Paper · 2023 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Intercropping Impact on Weed Dry Matter, Soil C and N, Sugar Quality and Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Productivity

Bassey, M. S.; Shittu, E. A.; Ngonadi, E. N.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effects of intercropping on weed dry matter, soil C and N, sugar quality and sugarcane productivity were investigated at Badeggi, Nigeria in 2016 and 2017. The results revealed that application of Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping produced lower weed dry matter comparable to Sugarcane + Soybean intercropping which significantly increased growth and yield attributes of sugarcane. Application of Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping, resulted in a comparable germination count, Tiller count, plant and stalk height to Soybean intercropping. Similarly, Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping and Soybean intercropping produced comparable stalk height and brix content. Also, Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping generated more millable canes and stools per plot. Application of Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping proved equally effective as Soybean intercropping in contributing the highest soil C and N and cane yield. In the same way, Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping and Soybean intercropping produced comparable sucrose and glucose content. Lower weed dry matter was found in Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping, and taller plant and stalks, girth, brix content, millable cane, stools, sucrose, glucose content. and cane yield were observed in Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping. In conclusion, application of Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping or Soybean intercropping effectively controlled weeds, increased Soil C and N, plant and stalk height, girth, brix content, millable cane, stools and cane yield of sugarcane.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane + groundnut intercropping produced lower weed dry matter, comparable to sugarcane + soybean intercropping.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
Sugarcane + Groundnut intercroppinge2
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
Sugarcane + Soybean intercroppinge2
Setting
Badeggi, Nigeriae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effects of intercropping on weed dry matter, soil C and N, sugar quality and sugarcane productivity were investigated at Badeggi, Nigeria in 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping produced lower weed dry matter comparable to Sugarcane + Soybean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane + soybean intercropping significantly increased growth and yield attributes of sugarcane.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
Sugarcane + Soybean intercroppinge3
Outcome
growth and yield attributese3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sugarcane + Soybean intercropping which significantly increased growth and yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane + groundnut intercropping gave germination count, tiller count, plant and stalk height comparable to soybean intercropping.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
Sugarcane + Groundnut intercroppinge4
Outcome
germination count, Tiller count, plant and stalk heighte4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
Soybean intercroppinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–122 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping, resulted in a comparable germination count, Tiller count, plant and stalk height to Soybean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane + groundnut intercropping gave brix content comparable to soybean intercropping.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
Sugarcane + Groundnut intercroppinge5
Outcome
brix contente5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Comparator
Soybean intercroppinge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–122 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping and Soybean intercropping produced comparable stalk height and brix content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane + groundnut intercropping generated more millable canes and stools per plot.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
Sugarcane + Groundnut intercroppinge6
Outcome
millable canes and stools per plote6
Direction
moree6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–122 · show in text ↑
e6

“Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping generated more millable canes and stools per plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane + groundnut intercropping gave the highest soil C and N, equally effective as soybean intercropping.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
Sugarcane + Groundnut intercroppinge7
Outcome
soil C and Ne7
Direction
higheste7
Comparator
Soybean intercroppinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–122 · show in text ↑
e7

“Application of Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping proved equally effective as Soybean intercropping in contributing the highest soil C and N and cane yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane + groundnut intercropping gave the highest cane yield, equally effective as soybean intercropping.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
Sugarcane + Groundnut intercroppinge7
Outcome
cane yielde7
Direction
higheste7
Comparator
Soybean intercroppinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–122 · show in text ↑
e7

“Application of Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping proved equally effective as Soybean intercropping in contributing the highest soil C and N and cane yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane + groundnut intercropping gave sucrose and glucose content comparable to soybean intercropping.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
Sugarcane + Groundnut intercroppinge0
Outcome
sucrose and glucose contente0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
Soybean intercroppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the same way, Sugarcane + Groundnut intercropping and Soybean intercropping produced comparable sucrose and glucose content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1048 · show in text ↑

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · weed · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

intercropping · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Intercropping reduced herbicide use by 61%.

    A 7-year multi-criteria analysis of sugarcane intercropping compared to conventional cropping systems · 2026 · compared with conventional chemical and low weed control systems

    No difference from an alternative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

intercropping · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.