval and peaked at 57.4 under the longer intervals.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
irrigation intervale0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
57.4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The harvest index increased with increasing irrigation interval and was highest (57.4) under treatments with longer irrigation interval (DM7, DNM7 and CB7).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-day drip irrigation produced 0.54 kg/m3 water productivity.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Drip irrigation at 1-daye0
Outcome
water productivitiese0
Value
0.54e0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation at 1-day and 2-day interval recorded the water productivities of 0.54 and 0.52 kg/m3, respectively as against 0.30 kg/m3 recorded in farmers practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-day drip irrigation produced 0.52 kg/m3 water productivity.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
2-day intervale0
Outcome
water productivitiese0
Value
0.52 kg/m3e0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation at 1-day and 2-day interval recorded the water productivities of 0.54 and 0.52 kg/m3, respectively as against 0.30 kg/m3 recorded in farmers practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend polythene mulch with drip irrigation every two days in eastern India.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
Polythene mulch with drip irrigation at 2-day irrigation intervale0
Setting
eastern plateau and hill region of Indiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polythene mulch with drip irrigation at 2-day irrigation interval is recommended for improving the yields and water productivity of chickpea cultivated under eastern plateau and hill region of India.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1232 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

mulching · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.