Paper · 2018 · Irrigation and Drainage

Water Productivity of Rice Genotypes with Irrigation and Drainage

Rutilo López‐López; José Alfredo Jiménez‐Chong; Leonardo Hernández‐Aragón; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The aims of this study were: (i) to evaluate the agronomic characteristics of thin‐grain rice genotypes with high yield potential under irrigation conditions; (ii) to quantify water productivity (WP) in thin‐grain rice genotypes, based on crop evapotranspiration (ET C ) and irrigation and surface drainage control. Eight genotypes were planted: four varieties, two promising lines and hybrid Clearfield XL745 and IRGA. Direct dry seeding was carried out mechanically at a density of 80 kg ha ‐1 for the varieties and 32 kg ha ‐1 for the hybrid; drainage was performed every 9.3 m inside of the border. The results indicate that there are significant differences ( P > 0.05) among genotypes for grain yield and its components, except for lodging. The varieties and promising rice lines evaluated expressed good productive capacity, but they were surpassed by 19% by the average productivity recorded by the variety IRGA and the hybrid Clearfield. The variation in water demand based on ET C is evident in the optimal irrigation depth applications of 264 mm for the hybrid and 318 mm for the intermediate‐cycle genotypes. The border irrigation method with drainage troughs significantly increases water productivity based on the applied irrigation (WP I ), averaging 2.0 kg m ‐3 . © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice genotypes reportedly differed significantly in grain yield and components, except lodging, despite the stated P > 0.05.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
grain yield and its componentse0
Qualifier
except for lodginge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there are significant differences ( P > 0.05) among genotypes for grain yield and its components, except for lodging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties and promising lines had good productive capacity but averaged 19% below IRGA and Clearfield.

Material
varieties and promising rice linese0
Outcome
productive capacitye0
Direction
surpassede0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
variety IRGA and the hybrid Clearfielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The varieties and promising rice lines evaluated expressed good productive capacity, but they were surpassed by 19% by the average productivity recorded by the variety IRGA and the hybrid Clearfield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–955 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal irrigation depth was 264 mm for the rice hybrid.

Material
hybride0
Outcome
optimal irrigation depth applicationse0
Value
264 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimal irrigation depth applications of 264 mm for the hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal irrigation depth was 318 mm for intermediate-cycle rice genotypes.

Material
intermediate‐cycle genotypese0
Outcome
optimal irrigation depth applicationse1
Value
318 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“318 mm for the intermediate‐cycle genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1128 · show in text ↑
e1

“optimal irrigation depth applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Border irrigation with drainage troughs significantly increased rice water productivity, averaging 2.0 kg m ‐3.

Treatment
border irrigation method with drainage troughse0
Outcome
water productivity based on the applied irrigatione0
Direction
increasese0
Value
2.0 kg m ‐3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The border irrigation method with drainage troughs significantly increases water productivity based on the applied irrigation (WP I ), averaging 2.0 kg m ‐3 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.