Paper · 2025 · AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)

Effect of the harvest date, calcium and other chemicals on the quality and storability of ‘Golden Smoothie’ apples

Rios-Velasco, Claudio; Ornelas-Paz, José J.; Ruíz-Cisneros, María F.; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Objective: Apples cultivated in Mexico generally are smaller and softer than those produced in other geographical latitudes considered as optimal for apple production. The aim of this evaluation was determine the effect of applications with calcium, nitrogen, potassium, magnesium, sulfur and naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), as well as the harvest date on the quality of apple fruits. Methodology: ‘Golden Smoothie’ apple trees were treated foliarly with CaCl2 with and without NAA, and with a mixture of N, K, Mg and S or gypsum applied to soil for two years. Apples were harvested at 141 (regular harvest date), 161 (mid-late harvest) and 171 days (late harvest) after full bloom (DAFB) and evaluated for quality at harvest time and during their storage at 0 °C for up to 179 days. Results: Foliar applications of CaCl2 significantly increased the calcium content in fruit and leaves, but fruit quality, including firmness, was not inf luenced. Fertilization of soil with the mixture of nutrients, including CaSO4, did not inf luence the fruit quality. Lately harvested fruit was 14.9% heavier but 17.1% softer than fruit picked at the commercial harvest date. Delaying of fruit harvest reduced about 43 d the storability of fruit. Based in these results, the relative softness of apples grown in Mexico is not related with its calcium content, hence unlikely to be overcome with the application of this mineral. Conclusions: Even in the control fruits, both seasons, the stored fruits do not show some physiological disorder as bitter pit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar CaCl2 applications increased calcium content in apple fruit and leaves.

Organ / stage
fruit and leavese1
Treatment
Foliar applications of CaCl2e1
Outcome
calcium contente1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Foliar applications of CaCl2 significantly increased the calcium content in fruit and leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–883 · show in text ↑
e2

“‘Golden Smoothie’ apple trees were treated foliarly with CaCl2 with and without NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar CaCl2 applications did not influence apple fruit quality, including firmness.

Treatment
Foliar applications of CaCl2e1
Outcome
fruit quality, including firmnesse3
Direction
not inf luencede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Foliar applications of CaCl2 significantly increased the calcium content in fruit and leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–883 · show in text ↑
e2

“‘Golden Smoothie’ apple trees were treated foliarly with CaCl2 with and without NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–479 · show in text ↑
e3

“fruit quality, including firmness, was not inf luenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fertilization with a nutrient mixture including CaSO4 did not influence apple fruit quality.

Treatment
Fertilization of soil with the mixture of nutrients, including CaSO4e4
Outcome
fruit qualitye4
Direction
did not inf luencee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“‘Golden Smoothie’ apple trees were treated foliarly with CaCl2 with and without NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–479 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fertilization of soil with the mixture of nutrients, including CaSO4, did not inf luence the fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-harvested apple fruit was 14.9% heavier than fruit picked at the commercial harvest date.

Treatment
Lately harvestede5
Outcome
heaviere5
Direction
heaviere5
Value
14.9%e5
Comparator
fruit picked at the commercial harvest datee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“‘Golden Smoothie’ apple trees were treated foliarly with CaCl2 with and without NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–479 · show in text ↑
e5

“Lately harvested fruit was 14.9% heavier but 17.1% softer than fruit picked at the commercial harvest date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-harvested apple fruit was 17.1% softer than fruit picked at the commercial harvest date.

Treatment
Lately harvestede5
Outcome
softere5
Direction
softere5
Value
17.1%e5
Comparator
fruit picked at the commercial harvest datee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“‘Golden Smoothie’ apple trees were treated foliarly with CaCl2 with and without NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–479 · show in text ↑
e5

“Lately harvested fruit was 14.9% heavier but 17.1% softer than fruit picked at the commercial harvest date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying apple fruit harvest reduced fruit storability by about 43 days.

Treatment
Delaying of fruit harveste7
Outcome
storability of fruite7
Direction
reducede7
Value
about 43 de7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“‘Golden Smoothie’ apple trees were treated foliarly with CaCl2 with and without NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–479 · show in text ↑
e7

“Delaying of fruit harvest reduced about 43 d the storability of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1230 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative softness of apples grown in Mexico is not related to their calcium content.

Compound
calciume6
Outcome
relative softnesse6
Setting
Mexicoe6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“the relative softness of apples grown in Mexico is not related with its calcium content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1343 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stored control apple fruits showed no physiological disorder such as bitter pit.

Outcome
physiological disorder as bitter pite6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“‘Golden Smoothie’ apple trees were treated foliarly with CaCl2 with and without NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–479 · show in text ↑
e6

“the stored fruits do not show some physiological disorder as bitter pit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1539 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

47 papers: 41 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 25 positive, 7 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

calcium sulfate · quality: grain · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 10 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 58 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 100 positive, 16 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.