Paper · 2007 · Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B

Retention and rainfastness of mancozeb as affected by physicochemical characteristics of adaxial apple leaf surface after enhanced UV-B radiation

Katja Bringe; Mauricio Hunsche; Michaela Schmitz-Eiberger; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

It is not clear so far whether alteration of leaf micromorphology and surface wax chemistry due to the impact of environmental factors, such as UV-B radiation, affects retention and rainfastness of applied pesticide solutions. In this study; UV-B treated and untreated adaxial leaf surfaces of apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.) were characterized in terms of chemical composition, micromorphological fine structure, hydrophobicity, and wettability. Furthermore, the retention and rainfastness of applied fungicide mancozeb were studied. The samples were examined 0, 24 and 48 h after ultraviolet (UV)-B radiation (0.022 kW m(-2) for 150 min) The total wax mass, recovered from the adaxial leaf surface, amounted from 0.38 microg cm(-2) (control) up to 0.49 microg cm(-2) (24 h). Chemical composition of surface wax altered, whereas the contact angle of applied water droplets on leaf surface of UV-B treated plants did not change significantly compared to the control. The alteration of surface wax quantity and quality significantly affected retention of a.i.; it increased at a sampling time of 24 h after UV-B irradiation, whereas rainfastness of the fungicide spray solution was not significantly influenced.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B treatment raised the total wax mass on the adaxial apple leaf surface from 0.38 microg cm(-2) in the control to up to 0.49 microg cm(-2) at 24 h.

Taxon
apple seedlingsMalus domesticae1
Organ / stage
adaxial leaf surfacee0
Treatment
UV-Be1
Outcome
total wax masse0
Direction
up toe0
Value
0.49 microg cm(-2)e0
Qualifier
0.38 microg cm(-2)e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total wax mass, recovered from the adaxial leaf surface, amounted from 0.38 microg cm(-2) (control) up to 0.49 microg cm(-2) (24 h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-B treated and untreated adaxial leaf surfaces of apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The chemical composition of the surface wax of apple leaves was altered by UV-B.

Taxon
apple seedlingsMalus domesticae1
Treatment
UV-Be0
Outcome
Chemical composition of surface waxe0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical composition of surface wax altered, whereas the contact angle of applied water droplets on leaf surface of UV-B treated plants did not change significantly compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–974 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-B treated and untreated adaxial leaf surfaces of apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The contact angle of water droplets on the leaf surface of UV-B treated apple plants did not change significantly compared with the control.

Taxon
apple seedlingsMalus domesticae1
Treatment
UV-Be0
Outcome
contact angle of applied water dropletse0
Direction
did not changee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical composition of surface wax altered, whereas the contact angle of applied water droplets on leaf surface of UV-B treated plants did not change significantly compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–974 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-B treated and untreated adaxial leaf surfaces of apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Retention of the fungicide active ingredient on apple leaves significantly increased 24 h after UV-B irradiation.

Taxon
apple seedlingsMalus domesticae1
Treatment
UV-B irradiatione0
Outcome
retention of a.i.e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
24 he0
Comparator
untreatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“retention of a.i.; it increased at a sampling time of 24 h after UV-B irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1131 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-B treated and untreated adaxial leaf surfaces of apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfastness of the fungicide spray solution on apple leaves was not significantly influenced by UV-B irradiation.

Taxon
apple seedlingsMalus domesticae1
Treatment
UV-B irradiatione0
Outcome
rainfastness of the fungicide spray solutione0
Direction
not significantly influencede0
Comparator
untreatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“24 h after UV-B irradiation, whereas rainfastness of the fungicide spray solution was not significantly influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1218 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-B treated and untreated adaxial leaf surfaces of apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–309 · show in text ↑

uv · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.