Paper · 2005 · New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Weed control in lentil ( Lens culinaris ) in eastern Turkey

Erdal Elkoca; Faik Kantar; Huseyin Zengin

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated the effect of 12 herbicide applications and hand weeding (once, twice, and repeated) in comparison with a weedy control on seed and total crop biomass yield of lentil ( Lens culinaris ) in 2000 and 2001 under the dry conditions of Erzurum (29°55'N and 41° 16'E at an altitude of 1850 m), Turkey. In both growing seasons, data were collected on the density and dry weight of weed species, density of lentil, seed yield, total crop biomass yield, and harvest index. Weed control applications significantly decreased density and dry weight of weeds and increased total crop biomass and seed yields by 49.2% (linuron plus prometryn) and 74.9% (prometryn plus fluazifop‐p‐butyl), compared with the unweeded control. Pre‐emergence plus post‐emergence combinations, however, gave no clear advantages over single applications of linuron, prometryn, and metribuzin. Metribuzin reduced plant density in wetter conditions of the second year. In conclusion, linuron and prometryn alone were effective in controlling weeds on lentils without apparent toxic effects. Hand weeding once was equally effective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control decreased weed density and dry weight.

Treatment
Weed control applicationse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
density and dry weight of weedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control applications significantly decreased density and dry weight of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron plus prometryn increased total crop biomass yield by 49.2% over the unweeded control.

Treatment
linuron plus prometryne0
Outcome
total crop biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
49.2%e0
Comparator
unweeded controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“increased total crop biomass and seed yields by 49.2% (linuron plus prometryn) and 74.9% (prometryn plus fluazifop‐p‐butyl), compared with the unweeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometryn plus fluazifop-p-butyl increased lentil seed yield by 74.9% over the unweeded control.

Treatment
prometryn plus fluazifop‐p‐butyle0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
74.9%e0
Comparator
unweeded controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“increased total crop biomass and seed yields by 49.2% (linuron plus prometryn) and 74.9% (prometryn plus fluazifop‐p‐butyl), compared with the unweeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined pre- and post-emergence applications had no clear advantage over single herbicide applications.

Treatment
Pre‐emergence plus post‐emergence combinationse0
Outcome
no clear advantagese0
Direction
no clear advantagese0
Comparator
single applications of linuron, prometryn, and metribuzine0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Pre‐emergence plus post‐emergence combinations, however, gave no clear advantages over single applications of linuron, prometryn, and metribuzin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin reduced lentil plant density in the wetter second year.

Treatment
Metribuzine0
Outcome
plant densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
wetter conditions of the second yeare0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Metribuzin reduced plant density in wetter conditions of the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron alone controlled weeds in lentil without apparent toxic effects.

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
linurone0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlling weedse0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“linuron and prometryn alone were effective in controlling weeds on lentils without apparent toxic effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometryn alone controlled weeds in lentil without apparent toxic effects.

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
prometryne0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlling weedse0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“linuron and prometryn alone were effective in controlling weeds on lentils without apparent toxic effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One hand weeding was equally effective.

Treatment
Hand weeding oncee0
Outcome
equally effectivee0
Direction
equally effectivee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding once was equally effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1125 · show in text ↑

linuron · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

prometryn · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

prometryn · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.