Paper · 1989 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Gibberellins A4+7 Influence Fruit Set, Fruit Quality, and Return Bloom of Apples

Duane W. Greene

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
13
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Several experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of time, concentration, and number of GA 4+7 applications on ‘McIntosh’, ‘Early McIntosh’, and ‘Empire’ apples ( Malus domestica Borkh.). GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1 increased fruit set and inhibited flower bud formation on ‘McIntosh’ and ‘Early McIntosh’. Flower bud formation was inhibited on ‘McIntosh’ when GA 4+7 was applied over a wide range of times from 6 days before full bloom to 34 to 35 days after full bloom. Applications made 45 and 60 days after full bloom had no effect. Following storage, ‘Empire’ fruit treated with GA 4+7 were softer and had a higher incidence of senescent breakdown than controls. Postbloom sprays of GA 4+7 increased fruit set on ‘Empire’ one year when applied from 0 to 150 mg·liter −1 , while two applications of 50 mg·liter −1 on similar trees in another year caused thinning. GA 4+7 sprays appeared to advance ripening of ‘Empire’ apples. Gibberellin sprays reduced seed number. GA 4+7 inhibited flowering in ‘Empire’. Repeat applications 19 and 34 days after full bloom were only slightly more inhibitory to flowering than one application of 0, 50, 100, or 150 mg·liter −1 made 10 days after full bloom.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA 4+7 at 150 mg per liter increased McIntosh fruit set.

Material
‘McIntosh’e0
Treatment
GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1e0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1 increased fruit set and inhibited flower bud formation on ‘McIntosh’ and ‘Early McIntosh’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA 4+7 at 150 mg per liter increased Early McIntosh fruit set.

Material
‘Early McIntosh’e0
Treatment
GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1e0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1 increased fruit set and inhibited flower bud formation on ‘McIntosh’ and ‘Early McIntosh’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA 4+7 inhibited McIntosh flower bud formation.

Material
‘McIntosh’e0
Treatment
GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1e0
Outcome
flower bud formatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1 increased fruit set and inhibited flower bud formation on ‘McIntosh’ and ‘Early McIntosh’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA 4+7 inhibited Early McIntosh flower bud formation.

Material
‘Early McIntosh’e0
Treatment
GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1e0
Outcome
flower bud formatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA 4+7 at 150 mg·liter −1 increased fruit set and inhibited flower bud formation on ‘McIntosh’ and ‘Early McIntosh’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

McIntosh flower bud formation was inhibited by applications from 6 days before to 34–35 days after bloom.

Material
‘McIntosh’e0
Treatment
GA 4+7e0
Outcome
Flower bud formatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
from 6 days before full bloom to 34 to 35 days after full bloome0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower bud formation was inhibited on ‘McIntosh’ when GA 4+7 was applied over a wide range of times from 6 days before full bloom to 34 to 35 days after full bloom.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–489 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applications 45 and 60 days after full bloom had no effect on flower bud formation.

Treatment
Applications made 45 and 60 days after full bloome0
Outcome
no effecte0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications made 45 and 60 days after full bloom had no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stored Empire fruit treated with GA 4+7 were softer than controls.

Material
‘Empire’e0
Treatment
GA 4+7e0
Outcome
softere0
Direction
softere0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Following storage, ‘Empire’ fruit treated with GA 4+7 were softer and had a higher incidence of senescent breakdown than controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stored Empire fruit treated with GA 4+7 had more senescent breakdown than controls.

Material
‘Empire’e0
Treatment
GA 4+7e0
Outcome
incidence of senescent breakdowne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Following storage, ‘Empire’ fruit treated with GA 4+7 were softer and had a higher incidence of senescent breakdown than controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postbloom GA 4+7 sprays increased Empire fruit set in one year.

Material
‘Empire’e0
Treatment
Postbloom sprays of GA 4+7e0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
one year when applied from 0 to 150 mg·liter −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postbloom sprays of GA 4+7 increased fruit set on ‘Empire’ one year when applied from 0 to 150 mg·liter −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two 50 mg per liter applications caused thinning in another year.

Treatment
two applications of 50 mg·liter −1e0
Outcome
thinninge0
Qualifier
another yeare0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two applications of 50 mg·liter −1 on similar trees in another year caused thinning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA 4+7 sprays appeared to advance Empire ripening.

Material
‘Empire’e0
Treatment
GA 4+7 sprayse0
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
advancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA 4+7 sprays appeared to advance ripening of ‘Empire’ apples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellin sprays reduced apple seed number.

Treatment
Gibberellin sprayse0
Outcome
seed numbere0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gibberellin sprays reduced seed number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA 4+7 inhibited flowering in Empire.

Material
‘Empire’e0
Treatment
GA 4+7e0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA 4+7 inhibited flowering in ‘Empire’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two later applications were only slightly more inhibitory to flowering than a single earlier application.

Treatment
Repeat applications 19 and 34 days after full bloome0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
more inhibitorye0
Comparator
one application of 0, 50, 100, or 150 mg·liter −1 made 10 days after full bloome0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Repeat applications 19 and 34 days after full bloom were only slightly more inhibitory to flowering than one application of 0, 50, 100, or 150 mg·liter −1 made 10 days after full bloom.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Gibberellic acid · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 16 positive, 11 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 58 positive, 16 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

application · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 107 positive, 34 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.