Abstract
Chickpea blight severity caused by Ascochyta rabiei, was evaluated by planting chickpea intercropping with three other crops namely wheat, faba bean, and oilseed rape in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications.Following winter sowing, the chickpea crop cultivar IPA-510 planted in Erbil region in the beginning of January.The results showed that the combination of these crops with chickpea affected significantly on the diseases incidence.The lowest degree of infection was with combinations of chickpea with faba bean followed by combination of chickpea with the oilseed rape then chickpea with wheat compared with the control treatment (monocrop).However, this intercropping system didn't have significant effects on the percentage of pod infection and weight of 100 seed.Intercropping chickpea with companion crops showed that both oilseed rape and faba bean didn't affect on the seed yield.However, wheat as a companion crop with chickpea, is decreased the chickpea yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping significantly affected disease incidence.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- combination of these crops with chickpeae0
- Outcome
- diseases incidencee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that the combination of these crops with chickpea affected significantly on the diseases incidence.”
Claim · model-written summary
Faba bean intercrop had the lowest infection.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- chickpea with faba beane0
- Outcome
- degree of infectione0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Comparator
- control treatment (monocrop)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest degree of infection was with combinations of chickpea with faba bean followed by combination of chickpea with the oilseed rape then chickpea with wheat compared with the control treatment (monocrop).”
Claim · model-written summary
Oilseed rape intercrop ranked after faba bean for infection.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- chickpea with the oilseed rapee0
- Outcome
- degree of infectione0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Comparator
- control treatment (monocrop)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest degree of infection was with combinations of chickpea with faba bean followed by combination of chickpea with the oilseed rape then chickpea with wheat compared with the control treatment (monocrop).”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat intercrop ranked after oilseed rape for infection.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- chickpea with wheate0
- Outcome
- degree of infectione0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Comparator
- control treatment (monocrop)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest degree of infection was with combinations of chickpea with faba bean followed by combination of chickpea with the oilseed rape then chickpea with wheat compared with the control treatment (monocrop).”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping did not significantly affect pod infection or 100 seed weight.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- this intercropping systeme0
- Outcome
- percentage of pod infection and weight of 100 seede0
- Direction
- didn't have significant effectse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“this intercropping system didn't have significant effects on the percentage of pod infection and weight of 100 seed”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Oilseed rape did not affect seed yield.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- oilseed rapee0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- didn't affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping chickpea with companion crops showed that both oilseed rape and faba bean didn't affect on the seed yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
Faba bean did not affect seed yield.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- faba beane0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- didn't affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping chickpea with companion crops showed that both oilseed rape and faba bean didn't affect on the seed yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat intercrop decreased chickpea yield.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- wheat as a companion crope0
- Outcome
- chickpea yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wheat as a companion crop with chickpea, is decreased the chickpea yield”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Brassica napus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
intercropping · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.