Abstract
This study was conducted on the lentil cultivar Malazgirt 89 during 1999 and 2000 to determine the most appropriate method for controlling weeds. In the experiments, hand hoeing, trifluralin, imazethapyr, linuron, prometryn, phenmedipham + desmediphame, trifluralin + hand hoeing and linuron + hand hoeing which should be used as an alternative to hand weeding, were tested. The effects of herbicides on nodulation in lentils were also investigated. Centaurea depressa in the first year, and Ranunculus arvensis and Acroptilon repens in the second year were the dominant weed species encountered in the plots. A combination of linuron + hand hoeing, linuron alone and hand hoeing were the most effective methods for weed control. Trifluralin, imazethapyr and phenmedipham + desmedipham showed phytotoxic effects on lentils. None of the herbicides and methods used in the investigation had any adverse effects on nodulation, and Rhizobium leguminosarum inoculation was not found to have any effect on the competitive ability of weeds in lentils.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Centaurea depressa was the dominant weed in year one.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Interactor
- Centaurea depressa
Centaurea depressae0weed - Outcome
- Centaurea depressa in the first yeare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Centaurea depressa in the first year”
t0“Spring Lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
Ranunculus arvensis and Acroptilon repens dominated in year two.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Interactor
- Ranunculus arvensis
Ranunculus arvensise0weed - Second interactor
- Acroptilon repens
Leuzea repense0weed - Outcome
- dominant weed speciese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ranunculus arvensis and Acroptilon repens in the second year were the dominant weed species”
t0“Spring Lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
Linuron plus hand hoeing was among the most effective weed-control methods.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- linuron + hand hoeinge0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A combination of linuron + hand hoeing, linuron alone and hand hoeing were the most effective methods for weed control”
t0“Spring Lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
Linuron alone was among the most effective weed-control methods.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- linuron alonee0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“linuron alone and hand hoeing were the most effective methods for weed control”
t0“Spring Lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand hoeing was among the most effective weed-control methods.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- hand hoeinge0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“hand hoeing were the most effective methods for weed control”
t0“Spring Lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
Trifluralin was phytotoxic to lentils.
- Taxon
- lentilsLens culinarise0
- Treatment
- Trifluraline0
- Outcome
- phytotoxic effectse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Trifluralin, imazethapyr and phenmedipham + desmedipham showed phytotoxic effects on lentils”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr was phytotoxic to lentils.
- Taxon
- lentilsLens culinarise0
- Treatment
- imazethapyre0
- Outcome
- phytotoxic effectse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“imazethapyr and phenmedipham + desmedipham showed phytotoxic effects on lentils”
Claim · model-written summary
Phenmedipham plus desmedipham was phytotoxic to lentils.
- Taxon
- lentilsLens culinarise0
- Treatment
- phenmedipham + desmediphame0
- Outcome
- phytotoxic effectse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“phenmedipham + desmedipham showed phytotoxic effects on lentils”
Claim · model-written summary
No tested herbicide or method adversely affected lentil nodulation.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- herbicides and methods used in the investigatione0
- Outcome
- nodulatione0
- Direction
- Nonee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“None of the herbicides and methods used in the investigation had any adverse effects on nodulation”
t0“Spring Lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium leguminosarum inoculation did not affect weed competitive ability in lentils.
- Taxon
- lentilsLens culinarise0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium leguminosarum inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont - Outcome
- competitive ability of weedse0
- Direction
- not found to have any effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rhizobium leguminosarum inoculation was not found to have any effect on the competitive ability of weeds in lentils”
The same questions in other papers
linuron · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
Imazethapyr · crop injury · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →trifluralin · crop injury · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
herbicide · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.