Paper · 1997 · Biologia Plantarum

Growth and photosynthesis of Lycopersicon esculentum (L.) plants as affected by nitrogen deficiency

L. Guidi; G. Lorefice; A. Pardossi; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
63
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Fully expanded leaves of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) growing with either complete or nitrogen-deficient nutrient solution were analysed for leaf water status, gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence during the vegetative and reproductive phases. N-deficiency did not affect leaf water relations but did decrease light saturated photosynthetic rate as well as stomatal conductance in the vegetative stage. A lower variable to maximum fluorescence ratio (Fv/Fm) was found in N-limited plants which also showed an increase in leaf starch content and in starch to sucrose ratio. The inhibition of photosynthesis and the alteration of photosynthates partitioning were responsible for the growth reduction in N-stressed plants. During the reproductive phase the limitation of photosynthesis may be due to a large accumulation of starch which determines both a decrease in the carbon demand from the sinks and a decrease in CO2 conductance in the mesophyll.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen deficiency did not affect leaf water relations.

Treatment
N-deficiencye0
Outcome
leaf water relationse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N-deficiency did not affect leaf water relations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–301 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen deficiency reduced light saturated photosynthetic rate in the vegetative stage.

Organ / stage
vegetative stagee0
Treatment
N-deficiencye0
Outcome
light saturated photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N-deficiency did not affect leaf water relations but did decrease light saturated photosynthetic rate as well as stomatal conductance in the vegetative stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen deficiency reduced stomatal conductance in the vegetative stage.

Organ / stage
vegetative stagee0
Treatment
N-deficiencye1
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease light saturated photosynthetic rate as well as stomatal conductance in the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–410 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“N-deficiency did not affect leaf water relations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-limited plants had lower Fv/Fm.

Treatment
N-limitede0
Outcome
variable to maximum fluorescence ratio (Fv/Fm)e0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lower variable to maximum fluorescence ratio (Fv/Fm) was found in N-limited plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-limited plants had increased leaf starch content and starch-to-sucrose ratio.

Treatment
N-limitede0
Outcome
leaf starch content and in starch to sucrose ratioe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N-limited plants which also showed an increase in leaf starch content and in starch to sucrose ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis inhibition and altered photosynthate partitioning contributed to growth reduction.

Outcome
growth reductione0
Qualifier
inhibition of photosynthesis and the alteration of photosynthates partitioninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition of photosynthesis and the alteration of photosynthates partitioning were responsible for the growth reduction in N-stressed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During reproduction, starch accumulation may limit photosynthesis through reduced sink carbon demand and mesophyll CO2 conductance.

Organ / stage
reproductive phasee0
Outcome
limitation of photosynthesise0
Qualifier
large accumulation of starche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the reproductive phase the limitation of photosynthesis may be due to a large accumulation of starch which determines both a decrease in the carbon demand from the sinks and a decrease in CO2 conductance in the mesophyll.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.