Abstract
Abstract Several experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of time, concentration, and number of GA 4+7 applications on ‘McIntosh’, ‘Early McIntosh’, and ‘Empire’ apples ( Malus domestica Borkh.). GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1 increased fruit set and inhibited flower bud formation on ‘McIntosh’ and ‘Early McIntosh’. Flower bud formation was inhibited on ‘McIntosh’ when GA 4+7 was applied over a wide range of times from 6 days before full bloom to 34 to 35 days after full bloom. Applications made 45 and 60 days after full bloom had no effect. Following storage, ‘Empire’ fruit treated with GA 4+7 were softer and had a higher incidence of senescent breakdown than controls. Postbloom sprays of GA 4+7 increased fruit set on ‘Empire’ one year when applied from 0 to 150 mg·liter −1 , while two applications of 50 mg·liter −1 on similar trees in another year caused thinning. GA 4+7 sprays appeared to advance ripening of ‘Empire’ apples. Gibberellin sprays reduced seed number. GA 4+7 inhibited flowering in ‘Empire’. Repeat applications 19 and 34 days after full bloom were only slightly more inhibitory to flowering than one application of 0, 50, 100, or 150 mg·liter −1 made 10 days after full bloom.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
GA 4+7 at 150 mg per liter increased McIntosh fruit set.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- ‘McIntosh’e0
- Treatment
- GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1e0
- Outcome
- fruit sete0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1 increased fruit set and inhibited flower bud formation on ‘McIntosh’ and ‘Early McIntosh’.”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
GA 4+7 at 150 mg per liter increased Early McIntosh fruit set.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- ‘Early McIntosh’e0
- Treatment
- GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1e0
- Outcome
- fruit sete0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1 increased fruit set and inhibited flower bud formation on ‘McIntosh’ and ‘Early McIntosh’.”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
GA 4+7 inhibited McIntosh flower bud formation.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- ‘McIntosh’e0
- Treatment
- GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1e0
- Outcome
- flower bud formatione0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1 increased fruit set and inhibited flower bud formation on ‘McIntosh’ and ‘Early McIntosh’.”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
GA 4+7 inhibited Early McIntosh flower bud formation.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- ‘Early McIntosh’e0
- Treatment
- GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1e0
- Outcome
- flower bud formatione0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1 increased fruit set and inhibited flower bud formation on ‘McIntosh’ and ‘Early McIntosh’.”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
McIntosh flower bud formation was inhibited by applications from 6 days before to 34–35 days after bloom.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- ‘McIntosh’e0
- Treatment
- GA 4+7e0
- Outcome
- Flower bud formatione0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
- Qualifier
- from 6 days before full bloom to 34 to 35 days after full bloome0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Flower bud formation was inhibited on ‘McIntosh’ when GA 4+7 was applied over a wide range of times from 6 days before full bloom to 34 to 35 days after full bloom.”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Applications 45 and 60 days after full bloom had no effect on flower bud formation.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- Applications made 45 and 60 days after full bloome0
- Outcome
- no effecte0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Applications made 45 and 60 days after full bloom had no effect.”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Stored Empire fruit treated with GA 4+7 were softer than controls.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- ‘Empire’e0
- Treatment
- GA 4+7e0
- Outcome
- softere0
- Direction
- softere0
- Comparator
- controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Following storage, ‘Empire’ fruit treated with GA 4+7 were softer and had a higher incidence of senescent breakdown than controls.”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Stored Empire fruit treated with GA 4+7 had more senescent breakdown than controls.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- ‘Empire’e0
- Treatment
- GA 4+7e0
- Outcome
- incidence of senescent breakdowne0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Following storage, ‘Empire’ fruit treated with GA 4+7 were softer and had a higher incidence of senescent breakdown than controls.”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Postbloom GA 4+7 sprays increased Empire fruit set in one year.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- ‘Empire’e0
- Treatment
- Postbloom sprays of GA 4+7e0
- Outcome
- fruit sete0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- one year when applied from 0 to 150 mg·liter −1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Postbloom sprays of GA 4+7 increased fruit set on ‘Empire’ one year when applied from 0 to 150 mg·liter −1”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Two 50 mg per liter applications caused thinning in another year.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- two applications of 50 mg·liter −1e0
- Outcome
- thinninge0
- Qualifier
- another yeare0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“two applications of 50 mg·liter −1 on similar trees in another year caused thinning.”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
GA 4+7 sprays appeared to advance Empire ripening.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- ‘Empire’e0
- Treatment
- GA 4+7 sprayse0
- Outcome
- ripeninge0
- Direction
- advancee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“GA 4+7 sprays appeared to advance ripening of ‘Empire’ apples.”
Claim · model-written summary
Gibberellin sprays reduced apple seed number.
- Taxon
- Apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- Gibberellin sprayse0
- Outcome
- seed numbere0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Gibberellin sprays reduced seed number.”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
GA 4+7 inhibited flowering in Empire.
- Taxon
- Apples
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- ‘Empire’e0
- Treatment
- GA 4+7e0
- Outcome
- floweringe0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“GA 4+7 inhibited flowering in ‘Empire’.”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Two later applications were only slightly more inhibitory to flowering than a single earlier application.
- Taxon
- Apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- Repeat applications 19 and 34 days after full bloome0
- Outcome
- floweringe0
- Direction
- more inhibitorye0
- Comparator
- one application of 0, 50, 100, or 150 mg·liter −1 made 10 days after full bloome0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Repeat applications 19 and 34 days after full bloom were only slightly more inhibitory to flowering than one application of 0, 50, 100, or 150 mg·liter −1 made 10 days after full bloom.”
t0“Apples”
The same questions in other papers
Gibberellic acid · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
Gibberellic acid · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Gibberellic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →application · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
70 papers more in this group
See all 74 papers →application · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
137 papers more in this group
See all 141 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.