Paper · 1994 · PubMed

Influence of Rhizoctonia solani on Egg Hatching and Infectivity of Rotylenchulus reniformis.

A Sankaralingam; E C McGawley

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of culture filtrates of Rhizoctonia solani and root exudates of R. solani-infected cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) seedlings on hatching of eggs and infectivity of females of Rotylenchulus reniformis were evaluated in an attempt to account for the enhanced nematode reproduction observed in the presence of this fungus. Crude filtrates of R. solani cultures growing over sterile, deionized distilled water did not affect egg hatching. Exudates from roots of cotton seedlings increased hatching of R. reniformis eggs over that observed in water controls. Exudates from cotton seedling roots not infected or infected with R. solani did not differ in their effect on egg hatching. However, infection of cotton seedlings by reniform females was increased in the presence of R. solani, resulting in the augmented egg production and juvenile population densities in soil observed in greenhouse studies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia solani culture filtrate did not affect nematode egg hatching.

Treatment
Crude filtrates of R. solani culturese0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
egg hatchinge0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crude filtrates of R. solani cultures growing over sterile, deionized distilled water did not affect egg hatching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–442 · show in text ↑
t0

“R. solani-infected cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton root exudates increased reniform nematode egg hatching compared with water.

Treatment
Exudates from roots of cotton seedlingse0
Interactor
R. reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise0pathogen
Outcome
hatching of R. reniformis eggse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
water controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exudates from roots of cotton seedlings increased hatching of R. reniformis eggs over that observed in water controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal infection of cotton roots did not change the exudate effect on nematode egg hatching.

Treatment
infected with R. solanie0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
egg hatchinge0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
not infectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exudates from cotton seedling roots not infected or infected with R. solani did not differ in their effect on egg hatching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia solani increased cotton seedling infection by reniform nematode females.

Treatment
presence of R. solanie0
Interactor
reniform femalese0pathogen
Second interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
infection of cotton seedlings by reniform femalese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Second interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infection of cotton seedlings by reniform females was increased in the presence of R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungal presence augmented nematode egg production and juvenile soil population densities.

Treatment
R. solanie0
Interactor
reniform femalese0pathogen
Second interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
egg production and juvenile population densities in soile0
Direction
augmentede0
Setting
greenhouse studiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Second interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, infection of cotton seedlings by reniform females was increased in the presence of R. solani, resulting in the augmented egg production and juvenile population densities in soil observed in greenhouse studies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–904 · show in text ↑

Rhizoctonia solani · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Rhizoctonia solani · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

infection · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.