Paper · 2025 · Industrial Crops and Products

Characterization of pulp and paper produced using rapid alkaline hydrogen peroxide pulping of Miscanthus × giganteus for paper mulch

Akihiro Hideno; Maiko Ohta; Toshihiko Yamada

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Agricultural plastic mulch sheets are generally composed of petroleum-derived polyethylene (PE). However, biodegradable plastics and paper materials have attracted significant attention because of concerns regarding plastic pollution and the need for decarbonization. Miscanthus × giganteus (M×G) is a promising nonwoody biomass material with high yield potential and sustainability. This study investigated the feasibility of producing paper mulch from M×G using alkaline hydrogen peroxide (AHP) pulping, a method that does not require heating or pressurization, and evaluated the fundamental properties of the resulting sheets as alternatives to plastic. Short-term AHP pulping and laboratory-scale soda pulping were applied to M×G, and specimen sheets were prepared from both pulps. A light-yellow pulp was obtained after short-term AHP pulping for 10–15 min, with a yield of approximately 59 %. Both types of pulp produced sheets with sufficient tensile and burst strengths for use as paper mulch. The specific tensile strength was greater for AHP M×G paper (dry basis weight 60 g/m 2 ; 42.8 N·m/g) soda pulp M×G paper (40.7 N·m/g). Both specimens exhibited high air permeability, suggesting a potential heat-shielding effect. The paper mulch sheets promoted better lettuce plant growth than conventional PE mulch and the control without mulch. The dry weight of lettuce was 5.3 and 1.7 times higher when grown on AHP M×G mulch sheets than on PE mulch sheets or without mulch, respectively. This study demonstrated the potential of AHP M×G sheets as an effective, sustainable alternative to conventional PE agricultural mulch.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce dry weight on AHP M×G mulch was 5.3 times that on PE mulch.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
AHP M×G mulch sheetse0
Outcome
dry weight of lettucee0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.3e0
Comparator
PE mulch sheetse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry weight of lettuce was 5.3 and 1.7 times higher when grown on AHP M×G mulch sheets than on PE mulch sheets or without mulch, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce dry weight on AHP M×G mulch was 1.7 times that without mulch.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
AHP M×G mulch sheetse0
Outcome
dry weight of lettucee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.7e0
Comparator
without mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry weight of lettuce was 5.3 and 1.7 times higher when grown on AHP M×G mulch sheets than on PE mulch sheets or without mulch, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1494 · show in text ↑

hydrogen peroxide · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

alkalinity · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mulching · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 13 positive, 8 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.