Paper · 2026 · Frontiers in Nutrition

First report on degradation of Alternaria toxins in apple juice by UV-C treatment

Ufuk Gokce Ayranci; Hakan Karaca

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Toxic metabolites of Alternaria spp. are considered as “emerging mycotoxins” and have not been yet regulated by legislation in many countries. Alternaria species can grow and produce these mycotoxins in various products including fruits and fruit juices. In the present study, UV-C treatment (3971.09 J m −2 , 1–8 h) was used for the first time to degrade Alternaria toxins [tenuazonic acid (TeA), alternariol (AOH) and alternariol monomethyl ether (AME)] in apple juice. The effect of the treatment on quality characteristics of apple juice was also evaluated. UV-C treatment was very effective in degrading toxins. AME was the most affected toxin (decreased by half) after a treatment for 1 h. Degradation rates of 90.52, 77.01 and 75.92% were observed in the levels of TeA, AOH and AME, respectively, at the end of treatment for 8 h. Soluble solid content, pH and titratable acidity values did not change significantly after UV-C treatment, however turbidity values increased by 92% at the end of treatment. One of the major effects of UV-C treatment was on the color of the apple juice. Transmittance value at 440 nm increased while a * and b * values decreased significantly ( p < 0.05) which shows that UV-C had a deleterious effect on color pigments of the juice. Significant decreases were observed also in phenolic content and antioxidant activity of the UV-C treated juice. These results demonstrate that UV-C is quite effective in degrading Alternaria toxins in apple juice but has detrimental effects on some quality characteristics, especially for prolonged treatment periods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C reduced AME by half after one hour.

Treatment
UV-C treatmente1
Outcome
AMEe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
halfe0
Qualifier
1 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AME was the most affected toxin (decreased by half) after a treatment for 1 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–694 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-C treatment was very effective in degrading toxins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After eight hours UV-C reduced TeA by 90.52%.

Treatment
UV-C treatmente1
Outcome
levels of TeAe0
Direction
Degradatione0
Value
90.52e0
Qualifier
8 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Degradation rates of 90.52, 77.01 and 75.92% were observed in the levels of TeA, AOH and AME, respectively, at the end of treatment for 8 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–835 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-C treatment was very effective in degrading toxins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After eight hours UV-C reduced AOH by 77.01%.

Treatment
UV-C treatmente1
Outcome
AOHe0
Direction
Degradatione0
Value
77.01e0
Qualifier
8 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Degradation rates of 90.52, 77.01 and 75.92% were observed in the levels of TeA, AOH and AME, respectively, at the end of treatment for 8 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–835 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-C treatment was very effective in degrading toxins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After eight hours UV-C reduced AME by 75.92%.

Treatment
UV-C treatmente1
Outcome
AMEe0
Direction
Degradatione0
Value
75.92%e0
Qualifier
8 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Degradation rates of 90.52, 77.01 and 75.92% were observed in the levels of TeA, AOH and AME, respectively, at the end of treatment for 8 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–835 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-C treatment was very effective in degrading toxins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C did not significantly change soluble solids, pH or titratable acidity.

Treatment
UV-C treatmente0
Outcome
Soluble solid content, pH and titratable acidity valuese0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soluble solid content, pH and titratable acidity values did not change significantly after UV-C treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C increased turbidity by 92% at treatment end.

Treatment
UV-C treatmente1
Outcome
turbidity valuese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
92%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“turbidity values increased by 92% at the end of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-C treatment was very effective in degrading toxins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C increased transmittance at 440 nm.

Treatment
UV-C treatmente1
Outcome
Transmittance value at 440 nme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transmittance value at 440 nm increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1130 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-C treatment was very effective in degrading toxins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C significantly decreased a* and b* color values.

Treatment
UV-C treatmente1
Outcome
a * and b * valuese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a * and b * values decreased significantly ( p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1191 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-C treatment was very effective in degrading toxins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C significantly decreased phenolic content and antioxidant activity.

Treatment
UV-Ce0
Outcome
phenolic content and antioxidant activitye0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant decreases were observed also in phenolic content and antioxidant activity of the UV-C treated juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑

uv · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

uv · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

uv · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.