Paper · 2025 · Agricultural Water Management

Irrigation strategies for upland rice cultivars in Brazil: Physiological responses and agronomic performance

Carlos Alberto Quiloango-Chimarro; Rubens Duarte Coelho; Alice da Silva Gundim; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Irrigation strategies are essential for enhancing water productivity, thereby contributing to the sustainable water management in upland rice ( Oryza sativa L.). This study aimed to quantify the effects of various irrigation strategies on the physiology, yield, and irrigation water productivity of three upland rice cultivars. Two shelter experiments (A and B) were conducted using two factors: irrigation managements and cultivars. In Experiment A, three irrigation levels were applied: 100 % (Control), 70 % and 40 % of the irrigation applied in the control. In Experiment B, irrigation was triggered at soil water potential thresholds of −20 and −40 kPa. The cultivars used in both experiments were BRS A501 CL, BRS Esmeralda, and BRS A502. In Experiment A, the Control treatment (100 %) demanded ∼786 mm of water, which yielded 7.9 Mg ha −1 , corresponding to an irrigation water productivity of 0.88 kg m −3 . Irrigation levels of 70 % (579 mm) and 40 % (371 mm) caused yield reductions of 51–96 % and irrigation water productivity declines of 32–92 %. In Experiment B, the treatment of −20 kPa (683 mm) yielded 6.8 Mg ha −1 and 1.0 kg m −3 of irrigation water productivity. The irrigation threshold of −40 kPa (∼590 mm applied) resulted in an average grain yield of 5.3 Mg ha −1 and irrigation water productivity of 0.89 kg m −3 . Overall, although drought-tolerant cultivars were used, water-saving treatments in Experiment A (70 and 40 %) were not suitable for upland rice. In contrast, the −40 kPa irrigation threshold in Experiment B reduced water use while maintaining irrigation water productivity, representing an effective strategy for water-limited environments. Future work should explore irrigation strategies based on Experiment B, targeting specific growth stages. • Irrigation levels and irrigation at different soil water potential thresholds were tested. • Cultivars BRS Esmeralda and BRS A502 showed contrasting gas exchange performance at anthesis among experiments. • Irrigation levels of 70 % and 40 % reduced both grain yield and irrigation water productivity. • Irrigation at −20 and −40 kPa thresholds maintained comparable irrigation water productivity. • Grain yield under irrigation at –40 kPa was 22 % lower than under –20 kPa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Experiment A the full irrigation control demanded about 786 mm of water.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
Control treatment (100 %)e0
Outcome
demandede0
Value
∼786 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“In Experiment A, the Control treatment (100 %) demanded ∼786 mm of water, which yielded 7.9 Mg ha −1 , corresponding to an irrigation water productivity of 0.88 kg m −3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–913 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Experiment A the full irrigation control yielded 7.9 Mg ha-1.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
Control treatment (100 %)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
7.9 Mg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“In Experiment A, the Control treatment (100 %) demanded ∼786 mm of water, which yielded 7.9 Mg ha −1 , corresponding to an irrigation water productivity of 0.88 kg m −3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–913 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Experiment A the full irrigation control had an irrigation water productivity of 0.88 kg m-3.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
Control treatment (100 %)e0
Outcome
irrigation water productivitye0
Value
0.88 kg m −3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“In Experiment A, the Control treatment (100 %) demanded ∼786 mm of water, which yielded 7.9 Mg ha −1 , corresponding to an irrigation water productivity of 0.88 kg m −3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 70% and 40% of the control reduced upland rice yield by 51-96%.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
Irrigation levels of 70 % (579 mm) and 40 % (371 mm)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
51–96 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation levels of 70 % (579 mm) and 40 % (371 mm) caused yield reductions of 51–96 % and irrigation water productivity declines of 32–92 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 70% and 40% of the control reduced irrigation water productivity by 32-92%.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
Irrigation levels of 70 % (579 mm) and 40 % (371 mm)e0
Outcome
irrigation water productivitye0
Direction
declinese0
Value
32–92 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation levels of 70 % (579 mm) and 40 % (371 mm) caused yield reductions of 51–96 % and irrigation water productivity declines of 32–92 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1057 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Experiment B, irrigation at the -20 kPa threshold yielded 6.8 Mg ha-1.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
−20 kPae0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
6.8 Mg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment of −20 kPa (683 mm) yielded 6.8 Mg ha −1 and 1.0 kg m −3 of irrigation water productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Experiment B, irrigation at the -20 kPa threshold gave an irrigation water productivity of 1.0 kg m-3.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
−20 kPae0
Outcome
irrigation water productivitye0
Value
1.0 kg m −3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment of −20 kPa (683 mm) yielded 6.8 Mg ha −1 and 1.0 kg m −3 of irrigation water productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Experiment B, irrigation at the -40 kPa threshold gave an average grain yield of 5.3 Mg ha-1.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
−40 kPae0
Outcome
average grain yielde0
Value
5.3 Mg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The irrigation threshold of −40 kPa (∼590 mm applied) resulted in an average grain yield of 5.3 Mg ha −1 and irrigation water productivity of 0.89 kg m −3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1335 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Experiment B, irrigation at the -40 kPa threshold gave an irrigation water productivity of 0.89 kg m-3.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
−40 kPae0
Outcome
irrigation water productivitye0
Value
0.89 kg m −3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The irrigation threshold of −40 kPa (∼590 mm applied) resulted in an average grain yield of 5.3 Mg ha −1 and irrigation water productivity of 0.89 kg m −3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield under irrigation at -40 kPa was 22% lower than under -20 kPa.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
irrigation at –40 kPae0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
22 %e0
Comparator
–20 kPae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield under irrigation at –40 kPa was 22 % lower than under –20 kPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2187–2260 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars BRS Esmeralda and BRS A502 showed contrasting gas exchange performance at anthesis among experiments.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Material
BRS Esmeralda and BRS A502e0
Organ / stage
anthesise0
Outcome
gas exchange performancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cultivars BRS Esmeralda and BRS A502 showed contrasting gas exchange performance at anthesis among experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–1990 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Water-saving treatments of 70 and 40% in Experiment A were not suitable for upland rice.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Outcome
water-saving treatments in Experiment Ae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“water-saving treatments in Experiment A (70 and 40 %) were not suitable for upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1481 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The -40 kPa irrigation threshold reduced water use while maintaining irrigation water productivity, making it an effective strategy for water-limited environments.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Outcome
effective strategy for water-limited environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“the −40 kPa irrigation threshold in Experiment B reduced water use while maintaining irrigation water productivity, representing an effective strategy for water-limited environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1677 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 350 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.