Paper · 2011 · Pakistan Sugar Journal

Prospects of intercropping rabi crops in autumn planted sugarcane.

Awais Rasool; Muhammad Farooq; Muhammad Zubair; et al.

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sugarcane is a long duration crop and is suitable for intercropping with other short duration crops to maximize the farmer income from the unit area. Thus, this study was designed to find out the possibility of wheat, lentil and gram intercropping with autumn planted sugarcane crop. The study was carried out at National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad during 2004–05 cropping season. Sugarcane variety RB–72–454 was used as test crop and planted at 1.2 meter row distance in the first week of September, 2004. Two rows of each wheat, lentil and gram crop were seeded in the month of November in between cane rows. Sugarcane crop was harvested in the month of December, 2005. Lentil and gram were harvested in the month of April while, wheat in May. The results of the study indicted that sugarcane planted alone produced highest cane yield of 130.5 t ha , while sugarcane intercropped with wheat produced lowest cane yield of 105.5 t ha. The yields of wheat, lentil and gram were 1.18, 0.57 and 0.43 t ha, respectively. However, it was observed that intercropping of wheat, lentil and gram with sugarcane decreased cane yield by 19.2, 18.6 and 14.3%, respectively. The maximum economic return of Rs. 156641 ha was noticed when sugarcane was planted without intercropping, whereas, intercropping of sugarcane with wheat resulted in minimum return of Rs. 138889 ha. Findings of the study revealed that autumn planting of sugarcane without any intercropping is more profitable than intercropping with cereal and leguminous crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane alone yielded 130.5 t ha, the highest cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
130.5 t hae0

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane planted alone produced highest cane yield of 130.5 t ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with wheat yielded 105.5 t ha, the lowest cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
intercropped with wheate0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
105.5 t hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane intercropped with wheat produced lowest cane yield of 105.5 t ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–946 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat intercrop yield was 1.18 t ha.

Outcome
yieldse0
Value
1.18e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of wheat, lentil and gram were 1.18, 0.57 and 0.43 t ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil intercrop yield was 0.57 t ha.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
yieldse0
Value
0.57e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of wheat, lentil and gram were 1.18, 0.57 and 0.43 t ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gram intercrop yield was 0.43 t ha.

Taxon
grame0
Outcome
yieldse0
Value
0.43 t hae0

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of wheat, lentil and gram were 1.18, 0.57 and 0.43 t ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat intercropping decreased sugarcane yield by 19.2%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
intercropping of wheate0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
19.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of wheat, lentil and gram with sugarcane decreased cane yield by 19.2, 18.6 and 14.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil intercropping decreased sugarcane yield by 18.6%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
lentile0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
18.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of wheat, lentil and gram with sugarcane decreased cane yield by 19.2, 18.6 and 14.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gram intercropping decreased sugarcane yield by 14.3%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
grame0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
14.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of wheat, lentil and gram with sugarcane decreased cane yield by 19.2, 18.6 and 14.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1173 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane without intercropping gave maximum economic return of Rs. 156641 ha.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
economic returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs. 156641 hae0

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum economic return of Rs. 156641 ha was noticed when sugarcane was planted without intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1280 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with wheat gave minimum economic return of Rs. 138889 ha.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
returne0
Direction
minimume0
Value
Rs. 138889 hae0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of sugarcane with wheat resulted in minimum return of Rs. 138889 ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1372 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that autumn sugarcane without intercropping is more profitable.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
autumn planting of sugarcane without any intercroppinge0

Verbatim

e0

“autumn planting of sugarcane without any intercropping is more profitable than intercropping with cereal and leguminous crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1535 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Lens culinaris · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.